Handling of Germline Findings in Clinical Comprehensive Cancer Genomic Profiling

Mika Okazawa-Sakai, Yasuko Yamamoto, Mashu Futagawa, Miki Okamura, Satoko Miyawaki, Tomohiro Nishina, Kazuhiro Takehara, Toshiyuki Kozuki, Shuta Tomida, Ichinosuke Hyodo, Shozo Ohsumi, Akira Hirasawa

研究成果査読

抄録

Patients found to have presumed germline pathogenic variants (PGPVs) during comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) require genetic counseling (GC) referrals. We retrospectively investigated the outcomes of patients with PGPVs. Among 159 patients who underwent CGP, we recommended GC for the 16 patients with PGPVs (3 with [FG group] and 13 without [G Group] a family/personal history of hereditary cancer) as well as for the 8 patients with no PGPVs, but a history (F group); 2 (67%), 5 (38%), and 3 (38%) patients received GC in the FG, G, and F groups, respectively. Germline testing results were positive in 1 and 2 patients of the FG and G groups, respectively. Among the patients recommended for GC, 58% did not receive GC due to lack of interest, poor performance status, or death. CGP contributes to the identification of germline variants in patients without a history of hereditary cancer. However, the proportion of patients who undergo GC should be improved.

本文言語English
ページ(範囲)673-678
ページ数6
ジャーナルActa medica Okayama
76
6
DOI
出版ステータスPublished - 12月 1 2022

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • 生化学、遺伝学、分子生物学(全般)

フィンガープリント

「Handling of Germline Findings in Clinical Comprehensive Cancer Genomic Profiling」の研究トピックを掘り下げます。これらがまとまってユニークなフィンガープリントを構成します。

引用スタイル