TY - JOUR
T1 - Intraperitoneal carboplatin infusion may be a pharmacologically more reasonable route than intravenous administration as a systemic chemotherapy. A comparative pharmacokinetic analysis of platinum using a new mathematical model after intraperitoneal vs. intravenous infusion of carboplatin - A Sankai Gynecology Study Group (SGSG) study
AU - Miyagi, Yasunari
AU - Fujiwara, Keiichi
AU - Kigawa, Junzo
AU - Itamochi, Hiroaki
AU - Nagao, Shoji
AU - Aotani, Eriko
AU - Terakawa, Naoki
AU - Kohno, Ichiro
N1 - Funding Information:
Authors thank Ms. Hiroko Shirafuji for her excellent technical support. This study was presented at American Society of Clinical Oncology Meeting in 2004. This project was supported in part by a research grant provided by Bristol Japan.
PY - 2005/12
Y1 - 2005/12
N2 - Objective. To clarify the pharmacological advantage of carboplatin-based intraperitoneal chemotherapy using the three-compartment mathematical model. Methods. Eleven consecutive patients in one institution underwent intraperitoneal administration of carboplatin, and 11 consecutive patients in another institution received intravenous administration. Carboplatin (AUC = 6 mg × min/ml) was diluted in 500 ml 5% glucose and administered either as an intraperitoneal bolus infusion or intravenous drip infusion during 1 h. Patients undergoing intravenous injection also received an infusion of 500 ml 5% glucose to obtain intraperitoneal samples. Intraperitoneal fluid and blood samples were obtained, immediately and 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 h after administration. The mathematical model consisting of a three-compartment model was applied to analyze the pharmacokinetics. The model was created with simultaneous differential equations and was solved by the Runge-Kutta method. Results. The rate constants of platinum diffusion from the peritoneal cavity to serum, serum to peritoneal cavity, serum to peripheral space, peripheral space to serum, and elimination were 0.94 ± 0.79 (mean ± SD), 1.28 ± 2.50, 16.50 ± 9.26, 0.99 ± 0.62, and 4.14 ± 1.45 (h -1), respectively. When the theoretical pharmacological concentration of platinum was calculated using this mathematical model, 24-h platinum AUC in the serum was exactly the same regardless of intraperitoneal or intravenous administration of carboplatin. However, the 24-h platinum AUC in the peritoneal cavity was approximately 17 times higher when carboplatin was administered by the intraperitoneal route. Conclusion. The present pharmacological analysis suggests that intraperitoneal infusion of carboplatin is feasible not only as an intraperitoneal regional therapy but also as a more reasonable route for systemic chemotherapy.
AB - Objective. To clarify the pharmacological advantage of carboplatin-based intraperitoneal chemotherapy using the three-compartment mathematical model. Methods. Eleven consecutive patients in one institution underwent intraperitoneal administration of carboplatin, and 11 consecutive patients in another institution received intravenous administration. Carboplatin (AUC = 6 mg × min/ml) was diluted in 500 ml 5% glucose and administered either as an intraperitoneal bolus infusion or intravenous drip infusion during 1 h. Patients undergoing intravenous injection also received an infusion of 500 ml 5% glucose to obtain intraperitoneal samples. Intraperitoneal fluid and blood samples were obtained, immediately and 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 h after administration. The mathematical model consisting of a three-compartment model was applied to analyze the pharmacokinetics. The model was created with simultaneous differential equations and was solved by the Runge-Kutta method. Results. The rate constants of platinum diffusion from the peritoneal cavity to serum, serum to peritoneal cavity, serum to peripheral space, peripheral space to serum, and elimination were 0.94 ± 0.79 (mean ± SD), 1.28 ± 2.50, 16.50 ± 9.26, 0.99 ± 0.62, and 4.14 ± 1.45 (h -1), respectively. When the theoretical pharmacological concentration of platinum was calculated using this mathematical model, 24-h platinum AUC in the serum was exactly the same regardless of intraperitoneal or intravenous administration of carboplatin. However, the 24-h platinum AUC in the peritoneal cavity was approximately 17 times higher when carboplatin was administered by the intraperitoneal route. Conclusion. The present pharmacological analysis suggests that intraperitoneal infusion of carboplatin is feasible not only as an intraperitoneal regional therapy but also as a more reasonable route for systemic chemotherapy.
KW - Carboplatin
KW - Intraperitoneal chemotherapy
KW - Intravenous chemotherapy
KW - Mathematical model
KW - Ovarian cancer
KW - Pharmacokinetics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=28044457404&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=28044457404&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.06.055
DO - 10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.06.055
M3 - Article
C2 - 16095677
AN - SCOPUS:28044457404
SN - 0090-8258
VL - 99
SP - 591
EP - 596
JO - Gynecologic Oncology
JF - Gynecologic Oncology
IS - 3
ER -