Workplace Determinants of Social Capital: Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Evidence from a Finnish Cohort Study

Tuula Oksanen, Ichiro Kawachi, Anne Kouvonen, Soshi Takao, Etsuji Suzuki, Marianna Virtanen, Jaana Pentti, Mika Kivimäki, Jussi Vahtera

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective:To examine which contextual features of the workplace are associated with social capital.Methods:This is a cohort study of 43,167 employees in 3090 Finnish public sector workplaces who responded to a survey of individual workplace social capital in 2000-02 (response rate 68%). We used ecometrics approach to estimate social capital of work units. Features of the workplace were work unit's demographic and employment patterns and size, obtained from employers' administrative records. We used multilevel-multinomial logistic regression models to examine cross-sectionally whether these features were associated with social capital between individuals and work units. Fixed effects models were used for longitudinal analyses in a subsample of 12,108 individuals to examine the effects of changes in workplace characteristics on changes in social capital between 2000 and 2004.Results:After adjustment for individual characteristics, an increase in work unit size reduced the odds of high levels of individual workplace social capital (odds ratio 0.94, 95% confidence interval 0.91-0.98 per 30-person-year increase). A 20% increase in the proportion of manual and male employees reduced the odds of high levels of social capital by 8% and 23%, respectively. A 30% increase in temporary employees and a 20% increase in employee turnover were associated with 11% (95% confidence interval 1.04-1.17) and 24% (95% confidence interval 1.18-1.30) higher odds of having high levels of social capital respectively). Results from fixed effects models within individuals, adjusted for time-varying covariates, and from social capital of the work units yielded consistent results.Conclusions:These findings suggest that workplace social capital is contextually patterned. Workplace demographic and employment patterns as well as the size of the work unit are important in understanding variations in workplace social capital between individuals and workplaces.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere65846
JournalPLoS One
Volume8
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 11 2013

Fingerprint

social capital
working conditions
cohort studies
Workplace
Cohort Studies
Personnel
human resources
confidence interval
Logistics
Confidence Intervals
Social Capital
Personnel Turnover
demographic statistics
Logistic Models
Demography
public sector
Public Sector
odds ratio
Odds Ratio

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Workplace Determinants of Social Capital : Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Evidence from a Finnish Cohort Study. / Oksanen, Tuula; Kawachi, Ichiro; Kouvonen, Anne; Takao, Soshi; Suzuki, Etsuji; Virtanen, Marianna; Pentti, Jaana; Kivimäki, Mika; Vahtera, Jussi.

In: PLoS One, Vol. 8, No. 6, e65846, 11.06.2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Oksanen, Tuula ; Kawachi, Ichiro ; Kouvonen, Anne ; Takao, Soshi ; Suzuki, Etsuji ; Virtanen, Marianna ; Pentti, Jaana ; Kivimäki, Mika ; Vahtera, Jussi. / Workplace Determinants of Social Capital : Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Evidence from a Finnish Cohort Study. In: PLoS One. 2013 ; Vol. 8, No. 6.
@article{3f611dcc1c3845f9a0bf8d5adccbaee5,
title = "Workplace Determinants of Social Capital: Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Evidence from a Finnish Cohort Study",
abstract = "Objective:To examine which contextual features of the workplace are associated with social capital.Methods:This is a cohort study of 43,167 employees in 3090 Finnish public sector workplaces who responded to a survey of individual workplace social capital in 2000-02 (response rate 68{\%}). We used ecometrics approach to estimate social capital of work units. Features of the workplace were work unit's demographic and employment patterns and size, obtained from employers' administrative records. We used multilevel-multinomial logistic regression models to examine cross-sectionally whether these features were associated with social capital between individuals and work units. Fixed effects models were used for longitudinal analyses in a subsample of 12,108 individuals to examine the effects of changes in workplace characteristics on changes in social capital between 2000 and 2004.Results:After adjustment for individual characteristics, an increase in work unit size reduced the odds of high levels of individual workplace social capital (odds ratio 0.94, 95{\%} confidence interval 0.91-0.98 per 30-person-year increase). A 20{\%} increase in the proportion of manual and male employees reduced the odds of high levels of social capital by 8{\%} and 23{\%}, respectively. A 30{\%} increase in temporary employees and a 20{\%} increase in employee turnover were associated with 11{\%} (95{\%} confidence interval 1.04-1.17) and 24{\%} (95{\%} confidence interval 1.18-1.30) higher odds of having high levels of social capital respectively). Results from fixed effects models within individuals, adjusted for time-varying covariates, and from social capital of the work units yielded consistent results.Conclusions:These findings suggest that workplace social capital is contextually patterned. Workplace demographic and employment patterns as well as the size of the work unit are important in understanding variations in workplace social capital between individuals and workplaces.",
author = "Tuula Oksanen and Ichiro Kawachi and Anne Kouvonen and Soshi Takao and Etsuji Suzuki and Marianna Virtanen and Jaana Pentti and Mika Kivim{\"a}ki and Jussi Vahtera",
year = "2013",
month = "6",
day = "11",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0065846",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
journal = "PLoS One",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Workplace Determinants of Social Capital

T2 - Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Evidence from a Finnish Cohort Study

AU - Oksanen, Tuula

AU - Kawachi, Ichiro

AU - Kouvonen, Anne

AU - Takao, Soshi

AU - Suzuki, Etsuji

AU - Virtanen, Marianna

AU - Pentti, Jaana

AU - Kivimäki, Mika

AU - Vahtera, Jussi

PY - 2013/6/11

Y1 - 2013/6/11

N2 - Objective:To examine which contextual features of the workplace are associated with social capital.Methods:This is a cohort study of 43,167 employees in 3090 Finnish public sector workplaces who responded to a survey of individual workplace social capital in 2000-02 (response rate 68%). We used ecometrics approach to estimate social capital of work units. Features of the workplace were work unit's demographic and employment patterns and size, obtained from employers' administrative records. We used multilevel-multinomial logistic regression models to examine cross-sectionally whether these features were associated with social capital between individuals and work units. Fixed effects models were used for longitudinal analyses in a subsample of 12,108 individuals to examine the effects of changes in workplace characteristics on changes in social capital between 2000 and 2004.Results:After adjustment for individual characteristics, an increase in work unit size reduced the odds of high levels of individual workplace social capital (odds ratio 0.94, 95% confidence interval 0.91-0.98 per 30-person-year increase). A 20% increase in the proportion of manual and male employees reduced the odds of high levels of social capital by 8% and 23%, respectively. A 30% increase in temporary employees and a 20% increase in employee turnover were associated with 11% (95% confidence interval 1.04-1.17) and 24% (95% confidence interval 1.18-1.30) higher odds of having high levels of social capital respectively). Results from fixed effects models within individuals, adjusted for time-varying covariates, and from social capital of the work units yielded consistent results.Conclusions:These findings suggest that workplace social capital is contextually patterned. Workplace demographic and employment patterns as well as the size of the work unit are important in understanding variations in workplace social capital between individuals and workplaces.

AB - Objective:To examine which contextual features of the workplace are associated with social capital.Methods:This is a cohort study of 43,167 employees in 3090 Finnish public sector workplaces who responded to a survey of individual workplace social capital in 2000-02 (response rate 68%). We used ecometrics approach to estimate social capital of work units. Features of the workplace were work unit's demographic and employment patterns and size, obtained from employers' administrative records. We used multilevel-multinomial logistic regression models to examine cross-sectionally whether these features were associated with social capital between individuals and work units. Fixed effects models were used for longitudinal analyses in a subsample of 12,108 individuals to examine the effects of changes in workplace characteristics on changes in social capital between 2000 and 2004.Results:After adjustment for individual characteristics, an increase in work unit size reduced the odds of high levels of individual workplace social capital (odds ratio 0.94, 95% confidence interval 0.91-0.98 per 30-person-year increase). A 20% increase in the proportion of manual and male employees reduced the odds of high levels of social capital by 8% and 23%, respectively. A 30% increase in temporary employees and a 20% increase in employee turnover were associated with 11% (95% confidence interval 1.04-1.17) and 24% (95% confidence interval 1.18-1.30) higher odds of having high levels of social capital respectively). Results from fixed effects models within individuals, adjusted for time-varying covariates, and from social capital of the work units yielded consistent results.Conclusions:These findings suggest that workplace social capital is contextually patterned. Workplace demographic and employment patterns as well as the size of the work unit are important in understanding variations in workplace social capital between individuals and workplaces.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84878941869&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84878941869&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0065846

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0065846

M3 - Article

C2 - 23776555

AN - SCOPUS:84878941869

VL - 8

JO - PLoS One

JF - PLoS One

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 6

M1 - e65846

ER -