Mandibular stability after SSRO with or without postoperative maxillo-mandibular fixation for class III malocclusion

Tomohiro Yamada, Katsuaki Mishima, Tatsushi Matsumura, Norifumi Moritani, Toshio Sugahara

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the usefulness of maxillo-mandibular fixation (MMF) from a viewpoint of skeletal and occlusal stability and to investigate the complications after surgery with and without MMF. Materials and methods: Twenty-seven patients who underwent surgical correction of class III malocclusion were analyzed. The surgical procedure in all cases consisted of a bilateral sagittal splitting ramus osteotomy (SSRO). The segments were then fixed rigidly with titanium screws. A postoperative MMF was performed in 13 patients within 1 day of the SSRO. The MMF lasted for 1 week. The other 14 patients were free to move their jaw on the day of the surgery and received occlusal guidance with elastics starting from the third postoperative day. Cephalograms were taken preoperatively, at 1 day postoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery. Skeletal and occlusal stabilities along with postoperative complications were then assessed. Results: Discomfort of the pharynx and postoperative pain was more severe in the MMF group. Even without MMF, occlusion was guided to the ideal position by an average of 5.3 days after surgery. Occlusal and skeletal stability was satisfactory in both groups, and there was no correlation between the surgical results and postoperative MMF. Conclusion: MMF may not be necessary after a rigid fixation SSRO, considering the risks of airway problems.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)177-180
Number of pages4
JournalOral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume12
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008

Fingerprint

Malocclusion
Osteotomy
Ambulatory Surgical Procedures
Dental Occlusion
Postoperative Pain
Pharynx
Titanium
Jaw

Keywords

  • Maxillo-mandibular fixation (MMF)
  • Orthognathic surgery
  • Rigid fixation
  • Sagittal split of ramus osteotomy (SSRO)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Surgery
  • Oral Surgery

Cite this

Mandibular stability after SSRO with or without postoperative maxillo-mandibular fixation for class III malocclusion. / Yamada, Tomohiro; Mishima, Katsuaki; Matsumura, Tatsushi; Moritani, Norifumi; Sugahara, Toshio.

In: Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Vol. 12, No. 4, 2008, p. 177-180.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8a5622f6f3fd4944948c2972cea1810d,
title = "Mandibular stability after SSRO with or without postoperative maxillo-mandibular fixation for class III malocclusion",
abstract = "Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the usefulness of maxillo-mandibular fixation (MMF) from a viewpoint of skeletal and occlusal stability and to investigate the complications after surgery with and without MMF. Materials and methods: Twenty-seven patients who underwent surgical correction of class III malocclusion were analyzed. The surgical procedure in all cases consisted of a bilateral sagittal splitting ramus osteotomy (SSRO). The segments were then fixed rigidly with titanium screws. A postoperative MMF was performed in 13 patients within 1 day of the SSRO. The MMF lasted for 1 week. The other 14 patients were free to move their jaw on the day of the surgery and received occlusal guidance with elastics starting from the third postoperative day. Cephalograms were taken preoperatively, at 1 day postoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery. Skeletal and occlusal stabilities along with postoperative complications were then assessed. Results: Discomfort of the pharynx and postoperative pain was more severe in the MMF group. Even without MMF, occlusion was guided to the ideal position by an average of 5.3 days after surgery. Occlusal and skeletal stability was satisfactory in both groups, and there was no correlation between the surgical results and postoperative MMF. Conclusion: MMF may not be necessary after a rigid fixation SSRO, considering the risks of airway problems.",
keywords = "Maxillo-mandibular fixation (MMF), Orthognathic surgery, Rigid fixation, Sagittal split of ramus osteotomy (SSRO)",
author = "Tomohiro Yamada and Katsuaki Mishima and Tatsushi Matsumura and Norifumi Moritani and Toshio Sugahara",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1007/s10006-008-0120-x",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "177--180",
journal = "Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery",
issn = "1865-1550",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mandibular stability after SSRO with or without postoperative maxillo-mandibular fixation for class III malocclusion

AU - Yamada, Tomohiro

AU - Mishima, Katsuaki

AU - Matsumura, Tatsushi

AU - Moritani, Norifumi

AU - Sugahara, Toshio

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the usefulness of maxillo-mandibular fixation (MMF) from a viewpoint of skeletal and occlusal stability and to investigate the complications after surgery with and without MMF. Materials and methods: Twenty-seven patients who underwent surgical correction of class III malocclusion were analyzed. The surgical procedure in all cases consisted of a bilateral sagittal splitting ramus osteotomy (SSRO). The segments were then fixed rigidly with titanium screws. A postoperative MMF was performed in 13 patients within 1 day of the SSRO. The MMF lasted for 1 week. The other 14 patients were free to move their jaw on the day of the surgery and received occlusal guidance with elastics starting from the third postoperative day. Cephalograms were taken preoperatively, at 1 day postoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery. Skeletal and occlusal stabilities along with postoperative complications were then assessed. Results: Discomfort of the pharynx and postoperative pain was more severe in the MMF group. Even without MMF, occlusion was guided to the ideal position by an average of 5.3 days after surgery. Occlusal and skeletal stability was satisfactory in both groups, and there was no correlation between the surgical results and postoperative MMF. Conclusion: MMF may not be necessary after a rigid fixation SSRO, considering the risks of airway problems.

AB - Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the usefulness of maxillo-mandibular fixation (MMF) from a viewpoint of skeletal and occlusal stability and to investigate the complications after surgery with and without MMF. Materials and methods: Twenty-seven patients who underwent surgical correction of class III malocclusion were analyzed. The surgical procedure in all cases consisted of a bilateral sagittal splitting ramus osteotomy (SSRO). The segments were then fixed rigidly with titanium screws. A postoperative MMF was performed in 13 patients within 1 day of the SSRO. The MMF lasted for 1 week. The other 14 patients were free to move their jaw on the day of the surgery and received occlusal guidance with elastics starting from the third postoperative day. Cephalograms were taken preoperatively, at 1 day postoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery. Skeletal and occlusal stabilities along with postoperative complications were then assessed. Results: Discomfort of the pharynx and postoperative pain was more severe in the MMF group. Even without MMF, occlusion was guided to the ideal position by an average of 5.3 days after surgery. Occlusal and skeletal stability was satisfactory in both groups, and there was no correlation between the surgical results and postoperative MMF. Conclusion: MMF may not be necessary after a rigid fixation SSRO, considering the risks of airway problems.

KW - Maxillo-mandibular fixation (MMF)

KW - Orthognathic surgery

KW - Rigid fixation

KW - Sagittal split of ramus osteotomy (SSRO)

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=59349118576&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=59349118576&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10006-008-0120-x

DO - 10.1007/s10006-008-0120-x

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 177

EP - 180

JO - Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

JF - Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

SN - 1865-1550

IS - 4

ER -