Subtype-specific metagene-based prediction of outcome after neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment in breast cancer

Maurizio Callari, Vera Cappelletti, Francesca D'Aiuto, Valeria Musella, Antonio Lembo, Fabien Petel, Thomas Karn, Takayuki Iwamoto, Paolo Provero, Maria Grazia Daidone, Luca Gianni, Giampaolo Bianchini

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

48 Citations (Scopus)


Purpose: In spite of improvements of average benefit from adjuvant/neoadjuvant treatments, there are still individual patients with early breast cancer at high risk of relapse. We explored the association with outcome of robust gene cluster based metagenes linked to proliferation, ER-related genes, and immune response to identify those high-risk patients. Experimental Design: A total of 3,847 publicly available geneexpression profiles were analyzed (untreated, N = 826; tamoxifen- treated, N = 685; chemotherapy-treated, N = 1,150). Genes poorly performing in formalin-fixed samples were removed. Outcomes of interest were pathologic-complete response (PCR) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS). In ERHER2, the proliferation and ER-related metagenes were combined to define three risk groups. In HER2 and ER HER2 risk groups were defined by tertiles of an immune-related metagene. Results: The high-proliferation/low-ER group of ERHER2 breast cancer had significantly higher PCR rate [OR, 5.01 (1.76 17.99), P = 0.005], but poorer outcome [HR = 3.73 (1.638.51), P = 0.0018] than the low-proliferation/high-ER. A similar association with outcome applied to patients with residual disease (RD) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (P = 0.01). In ER HER2 and HER2 breast cancer, immune metagene in the high tertile was linked to higher PCR [33.7% vs. 11.6% in high and low tertile, respectively; OR, 3.87 (1.798.95); P = 0.0009]. In ER HER2, after adjuvant/neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 5-year DMFS was 85.4% for high-tertile immune metagene, and 43.9% for low tertile. The outcome association was similar in patients with RD (P = 0.0055). In HER2 breast cancer treated with chemotherapy the association with risk of relapse was not significant. Conclusions: Wedeveloped metagene-based predictors able to define low and high risk of relapse after adjuvant/neoadjuvant therapy. High-risk patients so defined should be preferably considered for trials with investigational agents.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)337-345
Number of pages9
JournalClinical Cancer Research
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - Jan 15 2016

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research


Dive into the research topics of 'Subtype-specific metagene-based prediction of outcome after neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment in breast cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this