Is Continuous Flow Superior to Pulsatile Flow in Single Ventricle Mechanical Support? Results from a Large Animal Pilot Study

Yasuhiro Fujii, Giuseppe Ferro, Hiroshi Kagawa, Luca Centola, Liqun Zhu, William T. Ferrier, Linda Talken, R. Kirk Riemer, Katsuhide Maeda, Teimour Nasirov, Bill Hodges, Saleh Amirriazi, Eric Lee, Donald Sheff, Judith May, Robert May, Olaf Reinhartz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Durable mechanical support in situations of physiologic single ventricle has been met with little success so far, particularly in small children. We created an animal model to investigate whether pulsatile or continuous flow would be superior. Three 1 month old sheep (10-16 kg) were instrumented. Via sternotomy and with cardiopulmonary bypass, a large ventricular septal defect and atrial septal defect were created. The left ventricle was cannulated using a Berlin Heart inflow cannula. This was connected sequentially to a continuous flow device (Thoratec HeartMate X, Pleasanton, CA) and to a pulsatile device (Berlin Heart Excor, The Woodlands, TX). Outflow was via a Y-graft to both aorta and pulmonary artery, striving for equal flow to both. Atrial filling pressures were controlled with volume infusions over a wide range. Under comparable loading conditions, significantly higher maximum flow was obtained by HeartMate X than by Excor (4.95 ± 1.27 L/min [range, 3.84-6.34 L/min] for HeartMate X vs. 1.80 ± 0.85 L/min [range, 1.01-2.7 L/min] for Excor; p <0.05). Judging from this limited animal study, in single ventricle scenarios, continuous flow devices may achieve higher pump flows than pulsatile devices when provided with similar filling pressures. Their clinical use should be investigated. More extensive experimental studies are needed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)443-447
Number of pages5
JournalASAIO Journal
Volume61
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 21 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Pulsatile Flow
Pulsatile flow
Animals
Equipment and Supplies
Defects
Berlin
Grafts
Pumps
Atrial Pressure
Sternotomy
Atrial Heart Septal Defects
Ventricular Heart Septal Defects
Cardiopulmonary Bypass
Pulmonary Artery
Heart Ventricles
Aorta
Sheep
Animal Models
Transplants
Pressure

Keywords

  • animal model
  • axial pump
  • pneumatic pulsatile pump
  • single ventricle
  • ventricular assist device

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Biomaterials
  • Bioengineering
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Is Continuous Flow Superior to Pulsatile Flow in Single Ventricle Mechanical Support? Results from a Large Animal Pilot Study. / Fujii, Yasuhiro; Ferro, Giuseppe; Kagawa, Hiroshi; Centola, Luca; Zhu, Liqun; Ferrier, William T.; Talken, Linda; Riemer, R. Kirk; Maeda, Katsuhide; Nasirov, Teimour; Hodges, Bill; Amirriazi, Saleh; Lee, Eric; Sheff, Donald; May, Judith; May, Robert; Reinhartz, Olaf.

In: ASAIO Journal, Vol. 61, No. 4, 21.07.2015, p. 443-447.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fujii, Y, Ferro, G, Kagawa, H, Centola, L, Zhu, L, Ferrier, WT, Talken, L, Riemer, RK, Maeda, K, Nasirov, T, Hodges, B, Amirriazi, S, Lee, E, Sheff, D, May, J, May, R & Reinhartz, O 2015, 'Is Continuous Flow Superior to Pulsatile Flow in Single Ventricle Mechanical Support? Results from a Large Animal Pilot Study', ASAIO Journal, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 443-447. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000000220
Fujii, Yasuhiro ; Ferro, Giuseppe ; Kagawa, Hiroshi ; Centola, Luca ; Zhu, Liqun ; Ferrier, William T. ; Talken, Linda ; Riemer, R. Kirk ; Maeda, Katsuhide ; Nasirov, Teimour ; Hodges, Bill ; Amirriazi, Saleh ; Lee, Eric ; Sheff, Donald ; May, Judith ; May, Robert ; Reinhartz, Olaf. / Is Continuous Flow Superior to Pulsatile Flow in Single Ventricle Mechanical Support? Results from a Large Animal Pilot Study. In: ASAIO Journal. 2015 ; Vol. 61, No. 4. pp. 443-447.
@article{b166211fdb6f4d3badae92f62eb36b93,
title = "Is Continuous Flow Superior to Pulsatile Flow in Single Ventricle Mechanical Support? Results from a Large Animal Pilot Study",
abstract = "Durable mechanical support in situations of physiologic single ventricle has been met with little success so far, particularly in small children. We created an animal model to investigate whether pulsatile or continuous flow would be superior. Three 1 month old sheep (10-16 kg) were instrumented. Via sternotomy and with cardiopulmonary bypass, a large ventricular septal defect and atrial septal defect were created. The left ventricle was cannulated using a Berlin Heart inflow cannula. This was connected sequentially to a continuous flow device (Thoratec HeartMate X, Pleasanton, CA) and to a pulsatile device (Berlin Heart Excor, The Woodlands, TX). Outflow was via a Y-graft to both aorta and pulmonary artery, striving for equal flow to both. Atrial filling pressures were controlled with volume infusions over a wide range. Under comparable loading conditions, significantly higher maximum flow was obtained by HeartMate X than by Excor (4.95 ± 1.27 L/min [range, 3.84-6.34 L/min] for HeartMate X vs. 1.80 ± 0.85 L/min [range, 1.01-2.7 L/min] for Excor; p <0.05). Judging from this limited animal study, in single ventricle scenarios, continuous flow devices may achieve higher pump flows than pulsatile devices when provided with similar filling pressures. Their clinical use should be investigated. More extensive experimental studies are needed.",
keywords = "animal model, axial pump, pneumatic pulsatile pump, single ventricle, ventricular assist device",
author = "Yasuhiro Fujii and Giuseppe Ferro and Hiroshi Kagawa and Luca Centola and Liqun Zhu and Ferrier, {William T.} and Linda Talken and Riemer, {R. Kirk} and Katsuhide Maeda and Teimour Nasirov and Bill Hodges and Saleh Amirriazi and Eric Lee and Donald Sheff and Judith May and Robert May and Olaf Reinhartz",
year = "2015",
month = "7",
day = "21",
doi = "10.1097/MAT.0000000000000220",
language = "English",
volume = "61",
pages = "443--447",
journal = "ASAIO Journal",
issn = "1058-2916",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is Continuous Flow Superior to Pulsatile Flow in Single Ventricle Mechanical Support? Results from a Large Animal Pilot Study

AU - Fujii, Yasuhiro

AU - Ferro, Giuseppe

AU - Kagawa, Hiroshi

AU - Centola, Luca

AU - Zhu, Liqun

AU - Ferrier, William T.

AU - Talken, Linda

AU - Riemer, R. Kirk

AU - Maeda, Katsuhide

AU - Nasirov, Teimour

AU - Hodges, Bill

AU - Amirriazi, Saleh

AU - Lee, Eric

AU - Sheff, Donald

AU - May, Judith

AU - May, Robert

AU - Reinhartz, Olaf

PY - 2015/7/21

Y1 - 2015/7/21

N2 - Durable mechanical support in situations of physiologic single ventricle has been met with little success so far, particularly in small children. We created an animal model to investigate whether pulsatile or continuous flow would be superior. Three 1 month old sheep (10-16 kg) were instrumented. Via sternotomy and with cardiopulmonary bypass, a large ventricular septal defect and atrial septal defect were created. The left ventricle was cannulated using a Berlin Heart inflow cannula. This was connected sequentially to a continuous flow device (Thoratec HeartMate X, Pleasanton, CA) and to a pulsatile device (Berlin Heart Excor, The Woodlands, TX). Outflow was via a Y-graft to both aorta and pulmonary artery, striving for equal flow to both. Atrial filling pressures were controlled with volume infusions over a wide range. Under comparable loading conditions, significantly higher maximum flow was obtained by HeartMate X than by Excor (4.95 ± 1.27 L/min [range, 3.84-6.34 L/min] for HeartMate X vs. 1.80 ± 0.85 L/min [range, 1.01-2.7 L/min] for Excor; p <0.05). Judging from this limited animal study, in single ventricle scenarios, continuous flow devices may achieve higher pump flows than pulsatile devices when provided with similar filling pressures. Their clinical use should be investigated. More extensive experimental studies are needed.

AB - Durable mechanical support in situations of physiologic single ventricle has been met with little success so far, particularly in small children. We created an animal model to investigate whether pulsatile or continuous flow would be superior. Three 1 month old sheep (10-16 kg) were instrumented. Via sternotomy and with cardiopulmonary bypass, a large ventricular septal defect and atrial septal defect were created. The left ventricle was cannulated using a Berlin Heart inflow cannula. This was connected sequentially to a continuous flow device (Thoratec HeartMate X, Pleasanton, CA) and to a pulsatile device (Berlin Heart Excor, The Woodlands, TX). Outflow was via a Y-graft to both aorta and pulmonary artery, striving for equal flow to both. Atrial filling pressures were controlled with volume infusions over a wide range. Under comparable loading conditions, significantly higher maximum flow was obtained by HeartMate X than by Excor (4.95 ± 1.27 L/min [range, 3.84-6.34 L/min] for HeartMate X vs. 1.80 ± 0.85 L/min [range, 1.01-2.7 L/min] for Excor; p <0.05). Judging from this limited animal study, in single ventricle scenarios, continuous flow devices may achieve higher pump flows than pulsatile devices when provided with similar filling pressures. Their clinical use should be investigated. More extensive experimental studies are needed.

KW - animal model

KW - axial pump

KW - pneumatic pulsatile pump

KW - single ventricle

KW - ventricular assist device

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84937575980&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84937575980&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/MAT.0000000000000220

DO - 10.1097/MAT.0000000000000220

M3 - Article

C2 - 25794246

AN - SCOPUS:84937575980

VL - 61

SP - 443

EP - 447

JO - ASAIO Journal

JF - ASAIO Journal

SN - 1058-2916

IS - 4

ER -