Voice mismatch and syntactic identity

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

On the basis of an asymmetry between VP-deletion and pseudogapping, Merchant (2008a) concludes that ellipsis is conditioned by syntax. This article demonstrates that both pseudogapping and VP-deletion potentially allow voice mismatch. The unacceptable cases of voice mismatch in these constructions are attributed to a discourse factor (Kehler 2000, 2002). Nevertheless, since sluicing does not allow voice mismatch (Merchant 2001, 2007) even in the same context that allows voice mismatch in VP-ellipsis, Merchant's (2007, 2008a) conclusion is still valid. A syntactic condition on ellipsis is proposed, based on a semantic condition from Takahashi and Fox 2005. Kehler's discourse explanation is phrased in a revised format.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)470-490
Number of pages21
JournalLinguistic Inquiry
Volume42
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 18 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

mismatch
discourse
syntax
asymmetry
semantics
Syntax
Mismatch
Merchants
Discourse
Ellipse

Keywords

  • Conditions on ellipsis
  • Pseudogapping
  • Sluicing
  • Voice
  • VP-ellipsis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

Voice mismatch and syntactic identity. / Tanaka, Hidekazu.

In: Linguistic Inquiry, Vol. 42, No. 3, 18.07.2011, p. 470-490.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{13b19767c81d41e997f1c25af46ed4f3,
title = "Voice mismatch and syntactic identity",
abstract = "On the basis of an asymmetry between VP-deletion and pseudogapping, Merchant (2008a) concludes that ellipsis is conditioned by syntax. This article demonstrates that both pseudogapping and VP-deletion potentially allow voice mismatch. The unacceptable cases of voice mismatch in these constructions are attributed to a discourse factor (Kehler 2000, 2002). Nevertheless, since sluicing does not allow voice mismatch (Merchant 2001, 2007) even in the same context that allows voice mismatch in VP-ellipsis, Merchant's (2007, 2008a) conclusion is still valid. A syntactic condition on ellipsis is proposed, based on a semantic condition from Takahashi and Fox 2005. Kehler's discourse explanation is phrased in a revised format.",
keywords = "Conditions on ellipsis, Pseudogapping, Sluicing, Voice, VP-ellipsis",
author = "Hidekazu Tanaka",
year = "2011",
month = "7",
day = "18",
doi = "10.1162/LING_a_00054",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "470--490",
journal = "Linguistic Inquiry",
issn = "0024-3892",
publisher = "MIT Press Journals",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Voice mismatch and syntactic identity

AU - Tanaka, Hidekazu

PY - 2011/7/18

Y1 - 2011/7/18

N2 - On the basis of an asymmetry between VP-deletion and pseudogapping, Merchant (2008a) concludes that ellipsis is conditioned by syntax. This article demonstrates that both pseudogapping and VP-deletion potentially allow voice mismatch. The unacceptable cases of voice mismatch in these constructions are attributed to a discourse factor (Kehler 2000, 2002). Nevertheless, since sluicing does not allow voice mismatch (Merchant 2001, 2007) even in the same context that allows voice mismatch in VP-ellipsis, Merchant's (2007, 2008a) conclusion is still valid. A syntactic condition on ellipsis is proposed, based on a semantic condition from Takahashi and Fox 2005. Kehler's discourse explanation is phrased in a revised format.

AB - On the basis of an asymmetry between VP-deletion and pseudogapping, Merchant (2008a) concludes that ellipsis is conditioned by syntax. This article demonstrates that both pseudogapping and VP-deletion potentially allow voice mismatch. The unacceptable cases of voice mismatch in these constructions are attributed to a discourse factor (Kehler 2000, 2002). Nevertheless, since sluicing does not allow voice mismatch (Merchant 2001, 2007) even in the same context that allows voice mismatch in VP-ellipsis, Merchant's (2007, 2008a) conclusion is still valid. A syntactic condition on ellipsis is proposed, based on a semantic condition from Takahashi and Fox 2005. Kehler's discourse explanation is phrased in a revised format.

KW - Conditions on ellipsis

KW - Pseudogapping

KW - Sluicing

KW - Voice

KW - VP-ellipsis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79960271935&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79960271935&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1162/LING_a_00054

DO - 10.1162/LING_a_00054

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:79960271935

VL - 42

SP - 470

EP - 490

JO - Linguistic Inquiry

JF - Linguistic Inquiry

SN - 0024-3892

IS - 3

ER -