TY - JOUR
T1 - Phrenic nerve injury after radiofrequency ablation of lung tumors
T2 - Retrospective evaluation of the incidence and risk factors
AU - Matsui, Yusuke
AU - Hiraki, Takao
AU - Gobara, Hideo
AU - Uka, Mayu
AU - Masaoka, Yoshihisa
AU - Tada, Akihiro
AU - Toyooka, Shinichi
AU - Mitsuhashi, Toshiharu
AU - Mimura, Hidefumi
AU - Kanazawa, Susumu
PY - 2012/6
Y1 - 2012/6
N2 - Purpose: To retrospectively investigate the incidence of and risk factors for phrenic nerve injury after radiofrequency (RF) ablation of lung tumors. Materials and Methods: The study included 814 RF ablation procedures of lung tumors. To evaluate the development of phrenic nerve injury, chest radiographs obtained before and after the procedure were examined. Phrenic nerve injury was assumed to have developed if the diaphragmatic level was elevated after the procedure. To identify risk factors for phrenic nerve injury, multiple variables were compared between cases of phrenic nerve injury and randomly selected controls by using univariate analyses. Multivariate analysis was then performed to identify independent risk factors. Results: Evaluation of phrenic nerve injury from chest radiographs was possible after 786 procedures. Evidence of phrenic nerve injury developed after 10 cases (1.3%). Univariate analysis revealed that larger tumor size (< 20 mm; P =.014), proximity of the phrenic nerve to the tumor (< 10 mm; P <.001), the use of larger electrodes (array diameter or noninsulated tip length < 3 cm; P =.001), and higher maximum power applied during ablation (< 100 W; P <.001) were significantly associated with the development of phrenic nerve injury. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the proximity of the phrenic nerve to the tumor (< 10 mm; P <.001) was a significant independent risk factor. Conclusions: The incidence of phrenic nerve injury after RF ablation was 1.3%. The proximity of the phrenic nerve to the tumor was an independent risk factor for phrenic nerve injury.
AB - Purpose: To retrospectively investigate the incidence of and risk factors for phrenic nerve injury after radiofrequency (RF) ablation of lung tumors. Materials and Methods: The study included 814 RF ablation procedures of lung tumors. To evaluate the development of phrenic nerve injury, chest radiographs obtained before and after the procedure were examined. Phrenic nerve injury was assumed to have developed if the diaphragmatic level was elevated after the procedure. To identify risk factors for phrenic nerve injury, multiple variables were compared between cases of phrenic nerve injury and randomly selected controls by using univariate analyses. Multivariate analysis was then performed to identify independent risk factors. Results: Evaluation of phrenic nerve injury from chest radiographs was possible after 786 procedures. Evidence of phrenic nerve injury developed after 10 cases (1.3%). Univariate analysis revealed that larger tumor size (< 20 mm; P =.014), proximity of the phrenic nerve to the tumor (< 10 mm; P <.001), the use of larger electrodes (array diameter or noninsulated tip length < 3 cm; P =.001), and higher maximum power applied during ablation (< 100 W; P <.001) were significantly associated with the development of phrenic nerve injury. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the proximity of the phrenic nerve to the tumor (< 10 mm; P <.001) was a significant independent risk factor. Conclusions: The incidence of phrenic nerve injury after RF ablation was 1.3%. The proximity of the phrenic nerve to the tumor was an independent risk factor for phrenic nerve injury.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84861576410&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84861576410&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jvir.2012.02.014
DO - 10.1016/j.jvir.2012.02.014
M3 - Article
C2 - 22513393
AN - SCOPUS:84861576410
SN - 1051-0443
VL - 23
SP - 780
EP - 785
JO - Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
JF - Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
IS - 6
ER -