Nanoleakage expression and microshear bond strength in the resin cement/dentin interface

Patricia Makishi, Yasushi Shimada, Alireza Sadr, Shenghua Wei, Shizuko Ichinose, Junji Tagami

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate dentin sealing ability and microshear bond strength of two different resin cements. Materials and Methods: Resin composite overlays (Estenia C&B) were fabricated and cemented to mid-dentin surfaces with either a self-adhesive resin cement (RelyX Unicem) or a resin cement with a self-etching primer (Panavia F2.0). After 24 h storage in water, the specimens were sectioned, placed into 50% (w/v) ammoniacal silver nitrate solution for 24 h, exposed to photodeveloping solution and observed using FE-SEM and EDS. Percentage distribution of metallic silver particles in the resin cement/dentin interface was calculated using digital image analysis software. In addition, small resin overlay cylinders were also bonded to dentin using either of the resin cements, and their bonding performance was evaluated with the microshear bond strength test. The statistical significance was defined as p ≤ 0.05. Results: No statistically significant difference was detected in the microshear bond strength between RelyX Unicem and Panavia F2.0 (24.9 ± 4.8 and 26.1 ± 5.3 MPa, respectively, p > 0.05). However, a significant difference was detected in silver particle penetration percentage between RelyX Unicem and Panavia F2.0 (7.4 ± 4.6 and 18.7 ± 8.7 MPa, respectively). The Kruskal-Wallis mean ranks for nanoleakage were 6.8 and 14.2, respectively (p < 0.05). Conclusion: While the bond strengths of the two materials were comparable, the self-adhesive resin cement may provide better dentin sealing compared to the self-etching primer resin cement.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)393-401
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Adhesive Dentistry
Volume12
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Resin Cements
Dentin
Silver
Silver Nitrate
Composite Resins
Software
Water

Keywords

  • Microshear bond strength
  • Nanoleakage
  • Resin cement
  • Self-adhesive
  • Self-etching primer

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Nanoleakage expression and microshear bond strength in the resin cement/dentin interface. / Makishi, Patricia; Shimada, Yasushi; Sadr, Alireza; Wei, Shenghua; Ichinose, Shizuko; Tagami, Junji.

In: Journal of Adhesive Dentistry, Vol. 12, No. 5, 2010, p. 393-401.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Makishi, Patricia ; Shimada, Yasushi ; Sadr, Alireza ; Wei, Shenghua ; Ichinose, Shizuko ; Tagami, Junji. / Nanoleakage expression and microshear bond strength in the resin cement/dentin interface. In: Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. 2010 ; Vol. 12, No. 5. pp. 393-401.
@article{9ebc2940dfd64a62937c4d0249e870d9,
title = "Nanoleakage expression and microshear bond strength in the resin cement/dentin interface",
abstract = "Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate dentin sealing ability and microshear bond strength of two different resin cements. Materials and Methods: Resin composite overlays (Estenia C&B) were fabricated and cemented to mid-dentin surfaces with either a self-adhesive resin cement (RelyX Unicem) or a resin cement with a self-etching primer (Panavia F2.0). After 24 h storage in water, the specimens were sectioned, placed into 50{\%} (w/v) ammoniacal silver nitrate solution for 24 h, exposed to photodeveloping solution and observed using FE-SEM and EDS. Percentage distribution of metallic silver particles in the resin cement/dentin interface was calculated using digital image analysis software. In addition, small resin overlay cylinders were also bonded to dentin using either of the resin cements, and their bonding performance was evaluated with the microshear bond strength test. The statistical significance was defined as p ≤ 0.05. Results: No statistically significant difference was detected in the microshear bond strength between RelyX Unicem and Panavia F2.0 (24.9 ± 4.8 and 26.1 ± 5.3 MPa, respectively, p > 0.05). However, a significant difference was detected in silver particle penetration percentage between RelyX Unicem and Panavia F2.0 (7.4 ± 4.6 and 18.7 ± 8.7 MPa, respectively). The Kruskal-Wallis mean ranks for nanoleakage were 6.8 and 14.2, respectively (p < 0.05). Conclusion: While the bond strengths of the two materials were comparable, the self-adhesive resin cement may provide better dentin sealing compared to the self-etching primer resin cement.",
keywords = "Microshear bond strength, Nanoleakage, Resin cement, Self-adhesive, Self-etching primer",
author = "Patricia Makishi and Yasushi Shimada and Alireza Sadr and Shenghua Wei and Shizuko Ichinose and Junji Tagami",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.3290/j.jad.a17713",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "393--401",
journal = "Journal of Adhesive Dentistry",
issn = "1461-5185",
publisher = "Quintessence Publishing Company",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Nanoleakage expression and microshear bond strength in the resin cement/dentin interface

AU - Makishi, Patricia

AU - Shimada, Yasushi

AU - Sadr, Alireza

AU - Wei, Shenghua

AU - Ichinose, Shizuko

AU - Tagami, Junji

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate dentin sealing ability and microshear bond strength of two different resin cements. Materials and Methods: Resin composite overlays (Estenia C&B) were fabricated and cemented to mid-dentin surfaces with either a self-adhesive resin cement (RelyX Unicem) or a resin cement with a self-etching primer (Panavia F2.0). After 24 h storage in water, the specimens were sectioned, placed into 50% (w/v) ammoniacal silver nitrate solution for 24 h, exposed to photodeveloping solution and observed using FE-SEM and EDS. Percentage distribution of metallic silver particles in the resin cement/dentin interface was calculated using digital image analysis software. In addition, small resin overlay cylinders were also bonded to dentin using either of the resin cements, and their bonding performance was evaluated with the microshear bond strength test. The statistical significance was defined as p ≤ 0.05. Results: No statistically significant difference was detected in the microshear bond strength between RelyX Unicem and Panavia F2.0 (24.9 ± 4.8 and 26.1 ± 5.3 MPa, respectively, p > 0.05). However, a significant difference was detected in silver particle penetration percentage between RelyX Unicem and Panavia F2.0 (7.4 ± 4.6 and 18.7 ± 8.7 MPa, respectively). The Kruskal-Wallis mean ranks for nanoleakage were 6.8 and 14.2, respectively (p < 0.05). Conclusion: While the bond strengths of the two materials were comparable, the self-adhesive resin cement may provide better dentin sealing compared to the self-etching primer resin cement.

AB - Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate dentin sealing ability and microshear bond strength of two different resin cements. Materials and Methods: Resin composite overlays (Estenia C&B) were fabricated and cemented to mid-dentin surfaces with either a self-adhesive resin cement (RelyX Unicem) or a resin cement with a self-etching primer (Panavia F2.0). After 24 h storage in water, the specimens were sectioned, placed into 50% (w/v) ammoniacal silver nitrate solution for 24 h, exposed to photodeveloping solution and observed using FE-SEM and EDS. Percentage distribution of metallic silver particles in the resin cement/dentin interface was calculated using digital image analysis software. In addition, small resin overlay cylinders were also bonded to dentin using either of the resin cements, and their bonding performance was evaluated with the microshear bond strength test. The statistical significance was defined as p ≤ 0.05. Results: No statistically significant difference was detected in the microshear bond strength between RelyX Unicem and Panavia F2.0 (24.9 ± 4.8 and 26.1 ± 5.3 MPa, respectively, p > 0.05). However, a significant difference was detected in silver particle penetration percentage between RelyX Unicem and Panavia F2.0 (7.4 ± 4.6 and 18.7 ± 8.7 MPa, respectively). The Kruskal-Wallis mean ranks for nanoleakage were 6.8 and 14.2, respectively (p < 0.05). Conclusion: While the bond strengths of the two materials were comparable, the self-adhesive resin cement may provide better dentin sealing compared to the self-etching primer resin cement.

KW - Microshear bond strength

KW - Nanoleakage

KW - Resin cement

KW - Self-adhesive

KW - Self-etching primer

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79952110733&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79952110733&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3290/j.jad.a17713

DO - 10.3290/j.jad.a17713

M3 - Article

C2 - 20157654

AN - SCOPUS:79952110733

VL - 12

SP - 393

EP - 401

JO - Journal of Adhesive Dentistry

JF - Journal of Adhesive Dentistry

SN - 1461-5185

IS - 5

ER -