Prevention of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and hepatitis B. Part IV: The effect of impression material on glutaraldehyde solution

Hidenobu Tomita, Shougo Minagi, Yasumasa Akagawa, Hiromichi Tsuru

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Immersion of dental impressions in 2% glutaraldehyde has been shown to be an effective disinfection procedure for viral contamination. This study compared the effect of immersing impression materials on the concentrations of glutaraldehyde. Contamination with saliva slightly affected the concentration of glutaraldehyde. Irreversible hydrocolloid impression material markedly decreased the concentration of glutaraldehyde, whereas the immersion of silicone rubber impression material only slightly affected the concentration of glutaraldehyde. Attention should be paid to the concentration of glutaraldehyde solution when irreversible hydrocolloid impression material is immersed in the disinfectant.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)573-577
Number of pages5
JournalThe Journal of prosthetic dentistry
Volume64
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1990
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Glutaral
Hepatitis B
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome
Colloids
Immersion
Silicone Elastomers
Disinfectants
Disinfection
Saliva
Tooth

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oral Surgery
  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Prevention of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and hepatitis B. Part IV : The effect of impression material on glutaraldehyde solution. / Tomita, Hidenobu; Minagi, Shougo; Akagawa, Yasumasa; Tsuru, Hiromichi.

In: The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, Vol. 64, No. 5, 1990, p. 573-577.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{fffaf124307043b283853007bc581a06,
title = "Prevention of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and hepatitis B. Part IV: The effect of impression material on glutaraldehyde solution",
abstract = "Immersion of dental impressions in 2{\%} glutaraldehyde has been shown to be an effective disinfection procedure for viral contamination. This study compared the effect of immersing impression materials on the concentrations of glutaraldehyde. Contamination with saliva slightly affected the concentration of glutaraldehyde. Irreversible hydrocolloid impression material markedly decreased the concentration of glutaraldehyde, whereas the immersion of silicone rubber impression material only slightly affected the concentration of glutaraldehyde. Attention should be paid to the concentration of glutaraldehyde solution when irreversible hydrocolloid impression material is immersed in the disinfectant.",
author = "Hidenobu Tomita and Shougo Minagi and Yasumasa Akagawa and Hiromichi Tsuru",
year = "1990",
doi = "10.1016/0022-3913(90)90131-U",
language = "English",
volume = "64",
pages = "573--577",
journal = "Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry",
issn = "0022-3913",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prevention of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and hepatitis B. Part IV

T2 - The effect of impression material on glutaraldehyde solution

AU - Tomita, Hidenobu

AU - Minagi, Shougo

AU - Akagawa, Yasumasa

AU - Tsuru, Hiromichi

PY - 1990

Y1 - 1990

N2 - Immersion of dental impressions in 2% glutaraldehyde has been shown to be an effective disinfection procedure for viral contamination. This study compared the effect of immersing impression materials on the concentrations of glutaraldehyde. Contamination with saliva slightly affected the concentration of glutaraldehyde. Irreversible hydrocolloid impression material markedly decreased the concentration of glutaraldehyde, whereas the immersion of silicone rubber impression material only slightly affected the concentration of glutaraldehyde. Attention should be paid to the concentration of glutaraldehyde solution when irreversible hydrocolloid impression material is immersed in the disinfectant.

AB - Immersion of dental impressions in 2% glutaraldehyde has been shown to be an effective disinfection procedure for viral contamination. This study compared the effect of immersing impression materials on the concentrations of glutaraldehyde. Contamination with saliva slightly affected the concentration of glutaraldehyde. Irreversible hydrocolloid impression material markedly decreased the concentration of glutaraldehyde, whereas the immersion of silicone rubber impression material only slightly affected the concentration of glutaraldehyde. Attention should be paid to the concentration of glutaraldehyde solution when irreversible hydrocolloid impression material is immersed in the disinfectant.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025515338&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025515338&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0022-3913(90)90131-U

DO - 10.1016/0022-3913(90)90131-U

M3 - Article

C2 - 2128640

AN - SCOPUS:0025515338

VL - 64

SP - 573

EP - 577

JO - Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

JF - Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

SN - 0022-3913

IS - 5

ER -