Primary health care in Japan and the United States

Toshihide Tsuda, Hideyasu Aoyama, Jack Froom

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Japan has universal health insurance and its total health expenditure as a percentage of the gross domestic product is almost 50% less than that of the United States where 15% of persons under age 65 are uninsured. The health of the Japanese population as judged by neonatal, postnatal, and total infant mortality, percent of infants born with birth weights below 2500g, and life expectancy at birth and ages 20 and 65 is superior to the health of Americans. Primary care, however, as an academic discipline and primary care training programs are absent in Japan. Physician training, incongruent with need, combined with government controlled low professional medical fees contribute to an extraordinarily high annual ambulatory patient contact rate (14 compared with 2.8 for Americans) and excessive use of diagnostic testing. Although primary care training is better developed in the U.S.A., interest in receiving such training among medical school graduates is declining. Several factors that contribute to quality of care are examined. Comparisons between countries, however, must be viewed with caution because of the multitude of demographic, genetic, historical, economic and cultural variables that influence how health care is delivered and received. Both countries face major challenges. The projected rapid increase in the relative ratio of the elderly to total population in Japan will severely strain its ability to contain health care costs. Interest in primary care training in Japan dates back to 1978 but its implementation has been largely unsuccessful. The challenges in the U.S.A. are far more formidable. Attainment of universal health insurance and provision of adequate health care to the exponentially increasing number of acquired immunodeficiency cases, while at the same time controlling escalating health care costs may require major restructing of the health care system. Although solutions to these problems are country specific, each country can benefit from the other's experience; Japan by examining the relatively recent development of primary care training in the U.S.A., and the U.S.A. by a careful look at Japan's mechanisms for achieving universal health insurance. Differences in morbidity and mortality patterns between the populations provide a unique opportunity for binational research to explain them.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)489-495
Number of pages7
JournalSocial Science and Medicine
Volume38
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1994

Fingerprint

primary health care
Primary Health Care
Japan
health care
health insurance
Health Insurance
Delivery of Health Care
Health Care Costs
Medical Fees
health
health expenditure
Population
Gross Domestic Product
infant mortality
underage
Quality of Health Care
life expectancy
school graduate
gross domestic product
Health

Keywords

  • health statistics
  • national health care in Japan
  • national health care in the U.S.A.
  • primary care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Development
  • Health(social science)

Cite this

Primary health care in Japan and the United States. / Tsuda, Toshihide; Aoyama, Hideyasu; Froom, Jack.

In: Social Science and Medicine, Vol. 38, No. 4, 1994, p. 489-495.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tsuda, Toshihide ; Aoyama, Hideyasu ; Froom, Jack. / Primary health care in Japan and the United States. In: Social Science and Medicine. 1994 ; Vol. 38, No. 4. pp. 489-495.
@article{2d9b762a2f2447ce9e1e5de34d30c1ec,
title = "Primary health care in Japan and the United States",
abstract = "Japan has universal health insurance and its total health expenditure as a percentage of the gross domestic product is almost 50{\%} less than that of the United States where 15{\%} of persons under age 65 are uninsured. The health of the Japanese population as judged by neonatal, postnatal, and total infant mortality, percent of infants born with birth weights below 2500g, and life expectancy at birth and ages 20 and 65 is superior to the health of Americans. Primary care, however, as an academic discipline and primary care training programs are absent in Japan. Physician training, incongruent with need, combined with government controlled low professional medical fees contribute to an extraordinarily high annual ambulatory patient contact rate (14 compared with 2.8 for Americans) and excessive use of diagnostic testing. Although primary care training is better developed in the U.S.A., interest in receiving such training among medical school graduates is declining. Several factors that contribute to quality of care are examined. Comparisons between countries, however, must be viewed with caution because of the multitude of demographic, genetic, historical, economic and cultural variables that influence how health care is delivered and received. Both countries face major challenges. The projected rapid increase in the relative ratio of the elderly to total population in Japan will severely strain its ability to contain health care costs. Interest in primary care training in Japan dates back to 1978 but its implementation has been largely unsuccessful. The challenges in the U.S.A. are far more formidable. Attainment of universal health insurance and provision of adequate health care to the exponentially increasing number of acquired immunodeficiency cases, while at the same time controlling escalating health care costs may require major restructing of the health care system. Although solutions to these problems are country specific, each country can benefit from the other's experience; Japan by examining the relatively recent development of primary care training in the U.S.A., and the U.S.A. by a careful look at Japan's mechanisms for achieving universal health insurance. Differences in morbidity and mortality patterns between the populations provide a unique opportunity for binational research to explain them.",
keywords = "health statistics, national health care in Japan, national health care in the U.S.A., primary care",
author = "Toshihide Tsuda and Hideyasu Aoyama and Jack Froom",
year = "1994",
doi = "10.1016/0277-9536(94)90245-3",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "489--495",
journal = "Social Science and Medicine",
issn = "0277-9536",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Primary health care in Japan and the United States

AU - Tsuda, Toshihide

AU - Aoyama, Hideyasu

AU - Froom, Jack

PY - 1994

Y1 - 1994

N2 - Japan has universal health insurance and its total health expenditure as a percentage of the gross domestic product is almost 50% less than that of the United States where 15% of persons under age 65 are uninsured. The health of the Japanese population as judged by neonatal, postnatal, and total infant mortality, percent of infants born with birth weights below 2500g, and life expectancy at birth and ages 20 and 65 is superior to the health of Americans. Primary care, however, as an academic discipline and primary care training programs are absent in Japan. Physician training, incongruent with need, combined with government controlled low professional medical fees contribute to an extraordinarily high annual ambulatory patient contact rate (14 compared with 2.8 for Americans) and excessive use of diagnostic testing. Although primary care training is better developed in the U.S.A., interest in receiving such training among medical school graduates is declining. Several factors that contribute to quality of care are examined. Comparisons between countries, however, must be viewed with caution because of the multitude of demographic, genetic, historical, economic and cultural variables that influence how health care is delivered and received. Both countries face major challenges. The projected rapid increase in the relative ratio of the elderly to total population in Japan will severely strain its ability to contain health care costs. Interest in primary care training in Japan dates back to 1978 but its implementation has been largely unsuccessful. The challenges in the U.S.A. are far more formidable. Attainment of universal health insurance and provision of adequate health care to the exponentially increasing number of acquired immunodeficiency cases, while at the same time controlling escalating health care costs may require major restructing of the health care system. Although solutions to these problems are country specific, each country can benefit from the other's experience; Japan by examining the relatively recent development of primary care training in the U.S.A., and the U.S.A. by a careful look at Japan's mechanisms for achieving universal health insurance. Differences in morbidity and mortality patterns between the populations provide a unique opportunity for binational research to explain them.

AB - Japan has universal health insurance and its total health expenditure as a percentage of the gross domestic product is almost 50% less than that of the United States where 15% of persons under age 65 are uninsured. The health of the Japanese population as judged by neonatal, postnatal, and total infant mortality, percent of infants born with birth weights below 2500g, and life expectancy at birth and ages 20 and 65 is superior to the health of Americans. Primary care, however, as an academic discipline and primary care training programs are absent in Japan. Physician training, incongruent with need, combined with government controlled low professional medical fees contribute to an extraordinarily high annual ambulatory patient contact rate (14 compared with 2.8 for Americans) and excessive use of diagnostic testing. Although primary care training is better developed in the U.S.A., interest in receiving such training among medical school graduates is declining. Several factors that contribute to quality of care are examined. Comparisons between countries, however, must be viewed with caution because of the multitude of demographic, genetic, historical, economic and cultural variables that influence how health care is delivered and received. Both countries face major challenges. The projected rapid increase in the relative ratio of the elderly to total population in Japan will severely strain its ability to contain health care costs. Interest in primary care training in Japan dates back to 1978 but its implementation has been largely unsuccessful. The challenges in the U.S.A. are far more formidable. Attainment of universal health insurance and provision of adequate health care to the exponentially increasing number of acquired immunodeficiency cases, while at the same time controlling escalating health care costs may require major restructing of the health care system. Although solutions to these problems are country specific, each country can benefit from the other's experience; Japan by examining the relatively recent development of primary care training in the U.S.A., and the U.S.A. by a careful look at Japan's mechanisms for achieving universal health insurance. Differences in morbidity and mortality patterns between the populations provide a unique opportunity for binational research to explain them.

KW - health statistics

KW - national health care in Japan

KW - national health care in the U.S.A.

KW - primary care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028140442&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028140442&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0277-9536(94)90245-3

DO - 10.1016/0277-9536(94)90245-3

M3 - Article

C2 - 8184312

AN - SCOPUS:0028140442

VL - 38

SP - 489

EP - 495

JO - Social Science and Medicine

JF - Social Science and Medicine

SN - 0277-9536

IS - 4

ER -