Societal Preferences for Interventions with the Same Efficiency

Assessment and Application to Decision Making

Takeru Shiroiwa, Shinya Saito, Kojiro Shimozuma, Satoshi Kodama, Shinichi Noto, Takashi Fukuda

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Although quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) may not completely reflect the value of a healthcare technology, it remains unclear how to adjust the cost per QALY threshold. First, the present study compares two survey methods of measuring people’s preferences for a specific healthcare technology when each choice has the same efficiency. The second objective was to consider how this information regarding preferences could be used in decision making. Methods: We conducted single-attribute (budget allocation) and multi-attribute (discrete-choice) experiments to survey public medical care preferences. Approximately 1000 respondents were sampled for each experiment. Six questions were prepared to address the attributes included in the study: (a) age; (b) objective of care; (c) disease severity; (d) prior medical care; (e) cause of disease; and (f) disease frequency. For the discrete-choice experiment (a) age, (b) objective of care, (c) disease severity, and (d) prior medical care were orthogonally combined. All assumed medical care had the same costs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER; cost per life-year or QALY). We also calculated the preference-adjusted threshold (PAT) to reflect people’s preferences in a threshold range. Results: The results of both experiments revealed similar preferences: intervention for younger patients was strongly preferred, followed by interventions for treatment and severe disease states being preferred, despite the same cost per life-year or QALY. The single-attribute experiment revealed that many people prefer an option in which resources are equally allocated between two interventions. Marginal PATs were calculated for age, objective of care, disease severity, and prior medical care. Conclusion: The single- and multi-attribute experiments revealed similar preferences. PAT can reflect people’s preferences within the decision-maker’s threshold range in a numerical manner.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)375-385
Number of pages11
JournalApplied Health Economics and Health Policy
Volume14
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Decision Making
Quality-Adjusted Life Years
Costs and Cost Analysis
Technology
Delivery of Health Care
Budgets
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Decision making
Medical care
Quality-adjusted life years
Costs
Experiment
Surveys and Questionnaires
Severity
Discrete choice experiment
Healthcare
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Health Policy

Cite this

Societal Preferences for Interventions with the Same Efficiency : Assessment and Application to Decision Making. / Shiroiwa, Takeru; Saito, Shinya; Shimozuma, Kojiro; Kodama, Satoshi; Noto, Shinichi; Fukuda, Takashi.

In: Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Vol. 14, No. 3, 2016, p. 375-385.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Shiroiwa, Takeru ; Saito, Shinya ; Shimozuma, Kojiro ; Kodama, Satoshi ; Noto, Shinichi ; Fukuda, Takashi. / Societal Preferences for Interventions with the Same Efficiency : Assessment and Application to Decision Making. In: Applied Health Economics and Health Policy. 2016 ; Vol. 14, No. 3. pp. 375-385.
@article{b639e530154d48d08137c667f2be33f9,
title = "Societal Preferences for Interventions with the Same Efficiency: Assessment and Application to Decision Making",
abstract = "Background and Objectives: Although quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) may not completely reflect the value of a healthcare technology, it remains unclear how to adjust the cost per QALY threshold. First, the present study compares two survey methods of measuring people’s preferences for a specific healthcare technology when each choice has the same efficiency. The second objective was to consider how this information regarding preferences could be used in decision making. Methods: We conducted single-attribute (budget allocation) and multi-attribute (discrete-choice) experiments to survey public medical care preferences. Approximately 1000 respondents were sampled for each experiment. Six questions were prepared to address the attributes included in the study: (a) age; (b) objective of care; (c) disease severity; (d) prior medical care; (e) cause of disease; and (f) disease frequency. For the discrete-choice experiment (a) age, (b) objective of care, (c) disease severity, and (d) prior medical care were orthogonally combined. All assumed medical care had the same costs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER; cost per life-year or QALY). We also calculated the preference-adjusted threshold (PAT) to reflect people’s preferences in a threshold range. Results: The results of both experiments revealed similar preferences: intervention for younger patients was strongly preferred, followed by interventions for treatment and severe disease states being preferred, despite the same cost per life-year or QALY. The single-attribute experiment revealed that many people prefer an option in which resources are equally allocated between two interventions. Marginal PATs were calculated for age, objective of care, disease severity, and prior medical care. Conclusion: The single- and multi-attribute experiments revealed similar preferences. PAT can reflect people’s preferences within the decision-maker’s threshold range in a numerical manner.",
author = "Takeru Shiroiwa and Shinya Saito and Kojiro Shimozuma and Satoshi Kodama and Shinichi Noto and Takashi Fukuda",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1007/s40258-016-0236-3",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "375--385",
journal = "Applied Health Economics and Health Policy",
issn = "1175-5652",
publisher = "Adis International Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Societal Preferences for Interventions with the Same Efficiency

T2 - Assessment and Application to Decision Making

AU - Shiroiwa, Takeru

AU - Saito, Shinya

AU - Shimozuma, Kojiro

AU - Kodama, Satoshi

AU - Noto, Shinichi

AU - Fukuda, Takashi

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Background and Objectives: Although quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) may not completely reflect the value of a healthcare technology, it remains unclear how to adjust the cost per QALY threshold. First, the present study compares two survey methods of measuring people’s preferences for a specific healthcare technology when each choice has the same efficiency. The second objective was to consider how this information regarding preferences could be used in decision making. Methods: We conducted single-attribute (budget allocation) and multi-attribute (discrete-choice) experiments to survey public medical care preferences. Approximately 1000 respondents were sampled for each experiment. Six questions were prepared to address the attributes included in the study: (a) age; (b) objective of care; (c) disease severity; (d) prior medical care; (e) cause of disease; and (f) disease frequency. For the discrete-choice experiment (a) age, (b) objective of care, (c) disease severity, and (d) prior medical care were orthogonally combined. All assumed medical care had the same costs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER; cost per life-year or QALY). We also calculated the preference-adjusted threshold (PAT) to reflect people’s preferences in a threshold range. Results: The results of both experiments revealed similar preferences: intervention for younger patients was strongly preferred, followed by interventions for treatment and severe disease states being preferred, despite the same cost per life-year or QALY. The single-attribute experiment revealed that many people prefer an option in which resources are equally allocated between two interventions. Marginal PATs were calculated for age, objective of care, disease severity, and prior medical care. Conclusion: The single- and multi-attribute experiments revealed similar preferences. PAT can reflect people’s preferences within the decision-maker’s threshold range in a numerical manner.

AB - Background and Objectives: Although quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) may not completely reflect the value of a healthcare technology, it remains unclear how to adjust the cost per QALY threshold. First, the present study compares two survey methods of measuring people’s preferences for a specific healthcare technology when each choice has the same efficiency. The second objective was to consider how this information regarding preferences could be used in decision making. Methods: We conducted single-attribute (budget allocation) and multi-attribute (discrete-choice) experiments to survey public medical care preferences. Approximately 1000 respondents were sampled for each experiment. Six questions were prepared to address the attributes included in the study: (a) age; (b) objective of care; (c) disease severity; (d) prior medical care; (e) cause of disease; and (f) disease frequency. For the discrete-choice experiment (a) age, (b) objective of care, (c) disease severity, and (d) prior medical care were orthogonally combined. All assumed medical care had the same costs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER; cost per life-year or QALY). We also calculated the preference-adjusted threshold (PAT) to reflect people’s preferences in a threshold range. Results: The results of both experiments revealed similar preferences: intervention for younger patients was strongly preferred, followed by interventions for treatment and severe disease states being preferred, despite the same cost per life-year or QALY. The single-attribute experiment revealed that many people prefer an option in which resources are equally allocated between two interventions. Marginal PATs were calculated for age, objective of care, disease severity, and prior medical care. Conclusion: The single- and multi-attribute experiments revealed similar preferences. PAT can reflect people’s preferences within the decision-maker’s threshold range in a numerical manner.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84960089278&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84960089278&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s40258-016-0236-3

DO - 10.1007/s40258-016-0236-3

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 375

EP - 385

JO - Applied Health Economics and Health Policy

JF - Applied Health Economics and Health Policy

SN - 1175-5652

IS - 3

ER -