Spinal kinematics and facet load transmission after total disc replacement

Tomoyuki Takigawa, Alejandro A. Espinoza Orías, Howard S. An, Satoshi Gohgi, Ranjith K. Udayakumar, Keizo Sugisaki, Raghu N. Natarajan, Markus A. Wimmer, Nozomu Inoue

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Study Design: In vitro human cadaveric biomechanical study. Objective: The objectives were to determine the effect of total disc replacement (TDR) on kinematics, especially range of motion (ROM), helical axis of motion (HAM), and facet joint contact force. Summary Of Background Data: Ball-and-socket type artificial discs are designed to mimic normal motion, but the biomechanical effect on kinematics has not been thoroughly clarified. Methods: Fourteen human cadaveric L4-L5 units were tested before and after TDR. In 7 specimens, facet contact forces were directly measured with thin-film piezoresistive load transducers inserted in the facet joints. In the other 7 specimens, the facet joint capsules were kept intact. Moments (±7.5 Nm) were applied in flexion/extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation motion, with and without an axial compressive preload of 400 N. Three-dimensional motion was recorded, and each angular ROM and HAM were calculated. Results: Without axial compressive preload, the TDR did not produce significant differences in ROMs in all cases. However, under compressive preload, the TDR produced significantly larger ROMs for flexion (4.0° and 8.7°) and lateral bending (2.4° and 5.6°) (intact state and TDR, respectively). The TDR did not alter the HAM significantly except the location in lateral bending without compressive preload and the orientation in flexion/extension against horizontal plane. The location of HAM was slightly shifted caudally by the compressive preload in intact and TDR states. Despite the increased ROMs, the facet contact forces were not significantly altered by the TDR either with or without compressive preload (26 N and 27 N in extension, 41 N and 41 N in lateral bending, 117 N and 126 N in axial rotation). Conclusion: TDR using a ball-and-socket type artificial disc significantly increased ROM under axial load and maintained the HAM with similar facet contact forces to the intact state.

Original languageEnglish
JournalSpine
Volume35
Issue number22
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 15 2010

Fingerprint

Total Disc Replacement
Biomechanical Phenomena
Zygapophyseal Joint
Articular Range of Motion
Joint Capsule
Transducers

Keywords

  • biomechanics
  • facet contact force
  • lumbar spine
  • metal-on-metal
  • total disc replacement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Takigawa, T., Espinoza Orías, A. A., An, H. S., Gohgi, S., Udayakumar, R. K., Sugisaki, K., ... Inoue, N. (2010). Spinal kinematics and facet load transmission after total disc replacement. Spine, 35(22). https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181e5352d

Spinal kinematics and facet load transmission after total disc replacement. / Takigawa, Tomoyuki; Espinoza Orías, Alejandro A.; An, Howard S.; Gohgi, Satoshi; Udayakumar, Ranjith K.; Sugisaki, Keizo; Natarajan, Raghu N.; Wimmer, Markus A.; Inoue, Nozomu.

In: Spine, Vol. 35, No. 22, 15.10.2010.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Takigawa, T, Espinoza Orías, AA, An, HS, Gohgi, S, Udayakumar, RK, Sugisaki, K, Natarajan, RN, Wimmer, MA & Inoue, N 2010, 'Spinal kinematics and facet load transmission after total disc replacement', Spine, vol. 35, no. 22. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181e5352d
Takigawa T, Espinoza Orías AA, An HS, Gohgi S, Udayakumar RK, Sugisaki K et al. Spinal kinematics and facet load transmission after total disc replacement. Spine. 2010 Oct 15;35(22). https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181e5352d
Takigawa, Tomoyuki ; Espinoza Orías, Alejandro A. ; An, Howard S. ; Gohgi, Satoshi ; Udayakumar, Ranjith K. ; Sugisaki, Keizo ; Natarajan, Raghu N. ; Wimmer, Markus A. ; Inoue, Nozomu. / Spinal kinematics and facet load transmission after total disc replacement. In: Spine. 2010 ; Vol. 35, No. 22.
@article{ba742bc5c93c4ef6b862ac3866cbe1df,
title = "Spinal kinematics and facet load transmission after total disc replacement",
abstract = "Study Design: In vitro human cadaveric biomechanical study. Objective: The objectives were to determine the effect of total disc replacement (TDR) on kinematics, especially range of motion (ROM), helical axis of motion (HAM), and facet joint contact force. Summary Of Background Data: Ball-and-socket type artificial discs are designed to mimic normal motion, but the biomechanical effect on kinematics has not been thoroughly clarified. Methods: Fourteen human cadaveric L4-L5 units were tested before and after TDR. In 7 specimens, facet contact forces were directly measured with thin-film piezoresistive load transducers inserted in the facet joints. In the other 7 specimens, the facet joint capsules were kept intact. Moments (±7.5 Nm) were applied in flexion/extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation motion, with and without an axial compressive preload of 400 N. Three-dimensional motion was recorded, and each angular ROM and HAM were calculated. Results: Without axial compressive preload, the TDR did not produce significant differences in ROMs in all cases. However, under compressive preload, the TDR produced significantly larger ROMs for flexion (4.0° and 8.7°) and lateral bending (2.4° and 5.6°) (intact state and TDR, respectively). The TDR did not alter the HAM significantly except the location in lateral bending without compressive preload and the orientation in flexion/extension against horizontal plane. The location of HAM was slightly shifted caudally by the compressive preload in intact and TDR states. Despite the increased ROMs, the facet contact forces were not significantly altered by the TDR either with or without compressive preload (26 N and 27 N in extension, 41 N and 41 N in lateral bending, 117 N and 126 N in axial rotation). Conclusion: TDR using a ball-and-socket type artificial disc significantly increased ROM under axial load and maintained the HAM with similar facet contact forces to the intact state.",
keywords = "biomechanics, facet contact force, lumbar spine, metal-on-metal, total disc replacement",
author = "Tomoyuki Takigawa and {Espinoza Or{\'i}as}, {Alejandro A.} and An, {Howard S.} and Satoshi Gohgi and Udayakumar, {Ranjith K.} and Keizo Sugisaki and Natarajan, {Raghu N.} and Wimmer, {Markus A.} and Nozomu Inoue",
year = "2010",
month = "10",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181e5352d",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
journal = "Spine",
issn = "0362-2436",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "22",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Spinal kinematics and facet load transmission after total disc replacement

AU - Takigawa, Tomoyuki

AU - Espinoza Orías, Alejandro A.

AU - An, Howard S.

AU - Gohgi, Satoshi

AU - Udayakumar, Ranjith K.

AU - Sugisaki, Keizo

AU - Natarajan, Raghu N.

AU - Wimmer, Markus A.

AU - Inoue, Nozomu

PY - 2010/10/15

Y1 - 2010/10/15

N2 - Study Design: In vitro human cadaveric biomechanical study. Objective: The objectives were to determine the effect of total disc replacement (TDR) on kinematics, especially range of motion (ROM), helical axis of motion (HAM), and facet joint contact force. Summary Of Background Data: Ball-and-socket type artificial discs are designed to mimic normal motion, but the biomechanical effect on kinematics has not been thoroughly clarified. Methods: Fourteen human cadaveric L4-L5 units were tested before and after TDR. In 7 specimens, facet contact forces were directly measured with thin-film piezoresistive load transducers inserted in the facet joints. In the other 7 specimens, the facet joint capsules were kept intact. Moments (±7.5 Nm) were applied in flexion/extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation motion, with and without an axial compressive preload of 400 N. Three-dimensional motion was recorded, and each angular ROM and HAM were calculated. Results: Without axial compressive preload, the TDR did not produce significant differences in ROMs in all cases. However, under compressive preload, the TDR produced significantly larger ROMs for flexion (4.0° and 8.7°) and lateral bending (2.4° and 5.6°) (intact state and TDR, respectively). The TDR did not alter the HAM significantly except the location in lateral bending without compressive preload and the orientation in flexion/extension against horizontal plane. The location of HAM was slightly shifted caudally by the compressive preload in intact and TDR states. Despite the increased ROMs, the facet contact forces were not significantly altered by the TDR either with or without compressive preload (26 N and 27 N in extension, 41 N and 41 N in lateral bending, 117 N and 126 N in axial rotation). Conclusion: TDR using a ball-and-socket type artificial disc significantly increased ROM under axial load and maintained the HAM with similar facet contact forces to the intact state.

AB - Study Design: In vitro human cadaveric biomechanical study. Objective: The objectives were to determine the effect of total disc replacement (TDR) on kinematics, especially range of motion (ROM), helical axis of motion (HAM), and facet joint contact force. Summary Of Background Data: Ball-and-socket type artificial discs are designed to mimic normal motion, but the biomechanical effect on kinematics has not been thoroughly clarified. Methods: Fourteen human cadaveric L4-L5 units were tested before and after TDR. In 7 specimens, facet contact forces were directly measured with thin-film piezoresistive load transducers inserted in the facet joints. In the other 7 specimens, the facet joint capsules were kept intact. Moments (±7.5 Nm) were applied in flexion/extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation motion, with and without an axial compressive preload of 400 N. Three-dimensional motion was recorded, and each angular ROM and HAM were calculated. Results: Without axial compressive preload, the TDR did not produce significant differences in ROMs in all cases. However, under compressive preload, the TDR produced significantly larger ROMs for flexion (4.0° and 8.7°) and lateral bending (2.4° and 5.6°) (intact state and TDR, respectively). The TDR did not alter the HAM significantly except the location in lateral bending without compressive preload and the orientation in flexion/extension against horizontal plane. The location of HAM was slightly shifted caudally by the compressive preload in intact and TDR states. Despite the increased ROMs, the facet contact forces were not significantly altered by the TDR either with or without compressive preload (26 N and 27 N in extension, 41 N and 41 N in lateral bending, 117 N and 126 N in axial rotation). Conclusion: TDR using a ball-and-socket type artificial disc significantly increased ROM under axial load and maintained the HAM with similar facet contact forces to the intact state.

KW - biomechanics

KW - facet contact force

KW - lumbar spine

KW - metal-on-metal

KW - total disc replacement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78149282407&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78149282407&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181e5352d

DO - 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181e5352d

M3 - Article

C2 - 20881657

AN - SCOPUS:78149282407

VL - 35

JO - Spine

JF - Spine

SN - 0362-2436

IS - 22

ER -