On the linear additivity of climate forcing-response relationships at global and continental scales

Hideo Shiogama, Dáithí A. Stone, Tatsuya Nagashima, Toru Nozawa, Seita Emori

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Within the context of the prediction, detection and attribution of climate change, a number of studies have explicitly or implicitly assumed that individual climate responses to individual forcing agents can be linearly added to obtain the total climate response to the sum of the forcing agents. This assumption of the 'linear additivity of forcing-response relationships' has been tested by previous studies, but it remains controversial whether linear additivity holds with all combinations of forcing agents, such as 'greenhouse gases plus indirect effects of anthropogenic aerosols' or 'greenhouse gases plus solar irradiance'. This study explored whether linear additivity holds in 5-year mean temperature/precipitation responses to various combinations of forcing agents in the 20th century and in a future-emissions scenario at global and continental scales. We used Model for Interdisciplinary Research on Climate version 3, which includes the first and second indirect effects of aerosols. The forcing factors considered were well-mixed greenhouse gases, the direct and indirect effects of sulphate and carbon aerosols, ozone, land-use changes, solar irradiance and volcanic aerosols (the latter three factors were specified only in the 20th-century runs). By performing and analysing an enormous matrix of forcing runs, we concluded that linear additivity holds in temperature responses for all of the combinations of forcing agents at the global and continental scales, but it breaks down for precipitation responses in certain cases of future projections.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2542-2550
Number of pages9
JournalInternational Journal of Climatology
Volume33
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

climate forcing
greenhouse gas
aerosol
irradiance
climate
volcanic aerosol
land use change
temperature
ozone
sulfate
climate change
matrix
carbon
prediction
effect

Keywords

  • Additivity
  • Climate change
  • Climate model
  • Detection and attribution
  • Future projection

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Atmospheric Science

Cite this

On the linear additivity of climate forcing-response relationships at global and continental scales. / Shiogama, Hideo; Stone, Dáithí A.; Nagashima, Tatsuya; Nozawa, Toru; Emori, Seita.

In: International Journal of Climatology, Vol. 33, No. 11, 09.2013, p. 2542-2550.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Shiogama, Hideo ; Stone, Dáithí A. ; Nagashima, Tatsuya ; Nozawa, Toru ; Emori, Seita. / On the linear additivity of climate forcing-response relationships at global and continental scales. In: International Journal of Climatology. 2013 ; Vol. 33, No. 11. pp. 2542-2550.
@article{58227946243f4db98bf8252b00c37d6a,
title = "On the linear additivity of climate forcing-response relationships at global and continental scales",
abstract = "Within the context of the prediction, detection and attribution of climate change, a number of studies have explicitly or implicitly assumed that individual climate responses to individual forcing agents can be linearly added to obtain the total climate response to the sum of the forcing agents. This assumption of the 'linear additivity of forcing-response relationships' has been tested by previous studies, but it remains controversial whether linear additivity holds with all combinations of forcing agents, such as 'greenhouse gases plus indirect effects of anthropogenic aerosols' or 'greenhouse gases plus solar irradiance'. This study explored whether linear additivity holds in 5-year mean temperature/precipitation responses to various combinations of forcing agents in the 20th century and in a future-emissions scenario at global and continental scales. We used Model for Interdisciplinary Research on Climate version 3, which includes the first and second indirect effects of aerosols. The forcing factors considered were well-mixed greenhouse gases, the direct and indirect effects of sulphate and carbon aerosols, ozone, land-use changes, solar irradiance and volcanic aerosols (the latter three factors were specified only in the 20th-century runs). By performing and analysing an enormous matrix of forcing runs, we concluded that linear additivity holds in temperature responses for all of the combinations of forcing agents at the global and continental scales, but it breaks down for precipitation responses in certain cases of future projections.",
keywords = "Additivity, Climate change, Climate model, Detection and attribution, Future projection",
author = "Hideo Shiogama and Stone, {D{\'a}ith{\'i} A.} and Tatsuya Nagashima and Toru Nozawa and Seita Emori",
year = "2013",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1002/joc.3607",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "2542--2550",
journal = "International Journal of Climatology",
issn = "0899-8418",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - On the linear additivity of climate forcing-response relationships at global and continental scales

AU - Shiogama, Hideo

AU - Stone, Dáithí A.

AU - Nagashima, Tatsuya

AU - Nozawa, Toru

AU - Emori, Seita

PY - 2013/9

Y1 - 2013/9

N2 - Within the context of the prediction, detection and attribution of climate change, a number of studies have explicitly or implicitly assumed that individual climate responses to individual forcing agents can be linearly added to obtain the total climate response to the sum of the forcing agents. This assumption of the 'linear additivity of forcing-response relationships' has been tested by previous studies, but it remains controversial whether linear additivity holds with all combinations of forcing agents, such as 'greenhouse gases plus indirect effects of anthropogenic aerosols' or 'greenhouse gases plus solar irradiance'. This study explored whether linear additivity holds in 5-year mean temperature/precipitation responses to various combinations of forcing agents in the 20th century and in a future-emissions scenario at global and continental scales. We used Model for Interdisciplinary Research on Climate version 3, which includes the first and second indirect effects of aerosols. The forcing factors considered were well-mixed greenhouse gases, the direct and indirect effects of sulphate and carbon aerosols, ozone, land-use changes, solar irradiance and volcanic aerosols (the latter three factors were specified only in the 20th-century runs). By performing and analysing an enormous matrix of forcing runs, we concluded that linear additivity holds in temperature responses for all of the combinations of forcing agents at the global and continental scales, but it breaks down for precipitation responses in certain cases of future projections.

AB - Within the context of the prediction, detection and attribution of climate change, a number of studies have explicitly or implicitly assumed that individual climate responses to individual forcing agents can be linearly added to obtain the total climate response to the sum of the forcing agents. This assumption of the 'linear additivity of forcing-response relationships' has been tested by previous studies, but it remains controversial whether linear additivity holds with all combinations of forcing agents, such as 'greenhouse gases plus indirect effects of anthropogenic aerosols' or 'greenhouse gases plus solar irradiance'. This study explored whether linear additivity holds in 5-year mean temperature/precipitation responses to various combinations of forcing agents in the 20th century and in a future-emissions scenario at global and continental scales. We used Model for Interdisciplinary Research on Climate version 3, which includes the first and second indirect effects of aerosols. The forcing factors considered were well-mixed greenhouse gases, the direct and indirect effects of sulphate and carbon aerosols, ozone, land-use changes, solar irradiance and volcanic aerosols (the latter three factors were specified only in the 20th-century runs). By performing and analysing an enormous matrix of forcing runs, we concluded that linear additivity holds in temperature responses for all of the combinations of forcing agents at the global and continental scales, but it breaks down for precipitation responses in certain cases of future projections.

KW - Additivity

KW - Climate change

KW - Climate model

KW - Detection and attribution

KW - Future projection

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84883172918&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84883172918&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/joc.3607

DO - 10.1002/joc.3607

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84883172918

VL - 33

SP - 2542

EP - 2550

JO - International Journal of Climatology

JF - International Journal of Climatology

SN - 0899-8418

IS - 11

ER -