The Child Dental Control Assessment (CDCA) in youth

reliability, validity and cross-cultural differences.

T. Coolidge, M. Heima, L. J. Heaton, Y. Nakai, O. Höskuldsson, T. A. Smith, P. Weinstein, P. Milgrom

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

AIM: The Child Dental Control Assessment (CDCA) measures children's preferred control strategies in the dental situation. Three studies are reported, assessing aspects of this instrument in youths from the USA, Japan and Australia. In particular, measurements were made as to the reliability and validity of this instrument in this age group in the three cultures, as well as comparing some results across cultures. STUDY DESIGN: These studies used a questionnaire design. METHODS: Questionnaires (including the CDCA and other measures) were given to youths aged 11-15 in the three cultures. In one culture, youths received the questionnaire twice, to compute test-retest reliability. RESULTS: The measure's reliability and validity were similar to those of other measures. The CDCA behaves similarly to the Revised Iowa Dental Control Index (R-IDCI). Youths in all three cultures showed similar responses, although the Japanese were less likely to endorse items. STATISTICS: Internal reliability of the scale ranged from 0.74 to 0.85. Test- retest reliability was 0.74. Participants in the High Desire/Low Predicted classification on the R-IDCI scored higher on the CDCA (t (73) = 2.9, p <.01). In the Japanese and Australian samples the correlation between CDCA and dental fear was 0.29-0.33 (p <.001). The Australian and USA samples scored significantly higher than the Japanese sample (overall F(2,1544) = 383.98, p <.001, followed by Tukey's HSD, p <.001). CONCLUSIONS: These results provide evidence for the reliability and validity of the CDCA in youth. It appears to measure the discrepancy between Desired and Predicted Control identified in the Revised Iowa Dental Control Index (R-IDCI). Responses of the youth in all three cultures were similar, indicating common dental control preferences for individuals of this age. However, consistent with cultural values, Japanese youth were less likely to endorse the control strategies. These results underline the need to develop culturally-specific, as well as situationally-specific control measures.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)35-43
Number of pages9
JournalEuropean journal of paediatric dentistry
Volume6
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Reproducibility of Results
Tooth
Dental Anxiety
Japan
Age Groups

Cite this

Coolidge, T., Heima, M., Heaton, L. J., Nakai, Y., Höskuldsson, O., Smith, T. A., ... Milgrom, P. (2005). The Child Dental Control Assessment (CDCA) in youth: reliability, validity and cross-cultural differences. European journal of paediatric dentistry, 6(1), 35-43.

The Child Dental Control Assessment (CDCA) in youth : reliability, validity and cross-cultural differences. / Coolidge, T.; Heima, M.; Heaton, L. J.; Nakai, Y.; Höskuldsson, O.; Smith, T. A.; Weinstein, P.; Milgrom, P.

In: European journal of paediatric dentistry, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2005, p. 35-43.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Coolidge, T, Heima, M, Heaton, LJ, Nakai, Y, Höskuldsson, O, Smith, TA, Weinstein, P & Milgrom, P 2005, 'The Child Dental Control Assessment (CDCA) in youth: reliability, validity and cross-cultural differences.', European journal of paediatric dentistry, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 35-43.
Coolidge, T. ; Heima, M. ; Heaton, L. J. ; Nakai, Y. ; Höskuldsson, O. ; Smith, T. A. ; Weinstein, P. ; Milgrom, P. / The Child Dental Control Assessment (CDCA) in youth : reliability, validity and cross-cultural differences. In: European journal of paediatric dentistry. 2005 ; Vol. 6, No. 1. pp. 35-43.
@article{b7b42d7469554f689f3889ac06ba38da,
title = "The Child Dental Control Assessment (CDCA) in youth: reliability, validity and cross-cultural differences.",
abstract = "AIM: The Child Dental Control Assessment (CDCA) measures children's preferred control strategies in the dental situation. Three studies are reported, assessing aspects of this instrument in youths from the USA, Japan and Australia. In particular, measurements were made as to the reliability and validity of this instrument in this age group in the three cultures, as well as comparing some results across cultures. STUDY DESIGN: These studies used a questionnaire design. METHODS: Questionnaires (including the CDCA and other measures) were given to youths aged 11-15 in the three cultures. In one culture, youths received the questionnaire twice, to compute test-retest reliability. RESULTS: The measure's reliability and validity were similar to those of other measures. The CDCA behaves similarly to the Revised Iowa Dental Control Index (R-IDCI). Youths in all three cultures showed similar responses, although the Japanese were less likely to endorse items. STATISTICS: Internal reliability of the scale ranged from 0.74 to 0.85. Test- retest reliability was 0.74. Participants in the High Desire/Low Predicted classification on the R-IDCI scored higher on the CDCA (t (73) = 2.9, p <.01). In the Japanese and Australian samples the correlation between CDCA and dental fear was 0.29-0.33 (p <.001). The Australian and USA samples scored significantly higher than the Japanese sample (overall F(2,1544) = 383.98, p <.001, followed by Tukey's HSD, p <.001). CONCLUSIONS: These results provide evidence for the reliability and validity of the CDCA in youth. It appears to measure the discrepancy between Desired and Predicted Control identified in the Revised Iowa Dental Control Index (R-IDCI). Responses of the youth in all three cultures were similar, indicating common dental control preferences for individuals of this age. However, consistent with cultural values, Japanese youth were less likely to endorse the control strategies. These results underline the need to develop culturally-specific, as well as situationally-specific control measures.",
author = "T. Coolidge and M. Heima and Heaton, {L. J.} and Y. Nakai and O. H{\"o}skuldsson and Smith, {T. A.} and P. Weinstein and P. Milgrom",
year = "2005",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "35--43",
journal = "European journal of paediatric dentistry : official journal of European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry",
issn = "1591-996X",
publisher = "Italian Society of Paediatric Dentistry",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Child Dental Control Assessment (CDCA) in youth

T2 - reliability, validity and cross-cultural differences.

AU - Coolidge, T.

AU - Heima, M.

AU - Heaton, L. J.

AU - Nakai, Y.

AU - Höskuldsson, O.

AU - Smith, T. A.

AU - Weinstein, P.

AU - Milgrom, P.

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - AIM: The Child Dental Control Assessment (CDCA) measures children's preferred control strategies in the dental situation. Three studies are reported, assessing aspects of this instrument in youths from the USA, Japan and Australia. In particular, measurements were made as to the reliability and validity of this instrument in this age group in the three cultures, as well as comparing some results across cultures. STUDY DESIGN: These studies used a questionnaire design. METHODS: Questionnaires (including the CDCA and other measures) were given to youths aged 11-15 in the three cultures. In one culture, youths received the questionnaire twice, to compute test-retest reliability. RESULTS: The measure's reliability and validity were similar to those of other measures. The CDCA behaves similarly to the Revised Iowa Dental Control Index (R-IDCI). Youths in all three cultures showed similar responses, although the Japanese were less likely to endorse items. STATISTICS: Internal reliability of the scale ranged from 0.74 to 0.85. Test- retest reliability was 0.74. Participants in the High Desire/Low Predicted classification on the R-IDCI scored higher on the CDCA (t (73) = 2.9, p <.01). In the Japanese and Australian samples the correlation between CDCA and dental fear was 0.29-0.33 (p <.001). The Australian and USA samples scored significantly higher than the Japanese sample (overall F(2,1544) = 383.98, p <.001, followed by Tukey's HSD, p <.001). CONCLUSIONS: These results provide evidence for the reliability and validity of the CDCA in youth. It appears to measure the discrepancy between Desired and Predicted Control identified in the Revised Iowa Dental Control Index (R-IDCI). Responses of the youth in all three cultures were similar, indicating common dental control preferences for individuals of this age. However, consistent with cultural values, Japanese youth were less likely to endorse the control strategies. These results underline the need to develop culturally-specific, as well as situationally-specific control measures.

AB - AIM: The Child Dental Control Assessment (CDCA) measures children's preferred control strategies in the dental situation. Three studies are reported, assessing aspects of this instrument in youths from the USA, Japan and Australia. In particular, measurements were made as to the reliability and validity of this instrument in this age group in the three cultures, as well as comparing some results across cultures. STUDY DESIGN: These studies used a questionnaire design. METHODS: Questionnaires (including the CDCA and other measures) were given to youths aged 11-15 in the three cultures. In one culture, youths received the questionnaire twice, to compute test-retest reliability. RESULTS: The measure's reliability and validity were similar to those of other measures. The CDCA behaves similarly to the Revised Iowa Dental Control Index (R-IDCI). Youths in all three cultures showed similar responses, although the Japanese were less likely to endorse items. STATISTICS: Internal reliability of the scale ranged from 0.74 to 0.85. Test- retest reliability was 0.74. Participants in the High Desire/Low Predicted classification on the R-IDCI scored higher on the CDCA (t (73) = 2.9, p <.01). In the Japanese and Australian samples the correlation between CDCA and dental fear was 0.29-0.33 (p <.001). The Australian and USA samples scored significantly higher than the Japanese sample (overall F(2,1544) = 383.98, p <.001, followed by Tukey's HSD, p <.001). CONCLUSIONS: These results provide evidence for the reliability and validity of the CDCA in youth. It appears to measure the discrepancy between Desired and Predicted Control identified in the Revised Iowa Dental Control Index (R-IDCI). Responses of the youth in all three cultures were similar, indicating common dental control preferences for individuals of this age. However, consistent with cultural values, Japanese youth were less likely to endorse the control strategies. These results underline the need to develop culturally-specific, as well as situationally-specific control measures.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=32944460178&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=32944460178&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 35

EP - 43

JO - European journal of paediatric dentistry : official journal of European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry

JF - European journal of paediatric dentistry : official journal of European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry

SN - 1591-996X

IS - 1

ER -