Secondary head and neck reconstruction using free flap to improve the postoperative function or appearance of cancer survivors

Satoshi Onoda, Yoshihiro Kimata, Narushi Sugiyama, Tomoo Onoda, Nobuyoshi Mizukawa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Secondary reconstructive operations are needed when patients with head and neck cancers have complications such as tumor recurrence after initial treatment. These1 reconstructive procedures are also performed to improve the function and appearance of the head and neck region for many cancer survivors. We reviewed the patients who underwent secondary head and neck reconstruction to improve function and appearance and considered the significance of this procedure for cancer survivors, as well as its associated problems. Methods Among the secondary reconstruction patients, 20 patients underwent reconstruction to improve their function and/or appearance. The goal of reconstruction for the patients was functional improvement in eight cases, appearance improvement in ten cases, and both function and appearance in two cases. Chi-square analyses were performed between the secondary and primary reconstructive groups with regard to the incidence of postoperative complications. Results All transferred flaps survived completely. We performed a small postoperative modification procedure in four cases. Minor complications not requiring surgical correction occurred in 2 of 20 patients. Additional operations were required owing to major postoperative complications in 2 of 20 patients. No significant associations were identified between the secondary and primary reconstructive groups with regard to postoperative complications. Conclusion The outcomes of the present report suggest that secondary reconstructive surgery is a relatively safe procedure. The decision to perform adaptation operations depends on various factors after sufficient discussion with patients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)122-128
Number of pages7
JournalMicrosurgery
Volume34
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2014

Fingerprint

Free Tissue Flaps
Survivors
Neck
Head
Neoplasms
Reconstructive Surgical Procedures
Postoperative Care
Head and Neck Neoplasms
Recurrence
Incidence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Secondary head and neck reconstruction using free flap to improve the postoperative function or appearance of cancer survivors. / Onoda, Satoshi; Kimata, Yoshihiro; Sugiyama, Narushi; Onoda, Tomoo; Mizukawa, Nobuyoshi.

In: Microsurgery, Vol. 34, No. 2, 02.2014, p. 122-128.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a730e530e12c40d1835eeef7703ae75d,
title = "Secondary head and neck reconstruction using free flap to improve the postoperative function or appearance of cancer survivors",
abstract = "Background Secondary reconstructive operations are needed when patients with head and neck cancers have complications such as tumor recurrence after initial treatment. These1 reconstructive procedures are also performed to improve the function and appearance of the head and neck region for many cancer survivors. We reviewed the patients who underwent secondary head and neck reconstruction to improve function and appearance and considered the significance of this procedure for cancer survivors, as well as its associated problems. Methods Among the secondary reconstruction patients, 20 patients underwent reconstruction to improve their function and/or appearance. The goal of reconstruction for the patients was functional improvement in eight cases, appearance improvement in ten cases, and both function and appearance in two cases. Chi-square analyses were performed between the secondary and primary reconstructive groups with regard to the incidence of postoperative complications. Results All transferred flaps survived completely. We performed a small postoperative modification procedure in four cases. Minor complications not requiring surgical correction occurred in 2 of 20 patients. Additional operations were required owing to major postoperative complications in 2 of 20 patients. No significant associations were identified between the secondary and primary reconstructive groups with regard to postoperative complications. Conclusion The outcomes of the present report suggest that secondary reconstructive surgery is a relatively safe procedure. The decision to perform adaptation operations depends on various factors after sufficient discussion with patients.",
author = "Satoshi Onoda and Yoshihiro Kimata and Narushi Sugiyama and Tomoo Onoda and Nobuyoshi Mizukawa",
year = "2014",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1002/micr.22157",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "122--128",
journal = "Microsurgery",
issn = "0738-1085",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Secondary head and neck reconstruction using free flap to improve the postoperative function or appearance of cancer survivors

AU - Onoda, Satoshi

AU - Kimata, Yoshihiro

AU - Sugiyama, Narushi

AU - Onoda, Tomoo

AU - Mizukawa, Nobuyoshi

PY - 2014/2

Y1 - 2014/2

N2 - Background Secondary reconstructive operations are needed when patients with head and neck cancers have complications such as tumor recurrence after initial treatment. These1 reconstructive procedures are also performed to improve the function and appearance of the head and neck region for many cancer survivors. We reviewed the patients who underwent secondary head and neck reconstruction to improve function and appearance and considered the significance of this procedure for cancer survivors, as well as its associated problems. Methods Among the secondary reconstruction patients, 20 patients underwent reconstruction to improve their function and/or appearance. The goal of reconstruction for the patients was functional improvement in eight cases, appearance improvement in ten cases, and both function and appearance in two cases. Chi-square analyses were performed between the secondary and primary reconstructive groups with regard to the incidence of postoperative complications. Results All transferred flaps survived completely. We performed a small postoperative modification procedure in four cases. Minor complications not requiring surgical correction occurred in 2 of 20 patients. Additional operations were required owing to major postoperative complications in 2 of 20 patients. No significant associations were identified between the secondary and primary reconstructive groups with regard to postoperative complications. Conclusion The outcomes of the present report suggest that secondary reconstructive surgery is a relatively safe procedure. The decision to perform adaptation operations depends on various factors after sufficient discussion with patients.

AB - Background Secondary reconstructive operations are needed when patients with head and neck cancers have complications such as tumor recurrence after initial treatment. These1 reconstructive procedures are also performed to improve the function and appearance of the head and neck region for many cancer survivors. We reviewed the patients who underwent secondary head and neck reconstruction to improve function and appearance and considered the significance of this procedure for cancer survivors, as well as its associated problems. Methods Among the secondary reconstruction patients, 20 patients underwent reconstruction to improve their function and/or appearance. The goal of reconstruction for the patients was functional improvement in eight cases, appearance improvement in ten cases, and both function and appearance in two cases. Chi-square analyses were performed between the secondary and primary reconstructive groups with regard to the incidence of postoperative complications. Results All transferred flaps survived completely. We performed a small postoperative modification procedure in four cases. Minor complications not requiring surgical correction occurred in 2 of 20 patients. Additional operations were required owing to major postoperative complications in 2 of 20 patients. No significant associations were identified between the secondary and primary reconstructive groups with regard to postoperative complications. Conclusion The outcomes of the present report suggest that secondary reconstructive surgery is a relatively safe procedure. The decision to perform adaptation operations depends on various factors after sufficient discussion with patients.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84893826174&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84893826174&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/micr.22157

DO - 10.1002/micr.22157

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 122

EP - 128

JO - Microsurgery

JF - Microsurgery

SN - 0738-1085

IS - 2

ER -