Time changes, so do people

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

When one discusses the dynamic changes in human health over time, one innately conceptualizes time from the three different, but related perspectives - age, period, and cohort. To determine their separate contributions to health outcomes, age-period-cohort analyses have been used for the past 80 years. This commentary aims to provide some insight into this analytical method by distinguishing the concept of time in terms of composition and context. To demonstrate, the author uses hypothetical nested data structures of age-period-cohort analyses in the two types of individual-level data, i.e., repeated cross-sectional survey and longitudinal data on the same individuals. The conceptual distinctions between composition and context have profound implications of hypothetical interventions in age-period-cohort analyses. Age is a compositional variable, and a hypothetical intervention to change age is at the individual level. By contrast, both period and cohort are contexts, and thus two distinct types of hypothetical interventions can be envisaged to examine their contextual effects. On a related issue, the author also discusses manipulability of time. Although time is a significant context in biomedical science, it is not the only context. In this commentary, context is proposed to be classified into three fundamental dimensions - relational, spatial, and temporal. Inattention to the contextual triad leads to a biased and precarious knowledge base for public health action, and the continuing flow of performance over time is an intrinsic component of improving our understanding of multilevel causal inference in the new era of eco-epidemiology.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)452-456
Number of pages5
JournalSocial Science and Medicine
Volume75
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2012

Fingerprint

Cohort Studies
Demography
epidemiology
Knowledge Bases
health
Health
time
public health
Cohort
Epidemiology
Public Health
Cross-Sectional Studies
science
performance
Causal Inference
Contextual Effects
Intrinsic
Survey Data
Triad
Concept of Time

Keywords

  • Age-period-cohort analysis
  • Causality
  • Change
  • Composition
  • Context
  • Counterfactual
  • Multilevel analysis
  • Time

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • History and Philosophy of Science

Cite this

Time changes, so do people. / Suzuki, Etsuji.

In: Social Science and Medicine, Vol. 75, No. 3, 08.2012, p. 452-456.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Suzuki, Etsuji. / Time changes, so do people. In: Social Science and Medicine. 2012 ; Vol. 75, No. 3. pp. 452-456.
@article{09f696cafe74430c8456bef72a55c4d4,
title = "Time changes, so do people",
abstract = "When one discusses the dynamic changes in human health over time, one innately conceptualizes time from the three different, but related perspectives - age, period, and cohort. To determine their separate contributions to health outcomes, age-period-cohort analyses have been used for the past 80 years. This commentary aims to provide some insight into this analytical method by distinguishing the concept of time in terms of composition and context. To demonstrate, the author uses hypothetical nested data structures of age-period-cohort analyses in the two types of individual-level data, i.e., repeated cross-sectional survey and longitudinal data on the same individuals. The conceptual distinctions between composition and context have profound implications of hypothetical interventions in age-period-cohort analyses. Age is a compositional variable, and a hypothetical intervention to change age is at the individual level. By contrast, both period and cohort are contexts, and thus two distinct types of hypothetical interventions can be envisaged to examine their contextual effects. On a related issue, the author also discusses manipulability of time. Although time is a significant context in biomedical science, it is not the only context. In this commentary, context is proposed to be classified into three fundamental dimensions - relational, spatial, and temporal. Inattention to the contextual triad leads to a biased and precarious knowledge base for public health action, and the continuing flow of performance over time is an intrinsic component of improving our understanding of multilevel causal inference in the new era of eco-epidemiology.",
keywords = "Age-period-cohort analysis, Causality, Change, Composition, Context, Counterfactual, Multilevel analysis, Time",
author = "Etsuji Suzuki",
year = "2012",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.03.036",
language = "English",
volume = "75",
pages = "452--456",
journal = "Social Science and Medicine",
issn = "0277-9536",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Time changes, so do people

AU - Suzuki, Etsuji

PY - 2012/8

Y1 - 2012/8

N2 - When one discusses the dynamic changes in human health over time, one innately conceptualizes time from the three different, but related perspectives - age, period, and cohort. To determine their separate contributions to health outcomes, age-period-cohort analyses have been used for the past 80 years. This commentary aims to provide some insight into this analytical method by distinguishing the concept of time in terms of composition and context. To demonstrate, the author uses hypothetical nested data structures of age-period-cohort analyses in the two types of individual-level data, i.e., repeated cross-sectional survey and longitudinal data on the same individuals. The conceptual distinctions between composition and context have profound implications of hypothetical interventions in age-period-cohort analyses. Age is a compositional variable, and a hypothetical intervention to change age is at the individual level. By contrast, both period and cohort are contexts, and thus two distinct types of hypothetical interventions can be envisaged to examine their contextual effects. On a related issue, the author also discusses manipulability of time. Although time is a significant context in biomedical science, it is not the only context. In this commentary, context is proposed to be classified into three fundamental dimensions - relational, spatial, and temporal. Inattention to the contextual triad leads to a biased and precarious knowledge base for public health action, and the continuing flow of performance over time is an intrinsic component of improving our understanding of multilevel causal inference in the new era of eco-epidemiology.

AB - When one discusses the dynamic changes in human health over time, one innately conceptualizes time from the three different, but related perspectives - age, period, and cohort. To determine their separate contributions to health outcomes, age-period-cohort analyses have been used for the past 80 years. This commentary aims to provide some insight into this analytical method by distinguishing the concept of time in terms of composition and context. To demonstrate, the author uses hypothetical nested data structures of age-period-cohort analyses in the two types of individual-level data, i.e., repeated cross-sectional survey and longitudinal data on the same individuals. The conceptual distinctions between composition and context have profound implications of hypothetical interventions in age-period-cohort analyses. Age is a compositional variable, and a hypothetical intervention to change age is at the individual level. By contrast, both period and cohort are contexts, and thus two distinct types of hypothetical interventions can be envisaged to examine their contextual effects. On a related issue, the author also discusses manipulability of time. Although time is a significant context in biomedical science, it is not the only context. In this commentary, context is proposed to be classified into three fundamental dimensions - relational, spatial, and temporal. Inattention to the contextual triad leads to a biased and precarious knowledge base for public health action, and the continuing flow of performance over time is an intrinsic component of improving our understanding of multilevel causal inference in the new era of eco-epidemiology.

KW - Age-period-cohort analysis

KW - Causality

KW - Change

KW - Composition

KW - Context

KW - Counterfactual

KW - Multilevel analysis

KW - Time

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84861716719&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84861716719&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.03.036

DO - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.03.036

M3 - Article

C2 - 22591827

AN - SCOPUS:84861716719

VL - 75

SP - 452

EP - 456

JO - Social Science and Medicine

JF - Social Science and Medicine

SN - 0277-9536

IS - 3

ER -