The viscoelastic behavior of dental adhesives

A nanoindentation study

Alireza Sadr, Yasushi Shimada, Hongbing Lu, Junji Tagami

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: In order to predict the long-term performance of dental adhesives, it is necessary to understand their mechanical properties. The objective of this study was to use a new nanoindentation technique to characterize the in-plane linear viscoelastic properties of dental adhesive layers. Methods: The dental adhesives used were Clearfil SE Bond (CSE) and Clearfil Tri-S Bond (CTS) by Kuraray Medical and Single Bond (SIB) and Single Bond Plus (SBP) by 3M ESPE. A thin film of each adhesive was made on a micro-glass slide, and was then tested on a nanoindenter system (ENT 1100, Elionix) with a Berkovich indenter at a constant loading rate of 0.1 mN/s up to a maximum load of 1.8 mN. The load-displacement data of the loading segment were fitted to a curve to find best fit parameters for a generalized Kelvin viscoelastic model, from which creep compliance and Young's modulus were calculated. The modulus results were compared to the values calculated by the nanoindentation device. Results: The experimental data fitted well to the viscoelastic model for all materials (R > 0.9999). SIB and CTS showed higher creep compliance compared to SBP and CSE. The modulus values obtained using the model were 4.0, 2.6, 2.4 and 4.2 GPa for CSE, CTS, SIB and SBP, respectively. The nanoindentation default software designed for time-independent materials significantly overestimated the modulus values up to 2.5 times. Conclusion: As generally expected for polymer materials, the adhesives tested showed time-dependent viscoelastic behavior. The mechanical evaluation techniques developed for time-independent materials ignore this behavior and may not be appropriate for dental adhesives.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)13-19
Number of pages7
JournalDental Materials
Volume25
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dental Cements
Nanoindentation
Adhesives
Compliance
Creep
Elastic Modulus
Glass
Polymers
Software
Elastic moduli
Thin films
Equipment and Supplies
Mechanical properties
Single Bond Plus
Clearfil Tri-S Bond
single bond
Clearfil SE Bond

Keywords

  • Bonding
  • Creep compliance
  • Dental adhesives
  • Etch and rinse
  • Filled resin
  • Nanoindentation
  • Resin polymer
  • Self-etch
  • Viscoelasticity
  • Young's modulus

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Materials Science(all)
  • Dentistry(all)
  • Mechanics of Materials

Cite this

The viscoelastic behavior of dental adhesives : A nanoindentation study. / Sadr, Alireza; Shimada, Yasushi; Lu, Hongbing; Tagami, Junji.

In: Dental Materials, Vol. 25, No. 1, 01.2009, p. 13-19.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sadr, Alireza ; Shimada, Yasushi ; Lu, Hongbing ; Tagami, Junji. / The viscoelastic behavior of dental adhesives : A nanoindentation study. In: Dental Materials. 2009 ; Vol. 25, No. 1. pp. 13-19.
@article{2d48002591e644cb8c9557f4e587c9a9,
title = "The viscoelastic behavior of dental adhesives: A nanoindentation study",
abstract = "Objectives: In order to predict the long-term performance of dental adhesives, it is necessary to understand their mechanical properties. The objective of this study was to use a new nanoindentation technique to characterize the in-plane linear viscoelastic properties of dental adhesive layers. Methods: The dental adhesives used were Clearfil SE Bond (CSE) and Clearfil Tri-S Bond (CTS) by Kuraray Medical and Single Bond (SIB) and Single Bond Plus (SBP) by 3M ESPE. A thin film of each adhesive was made on a micro-glass slide, and was then tested on a nanoindenter system (ENT 1100, Elionix) with a Berkovich indenter at a constant loading rate of 0.1 mN/s up to a maximum load of 1.8 mN. The load-displacement data of the loading segment were fitted to a curve to find best fit parameters for a generalized Kelvin viscoelastic model, from which creep compliance and Young's modulus were calculated. The modulus results were compared to the values calculated by the nanoindentation device. Results: The experimental data fitted well to the viscoelastic model for all materials (R > 0.9999). SIB and CTS showed higher creep compliance compared to SBP and CSE. The modulus values obtained using the model were 4.0, 2.6, 2.4 and 4.2 GPa for CSE, CTS, SIB and SBP, respectively. The nanoindentation default software designed for time-independent materials significantly overestimated the modulus values up to 2.5 times. Conclusion: As generally expected for polymer materials, the adhesives tested showed time-dependent viscoelastic behavior. The mechanical evaluation techniques developed for time-independent materials ignore this behavior and may not be appropriate for dental adhesives.",
keywords = "Bonding, Creep compliance, Dental adhesives, Etch and rinse, Filled resin, Nanoindentation, Resin polymer, Self-etch, Viscoelasticity, Young's modulus",
author = "Alireza Sadr and Yasushi Shimada and Hongbing Lu and Junji Tagami",
year = "2009",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.dental.2008.05.001",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "13--19",
journal = "Dental Materials",
issn = "0109-5641",
publisher = "Elsevier Science",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The viscoelastic behavior of dental adhesives

T2 - A nanoindentation study

AU - Sadr, Alireza

AU - Shimada, Yasushi

AU - Lu, Hongbing

AU - Tagami, Junji

PY - 2009/1

Y1 - 2009/1

N2 - Objectives: In order to predict the long-term performance of dental adhesives, it is necessary to understand their mechanical properties. The objective of this study was to use a new nanoindentation technique to characterize the in-plane linear viscoelastic properties of dental adhesive layers. Methods: The dental adhesives used were Clearfil SE Bond (CSE) and Clearfil Tri-S Bond (CTS) by Kuraray Medical and Single Bond (SIB) and Single Bond Plus (SBP) by 3M ESPE. A thin film of each adhesive was made on a micro-glass slide, and was then tested on a nanoindenter system (ENT 1100, Elionix) with a Berkovich indenter at a constant loading rate of 0.1 mN/s up to a maximum load of 1.8 mN. The load-displacement data of the loading segment were fitted to a curve to find best fit parameters for a generalized Kelvin viscoelastic model, from which creep compliance and Young's modulus were calculated. The modulus results were compared to the values calculated by the nanoindentation device. Results: The experimental data fitted well to the viscoelastic model for all materials (R > 0.9999). SIB and CTS showed higher creep compliance compared to SBP and CSE. The modulus values obtained using the model were 4.0, 2.6, 2.4 and 4.2 GPa for CSE, CTS, SIB and SBP, respectively. The nanoindentation default software designed for time-independent materials significantly overestimated the modulus values up to 2.5 times. Conclusion: As generally expected for polymer materials, the adhesives tested showed time-dependent viscoelastic behavior. The mechanical evaluation techniques developed for time-independent materials ignore this behavior and may not be appropriate for dental adhesives.

AB - Objectives: In order to predict the long-term performance of dental adhesives, it is necessary to understand their mechanical properties. The objective of this study was to use a new nanoindentation technique to characterize the in-plane linear viscoelastic properties of dental adhesive layers. Methods: The dental adhesives used were Clearfil SE Bond (CSE) and Clearfil Tri-S Bond (CTS) by Kuraray Medical and Single Bond (SIB) and Single Bond Plus (SBP) by 3M ESPE. A thin film of each adhesive was made on a micro-glass slide, and was then tested on a nanoindenter system (ENT 1100, Elionix) with a Berkovich indenter at a constant loading rate of 0.1 mN/s up to a maximum load of 1.8 mN. The load-displacement data of the loading segment were fitted to a curve to find best fit parameters for a generalized Kelvin viscoelastic model, from which creep compliance and Young's modulus were calculated. The modulus results were compared to the values calculated by the nanoindentation device. Results: The experimental data fitted well to the viscoelastic model for all materials (R > 0.9999). SIB and CTS showed higher creep compliance compared to SBP and CSE. The modulus values obtained using the model were 4.0, 2.6, 2.4 and 4.2 GPa for CSE, CTS, SIB and SBP, respectively. The nanoindentation default software designed for time-independent materials significantly overestimated the modulus values up to 2.5 times. Conclusion: As generally expected for polymer materials, the adhesives tested showed time-dependent viscoelastic behavior. The mechanical evaluation techniques developed for time-independent materials ignore this behavior and may not be appropriate for dental adhesives.

KW - Bonding

KW - Creep compliance

KW - Dental adhesives

KW - Etch and rinse

KW - Filled resin

KW - Nanoindentation

KW - Resin polymer

KW - Self-etch

KW - Viscoelasticity

KW - Young's modulus

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=57349141006&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=57349141006&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.dental.2008.05.001

DO - 10.1016/j.dental.2008.05.001

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 13

EP - 19

JO - Dental Materials

JF - Dental Materials

SN - 0109-5641

IS - 1

ER -