Sympathetic stimulation produces a greater increase in both transmural and spatial dispersion of repolarization in LQT1 than LQT2 forms of congenital long QT syndrome

Yasuko Tanabe, Masashi Inagaki, Takashi Kurita, Noritoshi Nagaya, Atsushi Taguchi, Kazuhiro Suyama, Naohiko Aihara, Shiro Kamakura, Kenji Sunagawa, Kazufumi Nakamura, Tohru Ohe, Jeffrey A. Towbin, Silvia G. Priori, Wataru Shimizu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

93 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The study compared the influence of sympathetic stimulation on transmural and spatial dispersion of repolarization between LQT1 and LQT2 forms of congenital long QT syndrome (LQTS). BACKGROUND: Cardiac events are more associated with sympathetic stimulation in LQT1 than in LQT2 or LQT3 syndrome. Experimental studies have suggested that the interval between Tpeak and Tend (Tp-e) in the electrocardiogram (ECG) reflects transmural dispersion of repolarization across the ventricular wall. METHODS: We recorded 87-lead body-surface ECGs before and after epinephrine infusion (0.1 μg/kg/min) in 13 LQT1, 6 LQT2, and 7 control patients. The Q-Tend (QT-e), Q-Tpeak (QT-p), and Tp-e were measured automatically from 87-lead ECGs, corrected by Bazett's method (QTc-e, QTc-p, Tcp-e), and averaged among all 87-leads and among 24-leads, which reflect the potential from the left ventricular free wall. As an index of spatial dispersion of repolarization, the dispersion of QTc-e (QTc-eD) and QTc-p (QTc-pD) were obtained among 87-leads and among 24-leads, and were defined as the interval between the maximum and the minimum of the QTc-e and the QTc-p, respectively. RESULTS: Epinephrine significantly increased the mean QTc-e but not the mean QTc-p, resulting in a significant increase in the mean Tcp-e in both LQT1 and LQT2, but not in control patients. The epinephrine-induced increases in the mean QTc-e and Tcp-e were larger in LQT1 than in LQT2, and were more pronounced when the averaged data were obtained from 24-leads than from 87-leads. Epinephrine increased the maximum QTc-e but not the minimum QTc-e, producing a significant increase in the QTc-eD in both LQT1 and LQT2 patients, but not in control patients. The increase in the QTc-eD was larger in LQT1 than in LQT2 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that sympathetic stimulation produces a greater increase in both transmural and spatial dispersion of repolarization in LQT1 than in LQT2 syndrome, and this may explain why LQT1 patients are more sensitive to sympathetic stimulation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)911-919
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of the American College of Cardiology
Volume37
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 1 2001

Fingerprint

Long QT Syndrome
Epinephrine
Electrocardiography
Lead

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

Sympathetic stimulation produces a greater increase in both transmural and spatial dispersion of repolarization in LQT1 than LQT2 forms of congenital long QT syndrome. / Tanabe, Yasuko; Inagaki, Masashi; Kurita, Takashi; Nagaya, Noritoshi; Taguchi, Atsushi; Suyama, Kazuhiro; Aihara, Naohiko; Kamakura, Shiro; Sunagawa, Kenji; Nakamura, Kazufumi; Ohe, Tohru; Towbin, Jeffrey A.; Priori, Silvia G.; Shimizu, Wataru.

In: Journal of the American College of Cardiology, Vol. 37, No. 3, 01.03.2001, p. 911-919.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tanabe, Y, Inagaki, M, Kurita, T, Nagaya, N, Taguchi, A, Suyama, K, Aihara, N, Kamakura, S, Sunagawa, K, Nakamura, K, Ohe, T, Towbin, JA, Priori, SG & Shimizu, W 2001, 'Sympathetic stimulation produces a greater increase in both transmural and spatial dispersion of repolarization in LQT1 than LQT2 forms of congenital long QT syndrome', Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 911-919. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1097(00)01200-6
Tanabe, Yasuko ; Inagaki, Masashi ; Kurita, Takashi ; Nagaya, Noritoshi ; Taguchi, Atsushi ; Suyama, Kazuhiro ; Aihara, Naohiko ; Kamakura, Shiro ; Sunagawa, Kenji ; Nakamura, Kazufumi ; Ohe, Tohru ; Towbin, Jeffrey A. ; Priori, Silvia G. ; Shimizu, Wataru. / Sympathetic stimulation produces a greater increase in both transmural and spatial dispersion of repolarization in LQT1 than LQT2 forms of congenital long QT syndrome. In: Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2001 ; Vol. 37, No. 3. pp. 911-919.
@article{e96452e7a29444fd90b7627883c327e6,
title = "Sympathetic stimulation produces a greater increase in both transmural and spatial dispersion of repolarization in LQT1 than LQT2 forms of congenital long QT syndrome",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: The study compared the influence of sympathetic stimulation on transmural and spatial dispersion of repolarization between LQT1 and LQT2 forms of congenital long QT syndrome (LQTS). BACKGROUND: Cardiac events are more associated with sympathetic stimulation in LQT1 than in LQT2 or LQT3 syndrome. Experimental studies have suggested that the interval between Tpeak and Tend (Tp-e) in the electrocardiogram (ECG) reflects transmural dispersion of repolarization across the ventricular wall. METHODS: We recorded 87-lead body-surface ECGs before and after epinephrine infusion (0.1 μg/kg/min) in 13 LQT1, 6 LQT2, and 7 control patients. The Q-Tend (QT-e), Q-Tpeak (QT-p), and Tp-e were measured automatically from 87-lead ECGs, corrected by Bazett's method (QTc-e, QTc-p, Tcp-e), and averaged among all 87-leads and among 24-leads, which reflect the potential from the left ventricular free wall. As an index of spatial dispersion of repolarization, the dispersion of QTc-e (QTc-eD) and QTc-p (QTc-pD) were obtained among 87-leads and among 24-leads, and were defined as the interval between the maximum and the minimum of the QTc-e and the QTc-p, respectively. RESULTS: Epinephrine significantly increased the mean QTc-e but not the mean QTc-p, resulting in a significant increase in the mean Tcp-e in both LQT1 and LQT2, but not in control patients. The epinephrine-induced increases in the mean QTc-e and Tcp-e were larger in LQT1 than in LQT2, and were more pronounced when the averaged data were obtained from 24-leads than from 87-leads. Epinephrine increased the maximum QTc-e but not the minimum QTc-e, producing a significant increase in the QTc-eD in both LQT1 and LQT2 patients, but not in control patients. The increase in the QTc-eD was larger in LQT1 than in LQT2 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that sympathetic stimulation produces a greater increase in both transmural and spatial dispersion of repolarization in LQT1 than in LQT2 syndrome, and this may explain why LQT1 patients are more sensitive to sympathetic stimulation.",
author = "Yasuko Tanabe and Masashi Inagaki and Takashi Kurita and Noritoshi Nagaya and Atsushi Taguchi and Kazuhiro Suyama and Naohiko Aihara and Shiro Kamakura and Kenji Sunagawa and Kazufumi Nakamura and Tohru Ohe and Towbin, {Jeffrey A.} and Priori, {Silvia G.} and Wataru Shimizu",
year = "2001",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0735-1097(00)01200-6",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "911--919",
journal = "Journal of the American College of Cardiology",
issn = "0735-1097",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sympathetic stimulation produces a greater increase in both transmural and spatial dispersion of repolarization in LQT1 than LQT2 forms of congenital long QT syndrome

AU - Tanabe, Yasuko

AU - Inagaki, Masashi

AU - Kurita, Takashi

AU - Nagaya, Noritoshi

AU - Taguchi, Atsushi

AU - Suyama, Kazuhiro

AU - Aihara, Naohiko

AU - Kamakura, Shiro

AU - Sunagawa, Kenji

AU - Nakamura, Kazufumi

AU - Ohe, Tohru

AU - Towbin, Jeffrey A.

AU - Priori, Silvia G.

AU - Shimizu, Wataru

PY - 2001/3/1

Y1 - 2001/3/1

N2 - OBJECTIVES: The study compared the influence of sympathetic stimulation on transmural and spatial dispersion of repolarization between LQT1 and LQT2 forms of congenital long QT syndrome (LQTS). BACKGROUND: Cardiac events are more associated with sympathetic stimulation in LQT1 than in LQT2 or LQT3 syndrome. Experimental studies have suggested that the interval between Tpeak and Tend (Tp-e) in the electrocardiogram (ECG) reflects transmural dispersion of repolarization across the ventricular wall. METHODS: We recorded 87-lead body-surface ECGs before and after epinephrine infusion (0.1 μg/kg/min) in 13 LQT1, 6 LQT2, and 7 control patients. The Q-Tend (QT-e), Q-Tpeak (QT-p), and Tp-e were measured automatically from 87-lead ECGs, corrected by Bazett's method (QTc-e, QTc-p, Tcp-e), and averaged among all 87-leads and among 24-leads, which reflect the potential from the left ventricular free wall. As an index of spatial dispersion of repolarization, the dispersion of QTc-e (QTc-eD) and QTc-p (QTc-pD) were obtained among 87-leads and among 24-leads, and were defined as the interval between the maximum and the minimum of the QTc-e and the QTc-p, respectively. RESULTS: Epinephrine significantly increased the mean QTc-e but not the mean QTc-p, resulting in a significant increase in the mean Tcp-e in both LQT1 and LQT2, but not in control patients. The epinephrine-induced increases in the mean QTc-e and Tcp-e were larger in LQT1 than in LQT2, and were more pronounced when the averaged data were obtained from 24-leads than from 87-leads. Epinephrine increased the maximum QTc-e but not the minimum QTc-e, producing a significant increase in the QTc-eD in both LQT1 and LQT2 patients, but not in control patients. The increase in the QTc-eD was larger in LQT1 than in LQT2 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that sympathetic stimulation produces a greater increase in both transmural and spatial dispersion of repolarization in LQT1 than in LQT2 syndrome, and this may explain why LQT1 patients are more sensitive to sympathetic stimulation.

AB - OBJECTIVES: The study compared the influence of sympathetic stimulation on transmural and spatial dispersion of repolarization between LQT1 and LQT2 forms of congenital long QT syndrome (LQTS). BACKGROUND: Cardiac events are more associated with sympathetic stimulation in LQT1 than in LQT2 or LQT3 syndrome. Experimental studies have suggested that the interval between Tpeak and Tend (Tp-e) in the electrocardiogram (ECG) reflects transmural dispersion of repolarization across the ventricular wall. METHODS: We recorded 87-lead body-surface ECGs before and after epinephrine infusion (0.1 μg/kg/min) in 13 LQT1, 6 LQT2, and 7 control patients. The Q-Tend (QT-e), Q-Tpeak (QT-p), and Tp-e were measured automatically from 87-lead ECGs, corrected by Bazett's method (QTc-e, QTc-p, Tcp-e), and averaged among all 87-leads and among 24-leads, which reflect the potential from the left ventricular free wall. As an index of spatial dispersion of repolarization, the dispersion of QTc-e (QTc-eD) and QTc-p (QTc-pD) were obtained among 87-leads and among 24-leads, and were defined as the interval between the maximum and the minimum of the QTc-e and the QTc-p, respectively. RESULTS: Epinephrine significantly increased the mean QTc-e but not the mean QTc-p, resulting in a significant increase in the mean Tcp-e in both LQT1 and LQT2, but not in control patients. The epinephrine-induced increases in the mean QTc-e and Tcp-e were larger in LQT1 than in LQT2, and were more pronounced when the averaged data were obtained from 24-leads than from 87-leads. Epinephrine increased the maximum QTc-e but not the minimum QTc-e, producing a significant increase in the QTc-eD in both LQT1 and LQT2 patients, but not in control patients. The increase in the QTc-eD was larger in LQT1 than in LQT2 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that sympathetic stimulation produces a greater increase in both transmural and spatial dispersion of repolarization in LQT1 than in LQT2 syndrome, and this may explain why LQT1 patients are more sensitive to sympathetic stimulation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035281517&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035281517&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0735-1097(00)01200-6

DO - 10.1016/S0735-1097(00)01200-6

M3 - Article

C2 - 11693770

AN - SCOPUS:0035281517

VL - 37

SP - 911

EP - 919

JO - Journal of the American College of Cardiology

JF - Journal of the American College of Cardiology

SN - 0735-1097

IS - 3

ER -