TY - JOUR
T1 - Quality of life assessment in patients with implant-supported and resin-bonded fixed prosthesis for bounded edentulous spaces
AU - Sonoyama, Wataru
AU - Kuboki, Takuo
AU - Okamoto, Soichiro
AU - Suzuki, Hidenori
AU - Arakawa, Hikaru
AU - Kanyama, Manabu
AU - Yatani, Hirofumi
AU - Yamashita, Atsushi
PY - 2002/8
Y1 - 2002/8
N2 - Objectives: Dental implants have become increasingly popular in the prosthetic rehabilitation of patients with bounded edentulous spaces. Oral condition-related quality of life (QOL) levels have rarely been assessed in these patients. Material and methods: Two groups of subjects with bounded edentulous spaces were studied: an implant-supported fixed prosthesis group (11 patients) and a resin-bonded fixed prosthesis group (33 patients). The two groups were well matched in terms of sex, age, missing units and location of missing units. The patients were requested to answer a self-administered QOL questionnaire with two major subscales - oral condition- and general condition-related QOL scores. The test-retest reliability of each question was pre-examined and found acceptable (mean Spearman rank correlation coefficient was 0.55 ± 0.16). Mean QOL score differences between the two groups were analyzed by the Mann-Whitney U-test. Results: Mean oral condition-related QOL scores of the implant-supported and resin-bonded fixed prosthesis groups were 87.8 ± 9.5 and 87.1 ± 12.3% (P = 0.85), and mean general condition-related QOL scores were 73.8 ± 14.8 and 71.6 ± 15.2% (P = 0.95), respectively. No significant QOL differences between the two groups were observed in the two subscales. Conclusion: In patients with bounded edentulous spaces, multidimensional QOL levels of patients with an implant-supported fixed prosthesis do not exceed those of patients with a resin-bonded fixed prosthesis in a short follow-up period.
AB - Objectives: Dental implants have become increasingly popular in the prosthetic rehabilitation of patients with bounded edentulous spaces. Oral condition-related quality of life (QOL) levels have rarely been assessed in these patients. Material and methods: Two groups of subjects with bounded edentulous spaces were studied: an implant-supported fixed prosthesis group (11 patients) and a resin-bonded fixed prosthesis group (33 patients). The two groups were well matched in terms of sex, age, missing units and location of missing units. The patients were requested to answer a self-administered QOL questionnaire with two major subscales - oral condition- and general condition-related QOL scores. The test-retest reliability of each question was pre-examined and found acceptable (mean Spearman rank correlation coefficient was 0.55 ± 0.16). Mean QOL score differences between the two groups were analyzed by the Mann-Whitney U-test. Results: Mean oral condition-related QOL scores of the implant-supported and resin-bonded fixed prosthesis groups were 87.8 ± 9.5 and 87.1 ± 12.3% (P = 0.85), and mean general condition-related QOL scores were 73.8 ± 14.8 and 71.6 ± 15.2% (P = 0.95), respectively. No significant QOL differences between the two groups were observed in the two subscales. Conclusion: In patients with bounded edentulous spaces, multidimensional QOL levels of patients with an implant-supported fixed prosthesis do not exceed those of patients with a resin-bonded fixed prosthesis in a short follow-up period.
KW - Bounded edentulous space
KW - Implant-supported fixed prosthesis
KW - Quality of life
KW - Self-administered questionnaire
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036691724&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036691724&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130403.x
DO - 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130403.x
M3 - Article
C2 - 12175372
AN - SCOPUS:0036691724
SN - 0905-7161
VL - 13
SP - 359
EP - 364
JO - Clinical Oral Implants Research
JF - Clinical Oral Implants Research
IS - 4
ER -