Relationship between static ocular counterroll and bielschowsky head tilt phenomenon

Ichiro Hamasaki, Satoshi Hasebe, Takashi Furuse, Hiroshi Ohtsuki

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE. This study was conducted to assess how hyperdeviation of a paretic eye during ipsilesional head tilt-the Bielschowsky head tilt phenomenon (BHP)-can be explained by decreased compensatory ocular counterrolling (OCR) due to the depressed torque of the paretic superior oblique (SO) muscle. METHODS. Thirty-three patients with clinically diagnosed SO palsy and 11 control subjects were studied. With a headmounted video camera, static ocular counterrolling (s-OCR) was determined by measuring the inclination of a line connecting the two centroids of the characteristic iris pattern and corneal reflex. The BHP was measured with the alternate prism and cover test. RESULTS. The mean (SD) amplitude of s-OCR in paretic eyes based on the fit of the regression sine curve against the ipsilesional head tilt angle was significantly decreased compared with that for contralesional head tilt, 6.3 (3.5)° for ipsilesional and 11.3 (3.9)° for contralesional (P <0.001), and was significantly smaller than that in normal subjects: 10.9 (2.6)° (P <0.001). No significant linear relation was noted between hyperdeviation on ipsilesional head tilt and the amplitude of s-OCR in paretic eyes (r 2 = 0.04; P = 0.29). However, the differences between the hyperdeviation with ipsilesional 30° head tilt and with head-upright position correlated significantly with the amplitudes of s-OCR in paretic eyes (r 2 = 0.19, P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS. The absolute value of the hypertropia on ipsilesional head tilt in clinically diagnosed SO palsy does not directly assess the function of the SO muscle. The difference in hypertropia between ipsilesional head tilt and the upright position, however, may be a better indicator of SO function.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)201-206
Number of pages6
JournalInvestigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science
Volume51
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2010

Fingerprint

Head
Oculomotor Muscles
Strabismus
Paralysis
Blinking
Torque
Iris

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology
  • Sensory Systems
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience

Cite this

Relationship between static ocular counterroll and bielschowsky head tilt phenomenon. / Hamasaki, Ichiro; Hasebe, Satoshi; Furuse, Takashi; Ohtsuki, Hiroshi.

In: Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Vol. 51, No. 1, 01.2010, p. 201-206.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hamasaki, Ichiro ; Hasebe, Satoshi ; Furuse, Takashi ; Ohtsuki, Hiroshi. / Relationship between static ocular counterroll and bielschowsky head tilt phenomenon. In: Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 2010 ; Vol. 51, No. 1. pp. 201-206.
@article{35ae39eb932e4c74a03bfd2f7cbacae1,
title = "Relationship between static ocular counterroll and bielschowsky head tilt phenomenon",
abstract = "PURPOSE. This study was conducted to assess how hyperdeviation of a paretic eye during ipsilesional head tilt-the Bielschowsky head tilt phenomenon (BHP)-can be explained by decreased compensatory ocular counterrolling (OCR) due to the depressed torque of the paretic superior oblique (SO) muscle. METHODS. Thirty-three patients with clinically diagnosed SO palsy and 11 control subjects were studied. With a headmounted video camera, static ocular counterrolling (s-OCR) was determined by measuring the inclination of a line connecting the two centroids of the characteristic iris pattern and corneal reflex. The BHP was measured with the alternate prism and cover test. RESULTS. The mean (SD) amplitude of s-OCR in paretic eyes based on the fit of the regression sine curve against the ipsilesional head tilt angle was significantly decreased compared with that for contralesional head tilt, 6.3 (3.5)° for ipsilesional and 11.3 (3.9)° for contralesional (P <0.001), and was significantly smaller than that in normal subjects: 10.9 (2.6)° (P <0.001). No significant linear relation was noted between hyperdeviation on ipsilesional head tilt and the amplitude of s-OCR in paretic eyes (r 2 = 0.04; P = 0.29). However, the differences between the hyperdeviation with ipsilesional 30° head tilt and with head-upright position correlated significantly with the amplitudes of s-OCR in paretic eyes (r 2 = 0.19, P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS. The absolute value of the hypertropia on ipsilesional head tilt in clinically diagnosed SO palsy does not directly assess the function of the SO muscle. The difference in hypertropia between ipsilesional head tilt and the upright position, however, may be a better indicator of SO function.",
author = "Ichiro Hamasaki and Satoshi Hasebe and Takashi Furuse and Hiroshi Ohtsuki",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1167/iovs.08-3035",
language = "English",
volume = "51",
pages = "201--206",
journal = "Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science",
issn = "0146-0404",
publisher = "Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Relationship between static ocular counterroll and bielschowsky head tilt phenomenon

AU - Hamasaki, Ichiro

AU - Hasebe, Satoshi

AU - Furuse, Takashi

AU - Ohtsuki, Hiroshi

PY - 2010/1

Y1 - 2010/1

N2 - PURPOSE. This study was conducted to assess how hyperdeviation of a paretic eye during ipsilesional head tilt-the Bielschowsky head tilt phenomenon (BHP)-can be explained by decreased compensatory ocular counterrolling (OCR) due to the depressed torque of the paretic superior oblique (SO) muscle. METHODS. Thirty-three patients with clinically diagnosed SO palsy and 11 control subjects were studied. With a headmounted video camera, static ocular counterrolling (s-OCR) was determined by measuring the inclination of a line connecting the two centroids of the characteristic iris pattern and corneal reflex. The BHP was measured with the alternate prism and cover test. RESULTS. The mean (SD) amplitude of s-OCR in paretic eyes based on the fit of the regression sine curve against the ipsilesional head tilt angle was significantly decreased compared with that for contralesional head tilt, 6.3 (3.5)° for ipsilesional and 11.3 (3.9)° for contralesional (P <0.001), and was significantly smaller than that in normal subjects: 10.9 (2.6)° (P <0.001). No significant linear relation was noted between hyperdeviation on ipsilesional head tilt and the amplitude of s-OCR in paretic eyes (r 2 = 0.04; P = 0.29). However, the differences between the hyperdeviation with ipsilesional 30° head tilt and with head-upright position correlated significantly with the amplitudes of s-OCR in paretic eyes (r 2 = 0.19, P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS. The absolute value of the hypertropia on ipsilesional head tilt in clinically diagnosed SO palsy does not directly assess the function of the SO muscle. The difference in hypertropia between ipsilesional head tilt and the upright position, however, may be a better indicator of SO function.

AB - PURPOSE. This study was conducted to assess how hyperdeviation of a paretic eye during ipsilesional head tilt-the Bielschowsky head tilt phenomenon (BHP)-can be explained by decreased compensatory ocular counterrolling (OCR) due to the depressed torque of the paretic superior oblique (SO) muscle. METHODS. Thirty-three patients with clinically diagnosed SO palsy and 11 control subjects were studied. With a headmounted video camera, static ocular counterrolling (s-OCR) was determined by measuring the inclination of a line connecting the two centroids of the characteristic iris pattern and corneal reflex. The BHP was measured with the alternate prism and cover test. RESULTS. The mean (SD) amplitude of s-OCR in paretic eyes based on the fit of the regression sine curve against the ipsilesional head tilt angle was significantly decreased compared with that for contralesional head tilt, 6.3 (3.5)° for ipsilesional and 11.3 (3.9)° for contralesional (P <0.001), and was significantly smaller than that in normal subjects: 10.9 (2.6)° (P <0.001). No significant linear relation was noted between hyperdeviation on ipsilesional head tilt and the amplitude of s-OCR in paretic eyes (r 2 = 0.04; P = 0.29). However, the differences between the hyperdeviation with ipsilesional 30° head tilt and with head-upright position correlated significantly with the amplitudes of s-OCR in paretic eyes (r 2 = 0.19, P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS. The absolute value of the hypertropia on ipsilesional head tilt in clinically diagnosed SO palsy does not directly assess the function of the SO muscle. The difference in hypertropia between ipsilesional head tilt and the upright position, however, may be a better indicator of SO function.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=75749145919&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=75749145919&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1167/iovs.08-3035

DO - 10.1167/iovs.08-3035

M3 - Article

C2 - 19661233

AN - SCOPUS:75749145919

VL - 51

SP - 201

EP - 206

JO - Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

JF - Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

SN - 0146-0404

IS - 1

ER -