New Evaluation Method for Postoperative Scar Redness

Koki Nakamura, Hiroyuki Irie, Shunji Sano

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Even after successful operations, ugly postoperative skin scars are often distressing to patients and their parents. To judge the success of surgical methods and postoperative treatment, postoperative scars should be evaluated using a quantitative system. Height and width are easily measured, but scar redness is not. We have developed a simple and effective method for evaluating scar redness. According to the color definitions employed in computer graphics, each color can be expressed as RGB (red, green or blue) coordinates (r, g, b): 0 ≦ r, g, b ≦ 10. The degree of scar redness is defined by the following formula: redness score (RS) = (r1 - r0)2 + (g1 - g0)2 + (b1 - b0)2. Here, (R1, g1, b1) = coordinates of the scar color and (r0, g0, b0) = coordinates of the surrounding skin color. RS was evaluated in 59 children (35 males, 24 females; ages 1 month to 12 years old) who had scar redness after congenital cardiac surgery. For each patient, scar color and surrounding skin color was identified on the color sample table. Scar redness was also evaluated by the conventional grading method: 1 = mild, 2 = moderate and 3 = severe. The RS of the colored scars ranged from 4 to 100 (38 ± 27). By the conventional grading method, 44 scars were grade 1, 15 grade 2 and none grade 3. RS was significantly higher among grade 2 than grade 1 patients, 52 ± 25 and 33 ± 27, respectively (P <0.05). Given its subjectivity, the conventional grading method yields variable data; surrounding skin color, moreover, is not considered. Our new evaluation method using RS effectively and accurately defines scar and skin colors, and allows quantitative studies of these factors.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)101-104
Number of pages4
JournalActa Medica Okayama
Volume51
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - Apr 1997

Fingerprint

Cicatrix
Color
Skin
Skin Pigmentation
Color computer graphics
Surgery
Computer Graphics
Thoracic Surgery
Parents

Keywords

  • Evaluation
  • Quantification
  • Redness
  • Redness score
  • Scar

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Nakamura, K., Irie, H., & Sano, S. (1997). New Evaluation Method for Postoperative Scar Redness. Acta Medica Okayama, 51(2), 101-104.

New Evaluation Method for Postoperative Scar Redness. / Nakamura, Koki; Irie, Hiroyuki; Sano, Shunji.

In: Acta Medica Okayama, Vol. 51, No. 2, 04.1997, p. 101-104.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nakamura, K, Irie, H & Sano, S 1997, 'New Evaluation Method for Postoperative Scar Redness', Acta Medica Okayama, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 101-104.
Nakamura K, Irie H, Sano S. New Evaluation Method for Postoperative Scar Redness. Acta Medica Okayama. 1997 Apr;51(2):101-104.
Nakamura, Koki ; Irie, Hiroyuki ; Sano, Shunji. / New Evaluation Method for Postoperative Scar Redness. In: Acta Medica Okayama. 1997 ; Vol. 51, No. 2. pp. 101-104.
@article{66a3deb0e64245f5b1aa2989ba40a832,
title = "New Evaluation Method for Postoperative Scar Redness",
abstract = "Even after successful operations, ugly postoperative skin scars are often distressing to patients and their parents. To judge the success of surgical methods and postoperative treatment, postoperative scars should be evaluated using a quantitative system. Height and width are easily measured, but scar redness is not. We have developed a simple and effective method for evaluating scar redness. According to the color definitions employed in computer graphics, each color can be expressed as RGB (red, green or blue) coordinates (r, g, b): 0 ≦ r, g, b ≦ 10. The degree of scar redness is defined by the following formula: redness score (RS) = (r1 - r0)2 + (g1 - g0)2 + (b1 - b0)2. Here, (R1, g1, b1) = coordinates of the scar color and (r0, g0, b0) = coordinates of the surrounding skin color. RS was evaluated in 59 children (35 males, 24 females; ages 1 month to 12 years old) who had scar redness after congenital cardiac surgery. For each patient, scar color and surrounding skin color was identified on the color sample table. Scar redness was also evaluated by the conventional grading method: 1 = mild, 2 = moderate and 3 = severe. The RS of the colored scars ranged from 4 to 100 (38 ± 27). By the conventional grading method, 44 scars were grade 1, 15 grade 2 and none grade 3. RS was significantly higher among grade 2 than grade 1 patients, 52 ± 25 and 33 ± 27, respectively (P <0.05). Given its subjectivity, the conventional grading method yields variable data; surrounding skin color, moreover, is not considered. Our new evaluation method using RS effectively and accurately defines scar and skin colors, and allows quantitative studies of these factors.",
keywords = "Evaluation, Quantification, Redness, Redness score, Scar",
author = "Koki Nakamura and Hiroyuki Irie and Shunji Sano",
year = "1997",
month = "4",
language = "English",
volume = "51",
pages = "101--104",
journal = "Acta Medica Okayama",
issn = "0386-300X",
publisher = "Okayama University",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - New Evaluation Method for Postoperative Scar Redness

AU - Nakamura, Koki

AU - Irie, Hiroyuki

AU - Sano, Shunji

PY - 1997/4

Y1 - 1997/4

N2 - Even after successful operations, ugly postoperative skin scars are often distressing to patients and their parents. To judge the success of surgical methods and postoperative treatment, postoperative scars should be evaluated using a quantitative system. Height and width are easily measured, but scar redness is not. We have developed a simple and effective method for evaluating scar redness. According to the color definitions employed in computer graphics, each color can be expressed as RGB (red, green or blue) coordinates (r, g, b): 0 ≦ r, g, b ≦ 10. The degree of scar redness is defined by the following formula: redness score (RS) = (r1 - r0)2 + (g1 - g0)2 + (b1 - b0)2. Here, (R1, g1, b1) = coordinates of the scar color and (r0, g0, b0) = coordinates of the surrounding skin color. RS was evaluated in 59 children (35 males, 24 females; ages 1 month to 12 years old) who had scar redness after congenital cardiac surgery. For each patient, scar color and surrounding skin color was identified on the color sample table. Scar redness was also evaluated by the conventional grading method: 1 = mild, 2 = moderate and 3 = severe. The RS of the colored scars ranged from 4 to 100 (38 ± 27). By the conventional grading method, 44 scars were grade 1, 15 grade 2 and none grade 3. RS was significantly higher among grade 2 than grade 1 patients, 52 ± 25 and 33 ± 27, respectively (P <0.05). Given its subjectivity, the conventional grading method yields variable data; surrounding skin color, moreover, is not considered. Our new evaluation method using RS effectively and accurately defines scar and skin colors, and allows quantitative studies of these factors.

AB - Even after successful operations, ugly postoperative skin scars are often distressing to patients and their parents. To judge the success of surgical methods and postoperative treatment, postoperative scars should be evaluated using a quantitative system. Height and width are easily measured, but scar redness is not. We have developed a simple and effective method for evaluating scar redness. According to the color definitions employed in computer graphics, each color can be expressed as RGB (red, green or blue) coordinates (r, g, b): 0 ≦ r, g, b ≦ 10. The degree of scar redness is defined by the following formula: redness score (RS) = (r1 - r0)2 + (g1 - g0)2 + (b1 - b0)2. Here, (R1, g1, b1) = coordinates of the scar color and (r0, g0, b0) = coordinates of the surrounding skin color. RS was evaluated in 59 children (35 males, 24 females; ages 1 month to 12 years old) who had scar redness after congenital cardiac surgery. For each patient, scar color and surrounding skin color was identified on the color sample table. Scar redness was also evaluated by the conventional grading method: 1 = mild, 2 = moderate and 3 = severe. The RS of the colored scars ranged from 4 to 100 (38 ± 27). By the conventional grading method, 44 scars were grade 1, 15 grade 2 and none grade 3. RS was significantly higher among grade 2 than grade 1 patients, 52 ± 25 and 33 ± 27, respectively (P <0.05). Given its subjectivity, the conventional grading method yields variable data; surrounding skin color, moreover, is not considered. Our new evaluation method using RS effectively and accurately defines scar and skin colors, and allows quantitative studies of these factors.

KW - Evaluation

KW - Quantification

KW - Redness

KW - Redness score

KW - Scar

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031111675&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031111675&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 9142347

AN - SCOPUS:0031111675

VL - 51

SP - 101

EP - 104

JO - Acta Medica Okayama

JF - Acta Medica Okayama

SN - 0386-300X

IS - 2

ER -