Unnoticed Unethical Behavior in Decision Making when Gradually Escalated

Atsuo Murata, Tomoya Morinaga

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

We paid attention to unethical behavior, in particular, the (intentional) violation of rules motivated by the economic incentive or the pursuit of efficiency. When we face a situation under which we must weigh the ethics of safety rule and the efficiency (economic aspect) in the balance, it is difficult for us to recognize the unethical behavior when it was corroded gradually than when it was corroded abruptly. More concretely, it was explored how the probability of dishonesty (cheating) being revealed and the amount of punishment affected the dishonesty (cheating) behavior under the conflict of interest. We found that the participants were less likely to criticize the actions of others, and tended to approve the estimate, and receive the reward (4% or 10% of the estimate)) when their behavior eroded gradually over time than when their behavior changed abruptly. We could identify the combined effect of both large amount of punishment and high probability of being revealed, and found that the combined effect contributed to the decrease of percentage approval (unethical behavior).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3906-3910
Number of pages5
JournalProcedia Manufacturing
Volume3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Decision making
Economics

Keywords

  • Abrupt erosion
  • Decision making
  • Gradual erosion of regulations
  • Percentage approval
  • Safety management
  • Unethical behavior

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

Cite this

Unnoticed Unethical Behavior in Decision Making when Gradually Escalated. / Murata, Atsuo; Morinaga, Tomoya.

In: Procedia Manufacturing, Vol. 3, 2015, p. 3906-3910.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ef082c7a47d1470b872d5bbc8e6e9363,
title = "Unnoticed Unethical Behavior in Decision Making when Gradually Escalated",
abstract = "We paid attention to unethical behavior, in particular, the (intentional) violation of rules motivated by the economic incentive or the pursuit of efficiency. When we face a situation under which we must weigh the ethics of safety rule and the efficiency (economic aspect) in the balance, it is difficult for us to recognize the unethical behavior when it was corroded gradually than when it was corroded abruptly. More concretely, it was explored how the probability of dishonesty (cheating) being revealed and the amount of punishment affected the dishonesty (cheating) behavior under the conflict of interest. We found that the participants were less likely to criticize the actions of others, and tended to approve the estimate, and receive the reward (4{\%} or 10{\%} of the estimate)) when their behavior eroded gradually over time than when their behavior changed abruptly. We could identify the combined effect of both large amount of punishment and high probability of being revealed, and found that the combined effect contributed to the decrease of percentage approval (unethical behavior).",
keywords = "Abrupt erosion, Decision making, Gradual erosion of regulations, Percentage approval, Safety management, Unethical behavior",
author = "Atsuo Murata and Tomoya Morinaga",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.910",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "3906--3910",
journal = "Procedia Manufacturing",
issn = "2351-9789",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Unnoticed Unethical Behavior in Decision Making when Gradually Escalated

AU - Murata, Atsuo

AU - Morinaga, Tomoya

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - We paid attention to unethical behavior, in particular, the (intentional) violation of rules motivated by the economic incentive or the pursuit of efficiency. When we face a situation under which we must weigh the ethics of safety rule and the efficiency (economic aspect) in the balance, it is difficult for us to recognize the unethical behavior when it was corroded gradually than when it was corroded abruptly. More concretely, it was explored how the probability of dishonesty (cheating) being revealed and the amount of punishment affected the dishonesty (cheating) behavior under the conflict of interest. We found that the participants were less likely to criticize the actions of others, and tended to approve the estimate, and receive the reward (4% or 10% of the estimate)) when their behavior eroded gradually over time than when their behavior changed abruptly. We could identify the combined effect of both large amount of punishment and high probability of being revealed, and found that the combined effect contributed to the decrease of percentage approval (unethical behavior).

AB - We paid attention to unethical behavior, in particular, the (intentional) violation of rules motivated by the economic incentive or the pursuit of efficiency. When we face a situation under which we must weigh the ethics of safety rule and the efficiency (economic aspect) in the balance, it is difficult for us to recognize the unethical behavior when it was corroded gradually than when it was corroded abruptly. More concretely, it was explored how the probability of dishonesty (cheating) being revealed and the amount of punishment affected the dishonesty (cheating) behavior under the conflict of interest. We found that the participants were less likely to criticize the actions of others, and tended to approve the estimate, and receive the reward (4% or 10% of the estimate)) when their behavior eroded gradually over time than when their behavior changed abruptly. We could identify the combined effect of both large amount of punishment and high probability of being revealed, and found that the combined effect contributed to the decrease of percentage approval (unethical behavior).

KW - Abrupt erosion

KW - Decision making

KW - Gradual erosion of regulations

KW - Percentage approval

KW - Safety management

KW - Unethical behavior

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85010005899&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85010005899&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.910

DO - 10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.910

M3 - Article

VL - 3

SP - 3906

EP - 3910

JO - Procedia Manufacturing

JF - Procedia Manufacturing

SN - 2351-9789

ER -