Quantitative evaluation of cortical bone thickness with computed tomographic scanning for orthodontic implants

Toru Deguchi, Miho Nasu, Kaoru Murakami, Toshinori Yabuuchi, Hiroshi Kamioka, Teruko Takano-Yamamoto

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

180 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to quantitatively evaluate cortical bone thickness in various locations in the maxilla and the mandible. In addition, the distances from intercortical bone surface to root surface, and distances between the roots of premolars and molars were also measured to determine the acceptable length and diameter of the miniscrew for anchorage during orthodontic treatment. Methods: Three-dimensional computed tomographic images were reconstructed for 10 patients. Cortical bone thicknesses were measured in the buccal and lingual regions mesial and distal to the first molar, distal to the second molar, and in the premaxillary region at 2 different levels. Differences in cortical bone thickness at 3 angles (30°, 45°, and 90°) were also assessed. Distances of the intercortical bone surface to the root surface and the root proximity were also measured at the above areas. Results: Significantly less cortical bone thickness was observed at the buccal region distal to the second molar compared with other areas in the maxilla. Significantly more cortical bone was observed on the lingual side of the second molar compared with the buccal side. In the mandible, mesial and distal to the second molar, significantly more cortical bone was observed compared with the maxilla. Furthermore, significantly more cortical bone was observed at the anterior nasal spine level than at Point A in the premaxillary region. Cortical bone thickness resulted in approximately 1.5 times as much at 30° compared with 90° Significantly more distance from the intercortical bone surface to the root surface was observed at the lingual region than at the buccal region mesial to the first molar. At the distal of the first mandibular molar, significantly more distance was observed compared to that in the mesial, and also compared with both distal and mesial in the maxillary first molar. There was significantly more distance in root proximity in the mesial area than in distal area at the first molar, and significantly more distance was observed at the occlusal level than at the apical level. Conclusions: These data show that the safest location for placing miniscrews might be mesial or distal to the first molar, and an acceptable size of the miniscrew is less than approximately 1.5 mm in diameter and approximately 6 to 8 mm in length.

Original languageEnglish
JournalAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Volume129
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2006

Fingerprint

Orthodontics
Cheek
Maxilla
Tongue
Mandible
Bone and Bones
Cortical Bone
Bicuspid
Nose
Spine

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)
  • Surgery

Cite this

Quantitative evaluation of cortical bone thickness with computed tomographic scanning for orthodontic implants. / Deguchi, Toru; Nasu, Miho; Murakami, Kaoru; Yabuuchi, Toshinori; Kamioka, Hiroshi; Takano-Yamamoto, Teruko.

In: American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Vol. 129, No. 6, 06.2006.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Deguchi, Toru ; Nasu, Miho ; Murakami, Kaoru ; Yabuuchi, Toshinori ; Kamioka, Hiroshi ; Takano-Yamamoto, Teruko. / Quantitative evaluation of cortical bone thickness with computed tomographic scanning for orthodontic implants. In: American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2006 ; Vol. 129, No. 6.
@article{c2f8bab16f00490f84fd27a23be35a5a,
title = "Quantitative evaluation of cortical bone thickness with computed tomographic scanning for orthodontic implants",
abstract = "Introduction: The purpose of this study was to quantitatively evaluate cortical bone thickness in various locations in the maxilla and the mandible. In addition, the distances from intercortical bone surface to root surface, and distances between the roots of premolars and molars were also measured to determine the acceptable length and diameter of the miniscrew for anchorage during orthodontic treatment. Methods: Three-dimensional computed tomographic images were reconstructed for 10 patients. Cortical bone thicknesses were measured in the buccal and lingual regions mesial and distal to the first molar, distal to the second molar, and in the premaxillary region at 2 different levels. Differences in cortical bone thickness at 3 angles (30°, 45°, and 90°) were also assessed. Distances of the intercortical bone surface to the root surface and the root proximity were also measured at the above areas. Results: Significantly less cortical bone thickness was observed at the buccal region distal to the second molar compared with other areas in the maxilla. Significantly more cortical bone was observed on the lingual side of the second molar compared with the buccal side. In the mandible, mesial and distal to the second molar, significantly more cortical bone was observed compared with the maxilla. Furthermore, significantly more cortical bone was observed at the anterior nasal spine level than at Point A in the premaxillary region. Cortical bone thickness resulted in approximately 1.5 times as much at 30° compared with 90° Significantly more distance from the intercortical bone surface to the root surface was observed at the lingual region than at the buccal region mesial to the first molar. At the distal of the first mandibular molar, significantly more distance was observed compared to that in the mesial, and also compared with both distal and mesial in the maxillary first molar. There was significantly more distance in root proximity in the mesial area than in distal area at the first molar, and significantly more distance was observed at the occlusal level than at the apical level. Conclusions: These data show that the safest location for placing miniscrews might be mesial or distal to the first molar, and an acceptable size of the miniscrew is less than approximately 1.5 mm in diameter and approximately 6 to 8 mm in length.",
author = "Toru Deguchi and Miho Nasu and Kaoru Murakami and Toshinori Yabuuchi and Hiroshi Kamioka and Teruko Takano-Yamamoto",
year = "2006",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.02.026",
language = "English",
volume = "129",
journal = "American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics",
issn = "0889-5406",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quantitative evaluation of cortical bone thickness with computed tomographic scanning for orthodontic implants

AU - Deguchi, Toru

AU - Nasu, Miho

AU - Murakami, Kaoru

AU - Yabuuchi, Toshinori

AU - Kamioka, Hiroshi

AU - Takano-Yamamoto, Teruko

PY - 2006/6

Y1 - 2006/6

N2 - Introduction: The purpose of this study was to quantitatively evaluate cortical bone thickness in various locations in the maxilla and the mandible. In addition, the distances from intercortical bone surface to root surface, and distances between the roots of premolars and molars were also measured to determine the acceptable length and diameter of the miniscrew for anchorage during orthodontic treatment. Methods: Three-dimensional computed tomographic images were reconstructed for 10 patients. Cortical bone thicknesses were measured in the buccal and lingual regions mesial and distal to the first molar, distal to the second molar, and in the premaxillary region at 2 different levels. Differences in cortical bone thickness at 3 angles (30°, 45°, and 90°) were also assessed. Distances of the intercortical bone surface to the root surface and the root proximity were also measured at the above areas. Results: Significantly less cortical bone thickness was observed at the buccal region distal to the second molar compared with other areas in the maxilla. Significantly more cortical bone was observed on the lingual side of the second molar compared with the buccal side. In the mandible, mesial and distal to the second molar, significantly more cortical bone was observed compared with the maxilla. Furthermore, significantly more cortical bone was observed at the anterior nasal spine level than at Point A in the premaxillary region. Cortical bone thickness resulted in approximately 1.5 times as much at 30° compared with 90° Significantly more distance from the intercortical bone surface to the root surface was observed at the lingual region than at the buccal region mesial to the first molar. At the distal of the first mandibular molar, significantly more distance was observed compared to that in the mesial, and also compared with both distal and mesial in the maxillary first molar. There was significantly more distance in root proximity in the mesial area than in distal area at the first molar, and significantly more distance was observed at the occlusal level than at the apical level. Conclusions: These data show that the safest location for placing miniscrews might be mesial or distal to the first molar, and an acceptable size of the miniscrew is less than approximately 1.5 mm in diameter and approximately 6 to 8 mm in length.

AB - Introduction: The purpose of this study was to quantitatively evaluate cortical bone thickness in various locations in the maxilla and the mandible. In addition, the distances from intercortical bone surface to root surface, and distances between the roots of premolars and molars were also measured to determine the acceptable length and diameter of the miniscrew for anchorage during orthodontic treatment. Methods: Three-dimensional computed tomographic images were reconstructed for 10 patients. Cortical bone thicknesses were measured in the buccal and lingual regions mesial and distal to the first molar, distal to the second molar, and in the premaxillary region at 2 different levels. Differences in cortical bone thickness at 3 angles (30°, 45°, and 90°) were also assessed. Distances of the intercortical bone surface to the root surface and the root proximity were also measured at the above areas. Results: Significantly less cortical bone thickness was observed at the buccal region distal to the second molar compared with other areas in the maxilla. Significantly more cortical bone was observed on the lingual side of the second molar compared with the buccal side. In the mandible, mesial and distal to the second molar, significantly more cortical bone was observed compared with the maxilla. Furthermore, significantly more cortical bone was observed at the anterior nasal spine level than at Point A in the premaxillary region. Cortical bone thickness resulted in approximately 1.5 times as much at 30° compared with 90° Significantly more distance from the intercortical bone surface to the root surface was observed at the lingual region than at the buccal region mesial to the first molar. At the distal of the first mandibular molar, significantly more distance was observed compared to that in the mesial, and also compared with both distal and mesial in the maxillary first molar. There was significantly more distance in root proximity in the mesial area than in distal area at the first molar, and significantly more distance was observed at the occlusal level than at the apical level. Conclusions: These data show that the safest location for placing miniscrews might be mesial or distal to the first molar, and an acceptable size of the miniscrew is less than approximately 1.5 mm in diameter and approximately 6 to 8 mm in length.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33744930120&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33744930120&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.02.026

DO - 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.02.026

M3 - Article

C2 - 16769488

AN - SCOPUS:33744930120

VL - 129

JO - American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

JF - American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

SN - 0889-5406

IS - 6

ER -