Monkey pulpal response to an MMA-based resin cement as adhesive luting for indirect restorations

Yasushi Shimada, Yuichi Seki, Mohammed Akhtar Uzzaman, Vanthana Sattabanasuk, Yasutaka Sasafuchi, Richard M. Foxton, Masayuki Otsuki, Junji Tagami

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The objective of this study was to evaluate the pulpal response to a newly-developed MMA resin cement (MultiBond, Tokuyama) when used for adhesively luting composite resin inlays. Materials and Methods: Cervical cavities were prepared in monkey teeth. The teeth were randomly divided into 3 groups. In the experimental group, a self-etching primer and a resin cement were applied to the cavities, and then hybrid composite inlays (Estenia, Kuraray) were inserted using freshly mixed resin cement. In the other groups, a zinc oxide/eugenol cement (Eugedain, Showa Yakuhin Kakou) or a glass-ionomer cement (Fuji II, GC) was used to fill the cavity. The teeth were then extracted after 3, 30, and 90 days, fixed in 10% buffered formalin solution, and prepared using routine histological techniques. Five-μm-thick sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin, or Brown & Brenn gram stain for bacterial observation. Histopathological reactions in the pulp tissue and bacterial penetration along the cavity walls were assessed using a standardized score. Results: No serious inflammatory reactions in the pulp, such as necrosis or abscess formation, were observed in any of the experimental periods, except for 1 case after 30 days, in which a pulpal exposure was suspected. Disarrangement of the odontoblast layer and deposition of reparative dentin were the major reactions observed in this specimen. No bacterial penetration along the cavity walls was detected. The monkey pulpal response and in vivo sealing ability of the MMA resin cement in combination with the self-etching primer was considered as good as that of the glass-ionomer cement. Conclusion: The new MMA resin cement showed acceptable biological compatibility to the monkey pulp when used to adhesively lute composite resin inlays.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)247-251
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Adhesive Dentistry
Volume7
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Resin Cements
Adhesives
Haplorhini
Inlays
Glass Ionomer Cements
Tooth
Composite Resins
Zinc Oxide-Eugenol Cement
Odontoblasts
Histological Techniques
Dentin
Hematoxylin
Eosine Yellowish-(YS)
Abscess
Formaldehyde
Necrosis
Observation

Keywords

  • Adhesive luting
  • Indirect restoration
  • MMA-based resin cement
  • Pulpal response

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Shimada, Y., Seki, Y., Uzzaman, M. A., Sattabanasuk, V., Sasafuchi, Y., Foxton, R. M., ... Tagami, J. (2005). Monkey pulpal response to an MMA-based resin cement as adhesive luting for indirect restorations. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry, 7(3), 247-251.

Monkey pulpal response to an MMA-based resin cement as adhesive luting for indirect restorations. / Shimada, Yasushi; Seki, Yuichi; Uzzaman, Mohammed Akhtar; Sattabanasuk, Vanthana; Sasafuchi, Yasutaka; Foxton, Richard M.; Otsuki, Masayuki; Tagami, Junji.

In: Journal of Adhesive Dentistry, Vol. 7, No. 3, 2005, p. 247-251.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Shimada, Y, Seki, Y, Uzzaman, MA, Sattabanasuk, V, Sasafuchi, Y, Foxton, RM, Otsuki, M & Tagami, J 2005, 'Monkey pulpal response to an MMA-based resin cement as adhesive luting for indirect restorations', Journal of Adhesive Dentistry, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 247-251.
Shimada Y, Seki Y, Uzzaman MA, Sattabanasuk V, Sasafuchi Y, Foxton RM et al. Monkey pulpal response to an MMA-based resin cement as adhesive luting for indirect restorations. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. 2005;7(3):247-251.
Shimada, Yasushi ; Seki, Yuichi ; Uzzaman, Mohammed Akhtar ; Sattabanasuk, Vanthana ; Sasafuchi, Yasutaka ; Foxton, Richard M. ; Otsuki, Masayuki ; Tagami, Junji. / Monkey pulpal response to an MMA-based resin cement as adhesive luting for indirect restorations. In: Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. 2005 ; Vol. 7, No. 3. pp. 247-251.
@article{c2c7fd09311942c7b7f50c16f2ba2b78,
title = "Monkey pulpal response to an MMA-based resin cement as adhesive luting for indirect restorations",
abstract = "Purpose: The objective of this study was to evaluate the pulpal response to a newly-developed MMA resin cement (MultiBond, Tokuyama) when used for adhesively luting composite resin inlays. Materials and Methods: Cervical cavities were prepared in monkey teeth. The teeth were randomly divided into 3 groups. In the experimental group, a self-etching primer and a resin cement were applied to the cavities, and then hybrid composite inlays (Estenia, Kuraray) were inserted using freshly mixed resin cement. In the other groups, a zinc oxide/eugenol cement (Eugedain, Showa Yakuhin Kakou) or a glass-ionomer cement (Fuji II, GC) was used to fill the cavity. The teeth were then extracted after 3, 30, and 90 days, fixed in 10{\%} buffered formalin solution, and prepared using routine histological techniques. Five-μm-thick sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin, or Brown & Brenn gram stain for bacterial observation. Histopathological reactions in the pulp tissue and bacterial penetration along the cavity walls were assessed using a standardized score. Results: No serious inflammatory reactions in the pulp, such as necrosis or abscess formation, were observed in any of the experimental periods, except for 1 case after 30 days, in which a pulpal exposure was suspected. Disarrangement of the odontoblast layer and deposition of reparative dentin were the major reactions observed in this specimen. No bacterial penetration along the cavity walls was detected. The monkey pulpal response and in vivo sealing ability of the MMA resin cement in combination with the self-etching primer was considered as good as that of the glass-ionomer cement. Conclusion: The new MMA resin cement showed acceptable biological compatibility to the monkey pulp when used to adhesively lute composite resin inlays.",
keywords = "Adhesive luting, Indirect restoration, MMA-based resin cement, Pulpal response",
author = "Yasushi Shimada and Yuichi Seki and Uzzaman, {Mohammed Akhtar} and Vanthana Sattabanasuk and Yasutaka Sasafuchi and Foxton, {Richard M.} and Masayuki Otsuki and Junji Tagami",
year = "2005",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "247--251",
journal = "Journal of Adhesive Dentistry",
issn = "1461-5185",
publisher = "Quintessence Publishing Company",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Monkey pulpal response to an MMA-based resin cement as adhesive luting for indirect restorations

AU - Shimada, Yasushi

AU - Seki, Yuichi

AU - Uzzaman, Mohammed Akhtar

AU - Sattabanasuk, Vanthana

AU - Sasafuchi, Yasutaka

AU - Foxton, Richard M.

AU - Otsuki, Masayuki

AU - Tagami, Junji

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - Purpose: The objective of this study was to evaluate the pulpal response to a newly-developed MMA resin cement (MultiBond, Tokuyama) when used for adhesively luting composite resin inlays. Materials and Methods: Cervical cavities were prepared in monkey teeth. The teeth were randomly divided into 3 groups. In the experimental group, a self-etching primer and a resin cement were applied to the cavities, and then hybrid composite inlays (Estenia, Kuraray) were inserted using freshly mixed resin cement. In the other groups, a zinc oxide/eugenol cement (Eugedain, Showa Yakuhin Kakou) or a glass-ionomer cement (Fuji II, GC) was used to fill the cavity. The teeth were then extracted after 3, 30, and 90 days, fixed in 10% buffered formalin solution, and prepared using routine histological techniques. Five-μm-thick sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin, or Brown & Brenn gram stain for bacterial observation. Histopathological reactions in the pulp tissue and bacterial penetration along the cavity walls were assessed using a standardized score. Results: No serious inflammatory reactions in the pulp, such as necrosis or abscess formation, were observed in any of the experimental periods, except for 1 case after 30 days, in which a pulpal exposure was suspected. Disarrangement of the odontoblast layer and deposition of reparative dentin were the major reactions observed in this specimen. No bacterial penetration along the cavity walls was detected. The monkey pulpal response and in vivo sealing ability of the MMA resin cement in combination with the self-etching primer was considered as good as that of the glass-ionomer cement. Conclusion: The new MMA resin cement showed acceptable biological compatibility to the monkey pulp when used to adhesively lute composite resin inlays.

AB - Purpose: The objective of this study was to evaluate the pulpal response to a newly-developed MMA resin cement (MultiBond, Tokuyama) when used for adhesively luting composite resin inlays. Materials and Methods: Cervical cavities were prepared in monkey teeth. The teeth were randomly divided into 3 groups. In the experimental group, a self-etching primer and a resin cement were applied to the cavities, and then hybrid composite inlays (Estenia, Kuraray) were inserted using freshly mixed resin cement. In the other groups, a zinc oxide/eugenol cement (Eugedain, Showa Yakuhin Kakou) or a glass-ionomer cement (Fuji II, GC) was used to fill the cavity. The teeth were then extracted after 3, 30, and 90 days, fixed in 10% buffered formalin solution, and prepared using routine histological techniques. Five-μm-thick sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin, or Brown & Brenn gram stain for bacterial observation. Histopathological reactions in the pulp tissue and bacterial penetration along the cavity walls were assessed using a standardized score. Results: No serious inflammatory reactions in the pulp, such as necrosis or abscess formation, were observed in any of the experimental periods, except for 1 case after 30 days, in which a pulpal exposure was suspected. Disarrangement of the odontoblast layer and deposition of reparative dentin were the major reactions observed in this specimen. No bacterial penetration along the cavity walls was detected. The monkey pulpal response and in vivo sealing ability of the MMA resin cement in combination with the self-etching primer was considered as good as that of the glass-ionomer cement. Conclusion: The new MMA resin cement showed acceptable biological compatibility to the monkey pulp when used to adhesively lute composite resin inlays.

KW - Adhesive luting

KW - Indirect restoration

KW - MMA-based resin cement

KW - Pulpal response

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=26444538498&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=26444538498&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 16240967

AN - SCOPUS:26444538498

VL - 7

SP - 247

EP - 251

JO - Journal of Adhesive Dentistry

JF - Journal of Adhesive Dentistry

SN - 1461-5185

IS - 3

ER -