Standing variation boosted by multiple sources of introduction contributes to the success of the introduced species, Lotus corniculatus

M. Mimura, K. Ono, K. Goka, T. Hara

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although ecological differences between native and introduced ranges have been considered to drive rapid expansion of invasive species, recent studies suggest that rapid evolutionary responses of invasive species to local environments may also be common. Such expansion across heterogeneous environments by adaptation to local habitats requires genetic variation. In this study, we investigated the source and role of standing variation in successful invasion of heterogeneous abiotic environments in a self-incompatible species, Lotus corniculatus. We compared phenotypic and genetic variation among cultivars, natives, and introduced genotypes, and found substantial genetic variation within both native and introduced populations. Introduced populations possessed genotypes derived from both cultivars and native populations, and had lower population differentiation, indicating multiple sources of introduction and population admixture among the sources in the introduced range. Both cultivars and introduced populations had similarly outperforming phenotypes on average, with increased biomass and earlier flowering compared with native populations, but those phenotypes were within the range of the variation in phenotypes of the native populations. In addition, clinal variation within introduced populations was detected along a climatic gradient. Multiple introductions from different sources, including cultivars, may have contributed to pre-adaptive standing variation in the current introduced populations. We conclude that both introduction of cultivar genotypes and natural selection in local environments contributed to current patterns of genetic and phenotypic variation observed in the introduced populations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2743-2754
Number of pages12
JournalBiological Invasions
Volume15
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 1 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Lotus corniculatus
introduced species
cultivar
genetic variation
phenotype
genotype
invasive species
cultivars
natural selection
flowering
phenotypic variation
biomass
habitat

Keywords

  • Adaptation
  • Common garden experiment
  • Cultivar
  • Genetic diversity
  • Invasion
  • Standing variation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Ecology

Cite this

Standing variation boosted by multiple sources of introduction contributes to the success of the introduced species, Lotus corniculatus. / Mimura, M.; Ono, K.; Goka, K.; Hara, T.

In: Biological Invasions, Vol. 15, No. 12, 01.12.2013, p. 2743-2754.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ec2e1d38eb6d473e93f5dd97c083733e,
title = "Standing variation boosted by multiple sources of introduction contributes to the success of the introduced species, Lotus corniculatus",
abstract = "Although ecological differences between native and introduced ranges have been considered to drive rapid expansion of invasive species, recent studies suggest that rapid evolutionary responses of invasive species to local environments may also be common. Such expansion across heterogeneous environments by adaptation to local habitats requires genetic variation. In this study, we investigated the source and role of standing variation in successful invasion of heterogeneous abiotic environments in a self-incompatible species, Lotus corniculatus. We compared phenotypic and genetic variation among cultivars, natives, and introduced genotypes, and found substantial genetic variation within both native and introduced populations. Introduced populations possessed genotypes derived from both cultivars and native populations, and had lower population differentiation, indicating multiple sources of introduction and population admixture among the sources in the introduced range. Both cultivars and introduced populations had similarly outperforming phenotypes on average, with increased biomass and earlier flowering compared with native populations, but those phenotypes were within the range of the variation in phenotypes of the native populations. In addition, clinal variation within introduced populations was detected along a climatic gradient. Multiple introductions from different sources, including cultivars, may have contributed to pre-adaptive standing variation in the current introduced populations. We conclude that both introduction of cultivar genotypes and natural selection in local environments contributed to current patterns of genetic and phenotypic variation observed in the introduced populations.",
keywords = "Adaptation, Common garden experiment, Cultivar, Genetic diversity, Invasion, Standing variation",
author = "M. Mimura and K. Ono and K. Goka and T. Hara",
year = "2013",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10530-013-0488-x",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "2743--2754",
journal = "Biological Invasions",
issn = "1387-3547",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Standing variation boosted by multiple sources of introduction contributes to the success of the introduced species, Lotus corniculatus

AU - Mimura, M.

AU - Ono, K.

AU - Goka, K.

AU - Hara, T.

PY - 2013/12/1

Y1 - 2013/12/1

N2 - Although ecological differences between native and introduced ranges have been considered to drive rapid expansion of invasive species, recent studies suggest that rapid evolutionary responses of invasive species to local environments may also be common. Such expansion across heterogeneous environments by adaptation to local habitats requires genetic variation. In this study, we investigated the source and role of standing variation in successful invasion of heterogeneous abiotic environments in a self-incompatible species, Lotus corniculatus. We compared phenotypic and genetic variation among cultivars, natives, and introduced genotypes, and found substantial genetic variation within both native and introduced populations. Introduced populations possessed genotypes derived from both cultivars and native populations, and had lower population differentiation, indicating multiple sources of introduction and population admixture among the sources in the introduced range. Both cultivars and introduced populations had similarly outperforming phenotypes on average, with increased biomass and earlier flowering compared with native populations, but those phenotypes were within the range of the variation in phenotypes of the native populations. In addition, clinal variation within introduced populations was detected along a climatic gradient. Multiple introductions from different sources, including cultivars, may have contributed to pre-adaptive standing variation in the current introduced populations. We conclude that both introduction of cultivar genotypes and natural selection in local environments contributed to current patterns of genetic and phenotypic variation observed in the introduced populations.

AB - Although ecological differences between native and introduced ranges have been considered to drive rapid expansion of invasive species, recent studies suggest that rapid evolutionary responses of invasive species to local environments may also be common. Such expansion across heterogeneous environments by adaptation to local habitats requires genetic variation. In this study, we investigated the source and role of standing variation in successful invasion of heterogeneous abiotic environments in a self-incompatible species, Lotus corniculatus. We compared phenotypic and genetic variation among cultivars, natives, and introduced genotypes, and found substantial genetic variation within both native and introduced populations. Introduced populations possessed genotypes derived from both cultivars and native populations, and had lower population differentiation, indicating multiple sources of introduction and population admixture among the sources in the introduced range. Both cultivars and introduced populations had similarly outperforming phenotypes on average, with increased biomass and earlier flowering compared with native populations, but those phenotypes were within the range of the variation in phenotypes of the native populations. In addition, clinal variation within introduced populations was detected along a climatic gradient. Multiple introductions from different sources, including cultivars, may have contributed to pre-adaptive standing variation in the current introduced populations. We conclude that both introduction of cultivar genotypes and natural selection in local environments contributed to current patterns of genetic and phenotypic variation observed in the introduced populations.

KW - Adaptation

KW - Common garden experiment

KW - Cultivar

KW - Genetic diversity

KW - Invasion

KW - Standing variation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84888019489&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84888019489&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10530-013-0488-x

DO - 10.1007/s10530-013-0488-x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84888019489

VL - 15

SP - 2743

EP - 2754

JO - Biological Invasions

JF - Biological Invasions

SN - 1387-3547

IS - 12

ER -