Abstract
The purpose of this paper was to compare the bond strengths of the self-adhesive luting cements between ceramics and resin cores and examine their relation to the cement thickness. Three self-adhesive luting cements (Smartcem, Maxcem, and G-CEM) and a resin cement (Panavia F 2.0) for control were used in the paper. The thickness of the cements was controlled in approximately 25, 50, 100, or μ200m. Each 10 specimens were made according to the manufacturers instructions and stored in water at 37C. After 24 hours, microtensile bond strength (μTBS) was measured. There were significant differences in cements. Three self-adhesive cements showed significantly lower TBSs than control that required both etching and priming before cementation (Tukey, P <0.05). The cement thickness of 50 or 100m tended to induce the highest TBSs for each self-adhesive luting cements though no difference was found.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 278623 |
| Journal | International Journal of Dentistry |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2012 |
Fingerprint
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Dentistry(all)
Cite this
Microtensile bond strength of self-adhesive luting cements to ceramics. / Abo, Tomoko; Uno, Shigeru; Yoshiyama, Masahiro; Yamada, Toshimoto; Hanada, Nobuhiro.
In: International Journal of Dentistry, 2012.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Microtensile bond strength of self-adhesive luting cements to ceramics
AU - Abo, Tomoko
AU - Uno, Shigeru
AU - Yoshiyama, Masahiro
AU - Yamada, Toshimoto
AU - Hanada, Nobuhiro
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - The purpose of this paper was to compare the bond strengths of the self-adhesive luting cements between ceramics and resin cores and examine their relation to the cement thickness. Three self-adhesive luting cements (Smartcem, Maxcem, and G-CEM) and a resin cement (Panavia F 2.0) for control were used in the paper. The thickness of the cements was controlled in approximately 25, 50, 100, or μ200m. Each 10 specimens were made according to the manufacturers instructions and stored in water at 37C. After 24 hours, microtensile bond strength (μTBS) was measured. There were significant differences in cements. Three self-adhesive cements showed significantly lower TBSs than control that required both etching and priming before cementation (Tukey, P <0.05). The cement thickness of 50 or 100m tended to induce the highest TBSs for each self-adhesive luting cements though no difference was found.
AB - The purpose of this paper was to compare the bond strengths of the self-adhesive luting cements between ceramics and resin cores and examine their relation to the cement thickness. Three self-adhesive luting cements (Smartcem, Maxcem, and G-CEM) and a resin cement (Panavia F 2.0) for control were used in the paper. The thickness of the cements was controlled in approximately 25, 50, 100, or μ200m. Each 10 specimens were made according to the manufacturers instructions and stored in water at 37C. After 24 hours, microtensile bond strength (μTBS) was measured. There were significant differences in cements. Three self-adhesive cements showed significantly lower TBSs than control that required both etching and priming before cementation (Tukey, P <0.05). The cement thickness of 50 or 100m tended to induce the highest TBSs for each self-adhesive luting cements though no difference was found.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84861015640&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84861015640&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1155/2012/278623
DO - 10.1155/2012/278623
M3 - Article
C2 - 22606202
AN - SCOPUS:84861015640
JO - International Journal of Dentistry
JF - International Journal of Dentistry
SN - 1687-8728
M1 - 278623
ER -