The different effects of intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO) and sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) on mandibular border movement

Hiroki Komori, Noriaki Kawanabe, Tomoki Kataoka, Yui Kato, Atsuro Fujisawa, Takashi Yamashiro, Hiroshi Kamioka

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives: This study investigated the different effects of intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO) and sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) on mandibular border movement. Methods: The participants included 22 patients receiving IVRO and 22 patients receiving SSRO who were treated at Okayama University Hospital. Their mandibular border movement was evaluated in three dimensions with 6° of freedom using an optical recording system. Results: A strong correlation between condylar and lower incisor movement was observed during maximum jaw protrusion and laterotrusion. Significant improvements in condylar and lower incisor movement were detected after orthognathic surgery during maximum jaw protrusion and laterotrusion in the IVRO group and during maximum jaw protrusion in the SSRO group. Discussion: IVRO likely achieves greater improvement in jaw movement than SSRO. Therefore, the application of IVRO could be considered in the treatment of patients with jaw deformities featuring temporomandibular joint problems.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-6
Number of pages6
JournalCranio - Journal of Craniomandibular Practice
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - Apr 25 2017

Fingerprint

Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy
Osteotomy
Jaw
Incisor
Orthognathic Surgery
Optical Devices
Temporomandibular Joint

Keywords

  • Intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO)
  • mandibular border movement
  • maximum jaw laterotrusion
  • maximum jaw protrusion
  • sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

The different effects of intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO) and sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) on mandibular border movement. / Komori, Hiroki; Kawanabe, Noriaki; Kataoka, Tomoki; Kato, Yui; Fujisawa, Atsuro; Yamashiro, Takashi; Kamioka, Hiroshi.

In: Cranio - Journal of Craniomandibular Practice, 25.04.2017, p. 1-6.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{85df4be75bba4cbe81e528162a48f3d7,
title = "The different effects of intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO) and sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) on mandibular border movement",
abstract = "Objectives: This study investigated the different effects of intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO) and sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) on mandibular border movement. Methods: The participants included 22 patients receiving IVRO and 22 patients receiving SSRO who were treated at Okayama University Hospital. Their mandibular border movement was evaluated in three dimensions with 6° of freedom using an optical recording system. Results: A strong correlation between condylar and lower incisor movement was observed during maximum jaw protrusion and laterotrusion. Significant improvements in condylar and lower incisor movement were detected after orthognathic surgery during maximum jaw protrusion and laterotrusion in the IVRO group and during maximum jaw protrusion in the SSRO group. Discussion: IVRO likely achieves greater improvement in jaw movement than SSRO. Therefore, the application of IVRO could be considered in the treatment of patients with jaw deformities featuring temporomandibular joint problems.",
keywords = "Intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO), mandibular border movement, maximum jaw laterotrusion, maximum jaw protrusion, sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO)",
author = "Hiroki Komori and Noriaki Kawanabe and Tomoki Kataoka and Yui Kato and Atsuro Fujisawa and Takashi Yamashiro and Hiroshi Kamioka",
year = "2017",
month = "4",
day = "25",
doi = "10.1080/08869634.2017.1317899",
language = "English",
pages = "1--6",
journal = "Cranio - Journal of Craniomandibular Practice",
issn = "0886-9634",
publisher = "Chroma, Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The different effects of intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO) and sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) on mandibular border movement

AU - Komori, Hiroki

AU - Kawanabe, Noriaki

AU - Kataoka, Tomoki

AU - Kato, Yui

AU - Fujisawa, Atsuro

AU - Yamashiro, Takashi

AU - Kamioka, Hiroshi

PY - 2017/4/25

Y1 - 2017/4/25

N2 - Objectives: This study investigated the different effects of intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO) and sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) on mandibular border movement. Methods: The participants included 22 patients receiving IVRO and 22 patients receiving SSRO who were treated at Okayama University Hospital. Their mandibular border movement was evaluated in three dimensions with 6° of freedom using an optical recording system. Results: A strong correlation between condylar and lower incisor movement was observed during maximum jaw protrusion and laterotrusion. Significant improvements in condylar and lower incisor movement were detected after orthognathic surgery during maximum jaw protrusion and laterotrusion in the IVRO group and during maximum jaw protrusion in the SSRO group. Discussion: IVRO likely achieves greater improvement in jaw movement than SSRO. Therefore, the application of IVRO could be considered in the treatment of patients with jaw deformities featuring temporomandibular joint problems.

AB - Objectives: This study investigated the different effects of intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO) and sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) on mandibular border movement. Methods: The participants included 22 patients receiving IVRO and 22 patients receiving SSRO who were treated at Okayama University Hospital. Their mandibular border movement was evaluated in three dimensions with 6° of freedom using an optical recording system. Results: A strong correlation between condylar and lower incisor movement was observed during maximum jaw protrusion and laterotrusion. Significant improvements in condylar and lower incisor movement were detected after orthognathic surgery during maximum jaw protrusion and laterotrusion in the IVRO group and during maximum jaw protrusion in the SSRO group. Discussion: IVRO likely achieves greater improvement in jaw movement than SSRO. Therefore, the application of IVRO could be considered in the treatment of patients with jaw deformities featuring temporomandibular joint problems.

KW - Intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO)

KW - mandibular border movement

KW - maximum jaw laterotrusion

KW - maximum jaw protrusion

KW - sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO)

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018839379&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85018839379&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/08869634.2017.1317899

DO - 10.1080/08869634.2017.1317899

M3 - Article

C2 - 28436308

AN - SCOPUS:85018839379

SP - 1

EP - 6

JO - Cranio - Journal of Craniomandibular Practice

JF - Cranio - Journal of Craniomandibular Practice

SN - 0886-9634

ER -