TY - JOUR
T1 - Risk assessment of skin lightening cosmetics containing hydroquinone
AU - Matsumoto, Mariko
AU - Todo, Hiroaki
AU - Akiyama, Takumi
AU - Hirata-Koizumi, Mutsuko
AU - Sugibayashi, Kenji
AU - Ikarashi, Yoshiaki
AU - Ono, Atsushi
AU - Hirose, Akihiko
AU - Yokoyama, Kazuhito
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare , Japan (grant no: H24-Tokubetsu-Shitei-028 ).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2016/11/1
Y1 - 2016/11/1
N2 - Following reports on potential risks of hydroquinone (HQ), HQ for skin lightening has been banned or restricted in Europe and the US. In contrast, HQ is not listed as a prohibited or limited ingredient for cosmetic use in Japan, and many HQ cosmetics are sold without restriction. To assess the risk of systemic effects of HQ, we examined the rat skin permeation rates of four HQ (0.3%, 1.0%, 2.6%, and 3.3%) cosmetics. The permeation coefficients ranged from 1.2 × 10−9 to 3.1 × 10−7 cm/s, with the highest value superior than the HQ aqueous solution (1.6 × 10−7 cm/s). After dermal application of the HQ cosmetics to rats, HQ in plasma was detected only in the treatment by highest coefficient cosmetic. Absorbed HQ levels treated with this highest coefficient cosmetic in humans were estimated by numerical methods, and we calculated the margin of exposure (MOE) for the estimated dose (0.017 mg/kg-bw/day in proper use) to a benchmark dose for rat renal tubule adenomas. The MOE of 559 is judged to be in a range safe for the consumer. However, further consideration may be required for regulation of cosmetic ingredients.
AB - Following reports on potential risks of hydroquinone (HQ), HQ for skin lightening has been banned or restricted in Europe and the US. In contrast, HQ is not listed as a prohibited or limited ingredient for cosmetic use in Japan, and many HQ cosmetics are sold without restriction. To assess the risk of systemic effects of HQ, we examined the rat skin permeation rates of four HQ (0.3%, 1.0%, 2.6%, and 3.3%) cosmetics. The permeation coefficients ranged from 1.2 × 10−9 to 3.1 × 10−7 cm/s, with the highest value superior than the HQ aqueous solution (1.6 × 10−7 cm/s). After dermal application of the HQ cosmetics to rats, HQ in plasma was detected only in the treatment by highest coefficient cosmetic. Absorbed HQ levels treated with this highest coefficient cosmetic in humans were estimated by numerical methods, and we calculated the margin of exposure (MOE) for the estimated dose (0.017 mg/kg-bw/day in proper use) to a benchmark dose for rat renal tubule adenomas. The MOE of 559 is judged to be in a range safe for the consumer. However, further consideration may be required for regulation of cosmetic ingredients.
KW - Benchmark dose
KW - Dermal absorption
KW - Hydroquinone
KW - Margin of exposure
KW - Permeation coefficients
KW - Risk assessment
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84982221075&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84982221075&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.yrtph.2016.08.005
DO - 10.1016/j.yrtph.2016.08.005
M3 - Article
C2 - 27521610
AN - SCOPUS:84982221075
SN - 0273-2300
VL - 81
SP - 128
EP - 135
JO - Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology
JF - Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology
ER -