Optimal scroll method for eye-gaze input system comparison of R-E and R-S compatibility

Atsuo Murata; Makoto Moriwaka; Yusuke Takagishi

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-20916-6_9

Optimal scroll method for eye-gaze input system comparison of R-E and R-S compatibility

Atsuo Murata, Makoto Moriwaka, Yusuke Takagishi

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution

Abstract

It is not clear which of the R-E and the S-R compatibility principles is proper for the eye-gaze input. This issue should be addressed for the development of more usable eye-gaze input system. The aim of this study was to explore which of the two compatibility principles was proper for the eye-gaze input system. For all scroll methods, the task completion time did not differ between R-E and S-R compatibility conditions (see Fig. 4). In other words, the speed of scroll did not differ between two compatibility conditions for all of three scroll methods. The number of errors per 90 trials significantly differed among scroll conditions and between R-E and S-R compatibility conditions. Judging from the accuracy of scroll, the error was less when the S-R compatibility like non-touch screen Microsoft Windows was applied than when the R-E compatibility like iPod or iPad was applied. In the range of this study, it seems that the S-R compatibility is dominant from the viewpoints of scroll accuracy for all of three scroll methods. The subjective rating on both usability and fatigue also supported the superiority of S-R compatibility over the R-E compatibility condition. In conclusion, the S-R compatibility was found to be superior for the eye-gaze input system.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Human-Computer Interaction
Subtitle of host publication	Interaction Technologies - 17th International Conference, HCI International 2015, Proceedings
Editors	Masaaki Kurosu
Publisher	Springer Verlag
Pages	86-93
Number of pages	8
ISBN (Print)	9783319209159
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20916-6_9
Publication status	Published - Jan 1 2015
Event	17th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, HCI International 2015 - Los Angeles, United States Duration: Aug 2 2015 → Aug 7 2015

Publication series

Name	Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
Volume	9170
ISSN (Print)	0302-9743
ISSN (Electronic)	1611-3349

Other

Other	17th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, HCI International 2015
Country/Territory	United States
City	Los Angeles
Period	8/2/15 → 8/7/15

Keywords

Auto scroll
Eye-gaze input
R-E compatibility
S-R compatibility
Scroll
Scroll icon

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Theoretical Computer Science
Computer Science(all)

Access to Document

10.1007/978-3-319-20916-6_9

Cite this

Murata, A., Moriwaka, M., & Takagishi, Y. (2015). Optimal scroll method for eye-gaze input system comparison of R-E and R-S compatibility. In M. Kurosu (Ed.), Human-Computer Interaction: Interaction Technologies - 17th International Conference, HCI International 2015, Proceedings (pp. 86-93). (Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics); Vol. 9170). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20916-6_9

Optimal scroll method for eye-gaze input system comparison of R-E and R-S compatibility. / Murata, Atsuo; Moriwaka, Makoto; Takagishi, Yusuke.

Human-Computer Interaction: Interaction Technologies - 17th International Conference, HCI International 2015, Proceedings. ed. / Masaaki Kurosu. Springer Verlag, 2015. p. 86-93 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics); Vol. 9170).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution

Murata, A, Moriwaka, M & Takagishi, Y 2015, Optimal scroll method for eye-gaze input system comparison of R-E and R-S compatibility. in M Kurosu (ed.), Human-Computer Interaction: Interaction Technologies - 17th International Conference, HCI International 2015, Proceedings. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), vol. 9170, Springer Verlag, pp. 86-93, 17th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, HCI International 2015, Los Angeles, United States, 8/2/15. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20916-6_9

Murata A, Moriwaka M, Takagishi Y. Optimal scroll method for eye-gaze input system comparison of R-E and R-S compatibility. In Kurosu M, editor, Human-Computer Interaction: Interaction Technologies - 17th International Conference, HCI International 2015, Proceedings. Springer Verlag. 2015. p. 86-93. (Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-20916-6_9

Murata, Atsuo ; Moriwaka, Makoto ; Takagishi, Yusuke. / Optimal scroll method for eye-gaze input system comparison of R-E and R-S compatibility. Human-Computer Interaction: Interaction Technologies - 17th International Conference, HCI International 2015, Proceedings. editor / Masaaki Kurosu. Springer Verlag, 2015. pp. 86-93 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)).

@inproceedings{61f24dae2d01491a82df7c549399d697,

title = "Optimal scroll method for eye-gaze input system comparison of R-E and R-S compatibility",

abstract = "It is not clear which of the R-E and the S-R compatibility principles is proper for the eye-gaze input. This issue should be addressed for the development of more usable eye-gaze input system. The aim of this study was to explore which of the two compatibility principles was proper for the eye-gaze input system. For all scroll methods, the task completion time did not differ between R-E and S-R compatibility conditions (see Fig. 4). In other words, the speed of scroll did not differ between two compatibility conditions for all of three scroll methods. The number of errors per 90 trials significantly differed among scroll conditions and between R-E and S-R compatibility conditions. Judging from the accuracy of scroll, the error was less when the S-R compatibility like non-touch screen Microsoft Windows was applied than when the R-E compatibility like iPod or iPad was applied. In the range of this study, it seems that the S-R compatibility is dominant from the viewpoints of scroll accuracy for all of three scroll methods. The subjective rating on both usability and fatigue also supported the superiority of S-R compatibility over the R-E compatibility condition. In conclusion, the S-R compatibility was found to be superior for the eye-gaze input system.",

keywords = "Auto scroll, Eye-gaze input, R-E compatibility, S-R compatibility, Scroll, Scroll icon",

author = "Atsuo Murata and Makoto Moriwaka and Yusuke Takagishi",

year = "2015",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-20916-6_9",

language = "English",

isbn = "9783319209159",

series = "Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)",

publisher = "Springer Verlag",

pages = "86--93",

editor = "Masaaki Kurosu",

booktitle = "Human-Computer Interaction",

note = "17th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, HCI International 2015 ; Conference date: 02-08-2015 Through 07-08-2015",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Optimal scroll method for eye-gaze input system comparison of R-E and R-S compatibility

AU - Murata, Atsuo

AU - Moriwaka, Makoto

AU - Takagishi, Yusuke

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - It is not clear which of the R-E and the S-R compatibility principles is proper for the eye-gaze input. This issue should be addressed for the development of more usable eye-gaze input system. The aim of this study was to explore which of the two compatibility principles was proper for the eye-gaze input system. For all scroll methods, the task completion time did not differ between R-E and S-R compatibility conditions (see Fig. 4). In other words, the speed of scroll did not differ between two compatibility conditions for all of three scroll methods. The number of errors per 90 trials significantly differed among scroll conditions and between R-E and S-R compatibility conditions. Judging from the accuracy of scroll, the error was less when the S-R compatibility like non-touch screen Microsoft Windows was applied than when the R-E compatibility like iPod or iPad was applied. In the range of this study, it seems that the S-R compatibility is dominant from the viewpoints of scroll accuracy for all of three scroll methods. The subjective rating on both usability and fatigue also supported the superiority of S-R compatibility over the R-E compatibility condition. In conclusion, the S-R compatibility was found to be superior for the eye-gaze input system.

AB - It is not clear which of the R-E and the S-R compatibility principles is proper for the eye-gaze input. This issue should be addressed for the development of more usable eye-gaze input system. The aim of this study was to explore which of the two compatibility principles was proper for the eye-gaze input system. For all scroll methods, the task completion time did not differ between R-E and S-R compatibility conditions (see Fig. 4). In other words, the speed of scroll did not differ between two compatibility conditions for all of three scroll methods. The number of errors per 90 trials significantly differed among scroll conditions and between R-E and S-R compatibility conditions. Judging from the accuracy of scroll, the error was less when the S-R compatibility like non-touch screen Microsoft Windows was applied than when the R-E compatibility like iPod or iPad was applied. In the range of this study, it seems that the S-R compatibility is dominant from the viewpoints of scroll accuracy for all of three scroll methods. The subjective rating on both usability and fatigue also supported the superiority of S-R compatibility over the R-E compatibility condition. In conclusion, the S-R compatibility was found to be superior for the eye-gaze input system.

KW - Auto scroll

KW - Eye-gaze input

KW - R-E compatibility

KW - S-R compatibility

KW - Scroll

KW - Scroll icon

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84944257012&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84944257012&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-20916-6_9

DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-20916-6_9

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:84944257012

SN - 9783319209159

T3 - Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

SP - 86

EP - 93

BT - Human-Computer Interaction

A2 - Kurosu, Masaaki

PB - Springer Verlag

T2 - 17th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, HCI International 2015

Y2 - 2 August 2015 through 7 August 2015

ER -

Optimal scroll method for eye-gaze input system comparison of R-E and R-S compatibility

Abstract

Publication series

Other

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this