Trends and determinant factors in the use of cardiac resynchronization therapy devices in Japan: Analysis of the Japan cardiac device treatment registry database

Hisashi Yokoshiki, Akihiko Shimizu, Takeshi Mitsuhashi, Hiroshi Furushima, Yukio Sekiguchi, Tetsuyuki Manaka, Nobuhiro Nishii, Takeshi Ueyama, Norishige Morita, Takashi Nitta, Ken Okumura

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The choice of cardiac resynchronization therapy device, with (CRT-D) or without (CRT-P) a defibrillator, in patients with heart failure largely depends on the physician's discretion, because it has not been established which subjects benefit most from a defibrillator. Methods: We examined the annual trend of CRT device implantations between 2006 and 2014, and evaluated the factors related to the device selection (CRT-D or CRT-P) for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death in patients with heart failure by analyzing the Japan Cardiac Device Treatment Registry (JCDTR) database from January 2011 and August 2015 (CRT-D, . n=2714; CRT-P, . n=555). Results: The proportion of CRT-D implantations for primary prevention among all the CRT-D recipients was more than 70% during the study period. The number of CRT-D implantations for primary prevention reached a maximum in 2011 and decreased gradually between 2011 and 2014, whereas CRT-P implantations increased year by year until 2011 and remained unchanged in recent years. Multivariate analysis identified age (odds ratio [OR] 0.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.90-0.95, . P

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Arrhythmia
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - Mar 2 2016

Fingerprint

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices
Registries
Japan
Databases
Equipment and Supplies
Primary Prevention
Defibrillators
Therapeutics
Heart Failure
Sudden Cardiac Death
Multivariate Analysis
Odds Ratio
Confidence Intervals
Physicians

Keywords

  • Cardiac resynchronization therapy
  • Defibrillator
  • Heart failure
  • Primary prevention

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Trends and determinant factors in the use of cardiac resynchronization therapy devices in Japan : Analysis of the Japan cardiac device treatment registry database. / Yokoshiki, Hisashi; Shimizu, Akihiko; Mitsuhashi, Takeshi; Furushima, Hiroshi; Sekiguchi, Yukio; Manaka, Tetsuyuki; Nishii, Nobuhiro; Ueyama, Takeshi; Morita, Norishige; Nitta, Takashi; Okumura, Ken.

In: Journal of Arrhythmia, 02.03.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Yokoshiki, Hisashi ; Shimizu, Akihiko ; Mitsuhashi, Takeshi ; Furushima, Hiroshi ; Sekiguchi, Yukio ; Manaka, Tetsuyuki ; Nishii, Nobuhiro ; Ueyama, Takeshi ; Morita, Norishige ; Nitta, Takashi ; Okumura, Ken. / Trends and determinant factors in the use of cardiac resynchronization therapy devices in Japan : Analysis of the Japan cardiac device treatment registry database. In: Journal of Arrhythmia. 2016.
@article{624c8e761e3540b5a567ceaad91b9df4,
title = "Trends and determinant factors in the use of cardiac resynchronization therapy devices in Japan: Analysis of the Japan cardiac device treatment registry database",
abstract = "Background: The choice of cardiac resynchronization therapy device, with (CRT-D) or without (CRT-P) a defibrillator, in patients with heart failure largely depends on the physician's discretion, because it has not been established which subjects benefit most from a defibrillator. Methods: We examined the annual trend of CRT device implantations between 2006 and 2014, and evaluated the factors related to the device selection (CRT-D or CRT-P) for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death in patients with heart failure by analyzing the Japan Cardiac Device Treatment Registry (JCDTR) database from January 2011 and August 2015 (CRT-D, . n=2714; CRT-P, . n=555). Results: The proportion of CRT-D implantations for primary prevention among all the CRT-D recipients was more than 70{\%} during the study period. The number of CRT-D implantations for primary prevention reached a maximum in 2011 and decreased gradually between 2011 and 2014, whereas CRT-P implantations increased year by year until 2011 and remained unchanged in recent years. Multivariate analysis identified age (odds ratio [OR] 0.92, 95{\%} confidence interval [CI] 0.90-0.95, . P",
keywords = "Cardiac resynchronization therapy, Defibrillator, Heart failure, Primary prevention",
author = "Hisashi Yokoshiki and Akihiko Shimizu and Takeshi Mitsuhashi and Hiroshi Furushima and Yukio Sekiguchi and Tetsuyuki Manaka and Nobuhiro Nishii and Takeshi Ueyama and Norishige Morita and Takashi Nitta and Ken Okumura",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.joa.2016.04.002",
language = "English",
journal = "Journal of Arrhythmia",
issn = "1880-4276",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Trends and determinant factors in the use of cardiac resynchronization therapy devices in Japan

T2 - Analysis of the Japan cardiac device treatment registry database

AU - Yokoshiki, Hisashi

AU - Shimizu, Akihiko

AU - Mitsuhashi, Takeshi

AU - Furushima, Hiroshi

AU - Sekiguchi, Yukio

AU - Manaka, Tetsuyuki

AU - Nishii, Nobuhiro

AU - Ueyama, Takeshi

AU - Morita, Norishige

AU - Nitta, Takashi

AU - Okumura, Ken

PY - 2016/3/2

Y1 - 2016/3/2

N2 - Background: The choice of cardiac resynchronization therapy device, with (CRT-D) or without (CRT-P) a defibrillator, in patients with heart failure largely depends on the physician's discretion, because it has not been established which subjects benefit most from a defibrillator. Methods: We examined the annual trend of CRT device implantations between 2006 and 2014, and evaluated the factors related to the device selection (CRT-D or CRT-P) for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death in patients with heart failure by analyzing the Japan Cardiac Device Treatment Registry (JCDTR) database from January 2011 and August 2015 (CRT-D, . n=2714; CRT-P, . n=555). Results: The proportion of CRT-D implantations for primary prevention among all the CRT-D recipients was more than 70% during the study period. The number of CRT-D implantations for primary prevention reached a maximum in 2011 and decreased gradually between 2011 and 2014, whereas CRT-P implantations increased year by year until 2011 and remained unchanged in recent years. Multivariate analysis identified age (odds ratio [OR] 0.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.90-0.95, . P

AB - Background: The choice of cardiac resynchronization therapy device, with (CRT-D) or without (CRT-P) a defibrillator, in patients with heart failure largely depends on the physician's discretion, because it has not been established which subjects benefit most from a defibrillator. Methods: We examined the annual trend of CRT device implantations between 2006 and 2014, and evaluated the factors related to the device selection (CRT-D or CRT-P) for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death in patients with heart failure by analyzing the Japan Cardiac Device Treatment Registry (JCDTR) database from January 2011 and August 2015 (CRT-D, . n=2714; CRT-P, . n=555). Results: The proportion of CRT-D implantations for primary prevention among all the CRT-D recipients was more than 70% during the study period. The number of CRT-D implantations for primary prevention reached a maximum in 2011 and decreased gradually between 2011 and 2014, whereas CRT-P implantations increased year by year until 2011 and remained unchanged in recent years. Multivariate analysis identified age (odds ratio [OR] 0.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.90-0.95, . P

KW - Cardiac resynchronization therapy

KW - Defibrillator

KW - Heart failure

KW - Primary prevention

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84964661136&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84964661136&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.joa.2016.04.002

DO - 10.1016/j.joa.2016.04.002

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84964661136

JO - Journal of Arrhythmia

JF - Journal of Arrhythmia

SN - 1880-4276

ER -