Long-term follow-up study on drop-out TMD patients with self-administered questionnaires

Hirofumi Yatani, Takushi Kaneshima, Takuo Kuboki, Akio Yoshimoto, Yoshizo Matsuka, Atsushi Yamashita

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although patient attrition might be a serious threat to the validity of treatment-outcome studies on temporomandibular disorders (TMD), studies on TMD patient attrition are scarce. Of the 1405 consecutive TMD patients examined in a recent 10-year period, 367 (26.1%) drop-out patients or patients identified with a control group were sampled. A mailed questionnaire failed to reach 41 patients, and 203 (62.3%) were returned. The questionnaire elicited information on reasons for dropping out, changes in symptoms, treatment received in other clinics after dropping out, present treatment needs, and current signs and symptoms. Dropouts were divided into two groups: (1) those who failed to show up for their first scheduled appointment after the clinical examination; (2) those who failed to complete treatment. A group of patients who were judged by the examiner not to need treatment were included as a control group. The main reasons for dropping out were environmental obstacles, perceived improvement of the disease, and dissatisfaction with services. Only 21.7% considered themselves to be in need of treatment, and only 10.3% had visited other clinics after dropping out. Only 8.9% complained of the continued aggravation of symptoms, whereas 57.6% reported improvement. In addition, pain, dysfunction, and daily activity limitation tended to improve with time, although temporomandibular joint noise tended to persist. These results suggest that TMD signs and symptoms tend to decrease in patients after dropping out, and that the natural fluctuation of TMD signs and symptoms should be taken into consideration when treating TMD.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)258-269
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Orofacial Pain
Volume11
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 1997

Fingerprint

Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
Signs and Symptoms
Therapeutics
Control Groups
Surveys and Questionnaires
Temporomandibular Joint
Noise
Appointments and Schedules
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Pain

Keywords

  • Attrition
  • Noncompliance
  • Temporomandibular disorder
  • Treatment need

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Yatani, H., Kaneshima, T., Kuboki, T., Yoshimoto, A., Matsuka, Y., & Yamashita, A. (1997). Long-term follow-up study on drop-out TMD patients with self-administered questionnaires. Journal of Orofacial Pain, 11(3), 258-269.

Long-term follow-up study on drop-out TMD patients with self-administered questionnaires. / Yatani, Hirofumi; Kaneshima, Takushi; Kuboki, Takuo; Yoshimoto, Akio; Matsuka, Yoshizo; Yamashita, Atsushi.

In: Journal of Orofacial Pain, Vol. 11, No. 3, 1997, p. 258-269.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Yatani, H, Kaneshima, T, Kuboki, T, Yoshimoto, A, Matsuka, Y & Yamashita, A 1997, 'Long-term follow-up study on drop-out TMD patients with self-administered questionnaires', Journal of Orofacial Pain, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 258-269.
Yatani H, Kaneshima T, Kuboki T, Yoshimoto A, Matsuka Y, Yamashita A. Long-term follow-up study on drop-out TMD patients with self-administered questionnaires. Journal of Orofacial Pain. 1997;11(3):258-269.
Yatani, Hirofumi ; Kaneshima, Takushi ; Kuboki, Takuo ; Yoshimoto, Akio ; Matsuka, Yoshizo ; Yamashita, Atsushi. / Long-term follow-up study on drop-out TMD patients with self-administered questionnaires. In: Journal of Orofacial Pain. 1997 ; Vol. 11, No. 3. pp. 258-269.
@article{c839dd4cd7a54235ae90fe9b52318ebc,
title = "Long-term follow-up study on drop-out TMD patients with self-administered questionnaires",
abstract = "Although patient attrition might be a serious threat to the validity of treatment-outcome studies on temporomandibular disorders (TMD), studies on TMD patient attrition are scarce. Of the 1405 consecutive TMD patients examined in a recent 10-year period, 367 (26.1{\%}) drop-out patients or patients identified with a control group were sampled. A mailed questionnaire failed to reach 41 patients, and 203 (62.3{\%}) were returned. The questionnaire elicited information on reasons for dropping out, changes in symptoms, treatment received in other clinics after dropping out, present treatment needs, and current signs and symptoms. Dropouts were divided into two groups: (1) those who failed to show up for their first scheduled appointment after the clinical examination; (2) those who failed to complete treatment. A group of patients who were judged by the examiner not to need treatment were included as a control group. The main reasons for dropping out were environmental obstacles, perceived improvement of the disease, and dissatisfaction with services. Only 21.7{\%} considered themselves to be in need of treatment, and only 10.3{\%} had visited other clinics after dropping out. Only 8.9{\%} complained of the continued aggravation of symptoms, whereas 57.6{\%} reported improvement. In addition, pain, dysfunction, and daily activity limitation tended to improve with time, although temporomandibular joint noise tended to persist. These results suggest that TMD signs and symptoms tend to decrease in patients after dropping out, and that the natural fluctuation of TMD signs and symptoms should be taken into consideration when treating TMD.",
keywords = "Attrition, Noncompliance, Temporomandibular disorder, Treatment need",
author = "Hirofumi Yatani and Takushi Kaneshima and Takuo Kuboki and Akio Yoshimoto and Yoshizo Matsuka and Atsushi Yamashita",
year = "1997",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "258--269",
journal = "Journal of Orofacial Pain",
issn = "1064-6655",
publisher = "Quintessence Publishing Company",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Long-term follow-up study on drop-out TMD patients with self-administered questionnaires

AU - Yatani, Hirofumi

AU - Kaneshima, Takushi

AU - Kuboki, Takuo

AU - Yoshimoto, Akio

AU - Matsuka, Yoshizo

AU - Yamashita, Atsushi

PY - 1997

Y1 - 1997

N2 - Although patient attrition might be a serious threat to the validity of treatment-outcome studies on temporomandibular disorders (TMD), studies on TMD patient attrition are scarce. Of the 1405 consecutive TMD patients examined in a recent 10-year period, 367 (26.1%) drop-out patients or patients identified with a control group were sampled. A mailed questionnaire failed to reach 41 patients, and 203 (62.3%) were returned. The questionnaire elicited information on reasons for dropping out, changes in symptoms, treatment received in other clinics after dropping out, present treatment needs, and current signs and symptoms. Dropouts were divided into two groups: (1) those who failed to show up for their first scheduled appointment after the clinical examination; (2) those who failed to complete treatment. A group of patients who were judged by the examiner not to need treatment were included as a control group. The main reasons for dropping out were environmental obstacles, perceived improvement of the disease, and dissatisfaction with services. Only 21.7% considered themselves to be in need of treatment, and only 10.3% had visited other clinics after dropping out. Only 8.9% complained of the continued aggravation of symptoms, whereas 57.6% reported improvement. In addition, pain, dysfunction, and daily activity limitation tended to improve with time, although temporomandibular joint noise tended to persist. These results suggest that TMD signs and symptoms tend to decrease in patients after dropping out, and that the natural fluctuation of TMD signs and symptoms should be taken into consideration when treating TMD.

AB - Although patient attrition might be a serious threat to the validity of treatment-outcome studies on temporomandibular disorders (TMD), studies on TMD patient attrition are scarce. Of the 1405 consecutive TMD patients examined in a recent 10-year period, 367 (26.1%) drop-out patients or patients identified with a control group were sampled. A mailed questionnaire failed to reach 41 patients, and 203 (62.3%) were returned. The questionnaire elicited information on reasons for dropping out, changes in symptoms, treatment received in other clinics after dropping out, present treatment needs, and current signs and symptoms. Dropouts were divided into two groups: (1) those who failed to show up for their first scheduled appointment after the clinical examination; (2) those who failed to complete treatment. A group of patients who were judged by the examiner not to need treatment were included as a control group. The main reasons for dropping out were environmental obstacles, perceived improvement of the disease, and dissatisfaction with services. Only 21.7% considered themselves to be in need of treatment, and only 10.3% had visited other clinics after dropping out. Only 8.9% complained of the continued aggravation of symptoms, whereas 57.6% reported improvement. In addition, pain, dysfunction, and daily activity limitation tended to improve with time, although temporomandibular joint noise tended to persist. These results suggest that TMD signs and symptoms tend to decrease in patients after dropping out, and that the natural fluctuation of TMD signs and symptoms should be taken into consideration when treating TMD.

KW - Attrition

KW - Noncompliance

KW - Temporomandibular disorder

KW - Treatment need

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031151222&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031151222&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 258

EP - 269

JO - Journal of Orofacial Pain

JF - Journal of Orofacial Pain

SN - 1064-6655

IS - 3

ER -