Marginal gap formation of light-activated restorative materials: Effects of immediate setting shrinkage and bond strength

M. Irie, K. Suzuki, D. C. Watts

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

81 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to explore multiple correlations between shrinkage, bonding and marginal gap parameters, immediately after light-activation, for three classes of restorative materials. The correlations of interest were between: (a) their marginal gap formation in tooth cavities, (b) their free setting shrinkage-strain determined by two different measurement methods ((i) the marginal gap-width in a non-bonding Teflon cavity and (ii) a linear (diametral) measure of shrinkage-strain), and (c) their shear bond strengths to enamel and to dentin. Methods: The maximum marginal gap width and the opposing width (if any) in the tooth cavity were measured immediately (3min) after light-activation. Two factors for the setting shrinkage-strain and the shear bond strength to enamel and to dentin were measured concomitantly. Results: Out of the set of restorative materials investigated, those that produced a smaller marginal gap in the tooth cavity had a smaller marginal gap in the Teflon cavity. There was a highly significant correlation between the two parameters (r=0.914, p0.05). Thus the restorative materials that produced a smaller marginal gap in the tooth cavity did not generally have a smaller diametral setting shrinkage-strain. Furthermore, no relationship was observed between the marginal gap in the tooth cavity and the shear bond strength to enamel or to dentin (p>0.50). Significance: For light-activated restorative materials during the early stage of setting (

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)203-210
Number of pages8
JournalDental Materials
Volume18
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2002

Fingerprint

Tooth
Shear Strength
Enamels
Light
Dentin
Dental Enamel
Polytetrafluoroethylene
Polytetrafluoroethylenes
Chemical activation

Keywords

  • Bond strength
  • Compomer
  • Light curing
  • Marginal gap formation
  • Resin composite
  • Resin-modified glass-ionomer cement
  • Setting shrinkage

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Marginal gap formation of light-activated restorative materials : Effects of immediate setting shrinkage and bond strength. / Irie, M.; Suzuki, K.; Watts, D. C.

In: Dental Materials, Vol. 18, No. 3, 05.2002, p. 203-210.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{38227e3eab014765803acfd63b19a1ce,
title = "Marginal gap formation of light-activated restorative materials: Effects of immediate setting shrinkage and bond strength",
abstract = "Objectives: The purpose of this study was to explore multiple correlations between shrinkage, bonding and marginal gap parameters, immediately after light-activation, for three classes of restorative materials. The correlations of interest were between: (a) their marginal gap formation in tooth cavities, (b) their free setting shrinkage-strain determined by two different measurement methods ((i) the marginal gap-width in a non-bonding Teflon cavity and (ii) a linear (diametral) measure of shrinkage-strain), and (c) their shear bond strengths to enamel and to dentin. Methods: The maximum marginal gap width and the opposing width (if any) in the tooth cavity were measured immediately (3min) after light-activation. Two factors for the setting shrinkage-strain and the shear bond strength to enamel and to dentin were measured concomitantly. Results: Out of the set of restorative materials investigated, those that produced a smaller marginal gap in the tooth cavity had a smaller marginal gap in the Teflon cavity. There was a highly significant correlation between the two parameters (r=0.914, p0.05). Thus the restorative materials that produced a smaller marginal gap in the tooth cavity did not generally have a smaller diametral setting shrinkage-strain. Furthermore, no relationship was observed between the marginal gap in the tooth cavity and the shear bond strength to enamel or to dentin (p>0.50). Significance: For light-activated restorative materials during the early stage of setting (",
keywords = "Bond strength, Compomer, Light curing, Marginal gap formation, Resin composite, Resin-modified glass-ionomer cement, Setting shrinkage",
author = "M. Irie and K. Suzuki and Watts, {D. C.}",
year = "2002",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/S0109-5641(01)00083-5",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "203--210",
journal = "Dental Materials",
issn = "0109-5641",
publisher = "Elsevier Science",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Marginal gap formation of light-activated restorative materials

T2 - Effects of immediate setting shrinkage and bond strength

AU - Irie, M.

AU - Suzuki, K.

AU - Watts, D. C.

PY - 2002/5

Y1 - 2002/5

N2 - Objectives: The purpose of this study was to explore multiple correlations between shrinkage, bonding and marginal gap parameters, immediately after light-activation, for three classes of restorative materials. The correlations of interest were between: (a) their marginal gap formation in tooth cavities, (b) their free setting shrinkage-strain determined by two different measurement methods ((i) the marginal gap-width in a non-bonding Teflon cavity and (ii) a linear (diametral) measure of shrinkage-strain), and (c) their shear bond strengths to enamel and to dentin. Methods: The maximum marginal gap width and the opposing width (if any) in the tooth cavity were measured immediately (3min) after light-activation. Two factors for the setting shrinkage-strain and the shear bond strength to enamel and to dentin were measured concomitantly. Results: Out of the set of restorative materials investigated, those that produced a smaller marginal gap in the tooth cavity had a smaller marginal gap in the Teflon cavity. There was a highly significant correlation between the two parameters (r=0.914, p0.05). Thus the restorative materials that produced a smaller marginal gap in the tooth cavity did not generally have a smaller diametral setting shrinkage-strain. Furthermore, no relationship was observed between the marginal gap in the tooth cavity and the shear bond strength to enamel or to dentin (p>0.50). Significance: For light-activated restorative materials during the early stage of setting (

AB - Objectives: The purpose of this study was to explore multiple correlations between shrinkage, bonding and marginal gap parameters, immediately after light-activation, for three classes of restorative materials. The correlations of interest were between: (a) their marginal gap formation in tooth cavities, (b) their free setting shrinkage-strain determined by two different measurement methods ((i) the marginal gap-width in a non-bonding Teflon cavity and (ii) a linear (diametral) measure of shrinkage-strain), and (c) their shear bond strengths to enamel and to dentin. Methods: The maximum marginal gap width and the opposing width (if any) in the tooth cavity were measured immediately (3min) after light-activation. Two factors for the setting shrinkage-strain and the shear bond strength to enamel and to dentin were measured concomitantly. Results: Out of the set of restorative materials investigated, those that produced a smaller marginal gap in the tooth cavity had a smaller marginal gap in the Teflon cavity. There was a highly significant correlation between the two parameters (r=0.914, p0.05). Thus the restorative materials that produced a smaller marginal gap in the tooth cavity did not generally have a smaller diametral setting shrinkage-strain. Furthermore, no relationship was observed between the marginal gap in the tooth cavity and the shear bond strength to enamel or to dentin (p>0.50). Significance: For light-activated restorative materials during the early stage of setting (

KW - Bond strength

KW - Compomer

KW - Light curing

KW - Marginal gap formation

KW - Resin composite

KW - Resin-modified glass-ionomer cement

KW - Setting shrinkage

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036582841&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036582841&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0109-5641(01)00083-5

DO - 10.1016/S0109-5641(01)00083-5

M3 - Article

C2 - 11823011

AN - SCOPUS:0036582841

VL - 18

SP - 203

EP - 210

JO - Dental Materials

JF - Dental Materials

SN - 0109-5641

IS - 3

ER -