Study on character input methods using eye-gaze input interface

Atsuo Murata, Kazuya Hayashi, Makoto Moriwaka, Takehito Hayami

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Four character input methods for eye-gaze input interface were compared from the viewpoints of input speed, input accuracy, and subjective rating on ease of input and fatigue. Four input methods included (1) I-QGSM(vertical), (2)I-QGSM(circle), (3)eye-fixation method, and (4)screen button. While the eye-fixation method (3) led to faster input, the I-QGSM (vertical) led to fewer errors. In conclusion, it is difficult to develop character input method that satisfies both speed and accuracy.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the SICE Annual Conference
Pages1402-1407
Number of pages6
Publication statusPublished - 2012
Event2012 51st Annual Conference on of the Society of Instrument and Control Engineers of Japan, SICE 2012 - Akita, Japan
Duration: Aug 20 2012Aug 23 2012

Other

Other2012 51st Annual Conference on of the Society of Instrument and Control Engineers of Japan, SICE 2012
CountryJapan
CityAkita
Period8/20/128/23/12

Fingerprint

Fatigue of materials

Keywords

  • accuracy
  • character input
  • eye-fixation
  • eye-gaze input system
  • I-QGSM
  • speed

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering
  • Control and Systems Engineering
  • Computer Science Applications

Cite this

Murata, A., Hayashi, K., Moriwaka, M., & Hayami, T. (2012). Study on character input methods using eye-gaze input interface. In Proceedings of the SICE Annual Conference (pp. 1402-1407). [6318668]

Study on character input methods using eye-gaze input interface. / Murata, Atsuo; Hayashi, Kazuya; Moriwaka, Makoto; Hayami, Takehito.

Proceedings of the SICE Annual Conference. 2012. p. 1402-1407 6318668.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Murata, A, Hayashi, K, Moriwaka, M & Hayami, T 2012, Study on character input methods using eye-gaze input interface. in Proceedings of the SICE Annual Conference., 6318668, pp. 1402-1407, 2012 51st Annual Conference on of the Society of Instrument and Control Engineers of Japan, SICE 2012, Akita, Japan, 8/20/12.
Murata A, Hayashi K, Moriwaka M, Hayami T. Study on character input methods using eye-gaze input interface. In Proceedings of the SICE Annual Conference. 2012. p. 1402-1407. 6318668
Murata, Atsuo ; Hayashi, Kazuya ; Moriwaka, Makoto ; Hayami, Takehito. / Study on character input methods using eye-gaze input interface. Proceedings of the SICE Annual Conference. 2012. pp. 1402-1407
@inproceedings{a4fe6f7a77314cdc904bc5be9f1f99fe,
title = "Study on character input methods using eye-gaze input interface",
abstract = "Four character input methods for eye-gaze input interface were compared from the viewpoints of input speed, input accuracy, and subjective rating on ease of input and fatigue. Four input methods included (1) I-QGSM(vertical), (2)I-QGSM(circle), (3)eye-fixation method, and (4)screen button. While the eye-fixation method (3) led to faster input, the I-QGSM (vertical) led to fewer errors. In conclusion, it is difficult to develop character input method that satisfies both speed and accuracy.",
keywords = "accuracy, character input, eye-fixation, eye-gaze input system, I-QGSM, speed",
author = "Atsuo Murata and Kazuya Hayashi and Makoto Moriwaka and Takehito Hayami",
year = "2012",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781467322591",
pages = "1402--1407",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the SICE Annual Conference",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Study on character input methods using eye-gaze input interface

AU - Murata, Atsuo

AU - Hayashi, Kazuya

AU - Moriwaka, Makoto

AU - Hayami, Takehito

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Four character input methods for eye-gaze input interface were compared from the viewpoints of input speed, input accuracy, and subjective rating on ease of input and fatigue. Four input methods included (1) I-QGSM(vertical), (2)I-QGSM(circle), (3)eye-fixation method, and (4)screen button. While the eye-fixation method (3) led to faster input, the I-QGSM (vertical) led to fewer errors. In conclusion, it is difficult to develop character input method that satisfies both speed and accuracy.

AB - Four character input methods for eye-gaze input interface were compared from the viewpoints of input speed, input accuracy, and subjective rating on ease of input and fatigue. Four input methods included (1) I-QGSM(vertical), (2)I-QGSM(circle), (3)eye-fixation method, and (4)screen button. While the eye-fixation method (3) led to faster input, the I-QGSM (vertical) led to fewer errors. In conclusion, it is difficult to develop character input method that satisfies both speed and accuracy.

KW - accuracy

KW - character input

KW - eye-fixation

KW - eye-gaze input system

KW - I-QGSM

KW - speed

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84869476275&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84869476275&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:84869476275

SN - 9781467322591

SP - 1402

EP - 1407

BT - Proceedings of the SICE Annual Conference

ER -