Peritoneal lavage versus drainage for perforated appendicitis in children

Akira Toki, Kaoru Ogura, Tadashi Horimi, Hirohumi Tokuoka, Takuji Todani, Yasuhiro Watanabe, Sadashige Uemura, Naoto Urushihara, Takuo Noda, Yasuhisa Sato, Yoshiki Morotomi, Kiyoshi Sasaki

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A total of 231 children with acute appendicitis were treated at our hospitals during the 10 years between 1984 and 1993, 53 of whom had a perforated appendix. These 53 patients were randomly assigned to two groups at the time of surgery according to the different procedures performed. Thus, 29 children were managed by appendectomy followed by peritoneal lavage using a large amount of saline, and intravenous antibiotic therapy consisting of aminoglycoside and cephem (lavage group), while the other 24 children were treated by appendectomy with silicon tube drainage and the same systemic antibiotic therapy (drainage group). The mean length of hospitalization, and the mean durations of fever and the need for fasting after laparotomy in the lavage group were significantly less than those in the drainage group: 10.1 versus 18.8 days, 2.8 versus 7.7 days, and 1.8 versus 3.5 days, respectively. The operation wounds healed well in the lavage group due to the fact that there was no drain. Wound infections occurred in two children from the lavage group and six from the drainage group. Intra-abdominal abscesses occurred in two children from the drainage group. Accordingly, peritoneal lavage appears to be superior to intraperitoneal tube drainage for the management of perforated appendicitis in children.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)207-210
Number of pages4
JournalSurgery Today
Volume25
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 1995
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Peritoneal Lavage
Appendicitis
Drainage
Therapeutic Irrigation
Appendectomy
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Abdominal Abscess
Aminoglycosides
Silicon
Wound Infection
Group Psychotherapy
Laparotomy
Fasting
Hospitalization
Fever
Wounds and Injuries

Keywords

  • perforated appendicitis
  • peritoneal drainage
  • peritoneal lavage

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Toki, A., Ogura, K., Horimi, T., Tokuoka, H., Todani, T., Watanabe, Y., ... Sasaki, K. (1995). Peritoneal lavage versus drainage for perforated appendicitis in children. Surgery Today, 25(3), 207-210. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00311528

Peritoneal lavage versus drainage for perforated appendicitis in children. / Toki, Akira; Ogura, Kaoru; Horimi, Tadashi; Tokuoka, Hirohumi; Todani, Takuji; Watanabe, Yasuhiro; Uemura, Sadashige; Urushihara, Naoto; Noda, Takuo; Sato, Yasuhisa; Morotomi, Yoshiki; Sasaki, Kiyoshi.

In: Surgery Today, Vol. 25, No. 3, 03.1995, p. 207-210.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Toki, A, Ogura, K, Horimi, T, Tokuoka, H, Todani, T, Watanabe, Y, Uemura, S, Urushihara, N, Noda, T, Sato, Y, Morotomi, Y & Sasaki, K 1995, 'Peritoneal lavage versus drainage for perforated appendicitis in children', Surgery Today, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 207-210. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00311528
Toki A, Ogura K, Horimi T, Tokuoka H, Todani T, Watanabe Y et al. Peritoneal lavage versus drainage for perforated appendicitis in children. Surgery Today. 1995 Mar;25(3):207-210. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00311528
Toki, Akira ; Ogura, Kaoru ; Horimi, Tadashi ; Tokuoka, Hirohumi ; Todani, Takuji ; Watanabe, Yasuhiro ; Uemura, Sadashige ; Urushihara, Naoto ; Noda, Takuo ; Sato, Yasuhisa ; Morotomi, Yoshiki ; Sasaki, Kiyoshi. / Peritoneal lavage versus drainage for perforated appendicitis in children. In: Surgery Today. 1995 ; Vol. 25, No. 3. pp. 207-210.
@article{10d46dc55aa74ee49982b7c4d6ab1847,
title = "Peritoneal lavage versus drainage for perforated appendicitis in children",
abstract = "A total of 231 children with acute appendicitis were treated at our hospitals during the 10 years between 1984 and 1993, 53 of whom had a perforated appendix. These 53 patients were randomly assigned to two groups at the time of surgery according to the different procedures performed. Thus, 29 children were managed by appendectomy followed by peritoneal lavage using a large amount of saline, and intravenous antibiotic therapy consisting of aminoglycoside and cephem (lavage group), while the other 24 children were treated by appendectomy with silicon tube drainage and the same systemic antibiotic therapy (drainage group). The mean length of hospitalization, and the mean durations of fever and the need for fasting after laparotomy in the lavage group were significantly less than those in the drainage group: 10.1 versus 18.8 days, 2.8 versus 7.7 days, and 1.8 versus 3.5 days, respectively. The operation wounds healed well in the lavage group due to the fact that there was no drain. Wound infections occurred in two children from the lavage group and six from the drainage group. Intra-abdominal abscesses occurred in two children from the drainage group. Accordingly, peritoneal lavage appears to be superior to intraperitoneal tube drainage for the management of perforated appendicitis in children.",
keywords = "perforated appendicitis, peritoneal drainage, peritoneal lavage",
author = "Akira Toki and Kaoru Ogura and Tadashi Horimi and Hirohumi Tokuoka and Takuji Todani and Yasuhiro Watanabe and Sadashige Uemura and Naoto Urushihara and Takuo Noda and Yasuhisa Sato and Yoshiki Morotomi and Kiyoshi Sasaki",
year = "1995",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1007/BF00311528",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "207--210",
journal = "Japanese Journal of Surgery",
issn = "0941-1291",
publisher = "Springer Japan",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Peritoneal lavage versus drainage for perforated appendicitis in children

AU - Toki, Akira

AU - Ogura, Kaoru

AU - Horimi, Tadashi

AU - Tokuoka, Hirohumi

AU - Todani, Takuji

AU - Watanabe, Yasuhiro

AU - Uemura, Sadashige

AU - Urushihara, Naoto

AU - Noda, Takuo

AU - Sato, Yasuhisa

AU - Morotomi, Yoshiki

AU - Sasaki, Kiyoshi

PY - 1995/3

Y1 - 1995/3

N2 - A total of 231 children with acute appendicitis were treated at our hospitals during the 10 years between 1984 and 1993, 53 of whom had a perforated appendix. These 53 patients were randomly assigned to two groups at the time of surgery according to the different procedures performed. Thus, 29 children were managed by appendectomy followed by peritoneal lavage using a large amount of saline, and intravenous antibiotic therapy consisting of aminoglycoside and cephem (lavage group), while the other 24 children were treated by appendectomy with silicon tube drainage and the same systemic antibiotic therapy (drainage group). The mean length of hospitalization, and the mean durations of fever and the need for fasting after laparotomy in the lavage group were significantly less than those in the drainage group: 10.1 versus 18.8 days, 2.8 versus 7.7 days, and 1.8 versus 3.5 days, respectively. The operation wounds healed well in the lavage group due to the fact that there was no drain. Wound infections occurred in two children from the lavage group and six from the drainage group. Intra-abdominal abscesses occurred in two children from the drainage group. Accordingly, peritoneal lavage appears to be superior to intraperitoneal tube drainage for the management of perforated appendicitis in children.

AB - A total of 231 children with acute appendicitis were treated at our hospitals during the 10 years between 1984 and 1993, 53 of whom had a perforated appendix. These 53 patients were randomly assigned to two groups at the time of surgery according to the different procedures performed. Thus, 29 children were managed by appendectomy followed by peritoneal lavage using a large amount of saline, and intravenous antibiotic therapy consisting of aminoglycoside and cephem (lavage group), while the other 24 children were treated by appendectomy with silicon tube drainage and the same systemic antibiotic therapy (drainage group). The mean length of hospitalization, and the mean durations of fever and the need for fasting after laparotomy in the lavage group were significantly less than those in the drainage group: 10.1 versus 18.8 days, 2.8 versus 7.7 days, and 1.8 versus 3.5 days, respectively. The operation wounds healed well in the lavage group due to the fact that there was no drain. Wound infections occurred in two children from the lavage group and six from the drainage group. Intra-abdominal abscesses occurred in two children from the drainage group. Accordingly, peritoneal lavage appears to be superior to intraperitoneal tube drainage for the management of perforated appendicitis in children.

KW - perforated appendicitis

KW - peritoneal drainage

KW - peritoneal lavage

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029034522&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029034522&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/BF00311528

DO - 10.1007/BF00311528

M3 - Article

C2 - 7640447

AN - SCOPUS:0029034522

VL - 25

SP - 207

EP - 210

JO - Japanese Journal of Surgery

JF - Japanese Journal of Surgery

SN - 0941-1291

IS - 3

ER -