Intralocus sexual conflict unresolved by sex-limited trait expression

Tomohiro Harano, Kensuke Okada, Satoshi Nakayama, Takahisa Miyatake, David J. Hosken

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

78 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Sexually antagonistic selection generates intralocus sexual conflict, an evolutionary tug-of-war between males and females over optimal trait values [1-4]. Although the potential for this conflict is universal, the evolutionary importance of intralocus conflict is controversial because conflicts are typically thought to be resolvable through the evolution of sex-specific trait development [1-8]. However, whether sex-specific trait expression always resolves intralocus conflict has not been established. We assessed this with beetle populations subjected to bidirectional selection on an exaggerated sexually selected trait, the mandible. Mandibles are only ever developed in males for use in male-male combat, and larger mandibles increase male fitness (fighting [9, 10] and mating success, as we show here). We find that females from populations selected for larger male mandibles have lower fitness, whereas females in small-mandible populations have highest fitness, even though females never develop exaggerated mandibles. This is because mandible development changes genetically correlated characters, resulting in a negative intersexual fitness correlation across these populations, which is the unmistakable signature of intralocus sexual conflict [1]. Our results show that sex-limited trait development need not resolve intralocus sexual conflict, because traits are rarely, if ever, genetically independent of other characters [11]. Hence, intralocus conflict resolution is not as easy as currently thought.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2036-2039
Number of pages4
JournalCurrent Biology
Volume20
Issue number22
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 23 2010

Fingerprint

Mandible
gender
Population
conflict management
Beetles
Negotiating
Conflict (Psychology)
Coleoptera

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)

Cite this

Intralocus sexual conflict unresolved by sex-limited trait expression. / Harano, Tomohiro; Okada, Kensuke; Nakayama, Satoshi; Miyatake, Takahisa; Hosken, David J.

In: Current Biology, Vol. 20, No. 22, 23.11.2010, p. 2036-2039.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Harano, Tomohiro ; Okada, Kensuke ; Nakayama, Satoshi ; Miyatake, Takahisa ; Hosken, David J. / Intralocus sexual conflict unresolved by sex-limited trait expression. In: Current Biology. 2010 ; Vol. 20, No. 22. pp. 2036-2039.
@article{bbd92d6d02424135a9c5833cc634a461,
title = "Intralocus sexual conflict unresolved by sex-limited trait expression",
abstract = "Sexually antagonistic selection generates intralocus sexual conflict, an evolutionary tug-of-war between males and females over optimal trait values [1-4]. Although the potential for this conflict is universal, the evolutionary importance of intralocus conflict is controversial because conflicts are typically thought to be resolvable through the evolution of sex-specific trait development [1-8]. However, whether sex-specific trait expression always resolves intralocus conflict has not been established. We assessed this with beetle populations subjected to bidirectional selection on an exaggerated sexually selected trait, the mandible. Mandibles are only ever developed in males for use in male-male combat, and larger mandibles increase male fitness (fighting [9, 10] and mating success, as we show here). We find that females from populations selected for larger male mandibles have lower fitness, whereas females in small-mandible populations have highest fitness, even though females never develop exaggerated mandibles. This is because mandible development changes genetically correlated characters, resulting in a negative intersexual fitness correlation across these populations, which is the unmistakable signature of intralocus sexual conflict [1]. Our results show that sex-limited trait development need not resolve intralocus sexual conflict, because traits are rarely, if ever, genetically independent of other characters [11]. Hence, intralocus conflict resolution is not as easy as currently thought.",
author = "Tomohiro Harano and Kensuke Okada and Satoshi Nakayama and Takahisa Miyatake and Hosken, {David J.}",
year = "2010",
month = "11",
day = "23",
doi = "10.1016/j.cub.2010.10.023",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "2036--2039",
journal = "Current Biology",
issn = "0960-9822",
publisher = "Cell Press",
number = "22",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Intralocus sexual conflict unresolved by sex-limited trait expression

AU - Harano, Tomohiro

AU - Okada, Kensuke

AU - Nakayama, Satoshi

AU - Miyatake, Takahisa

AU - Hosken, David J.

PY - 2010/11/23

Y1 - 2010/11/23

N2 - Sexually antagonistic selection generates intralocus sexual conflict, an evolutionary tug-of-war between males and females over optimal trait values [1-4]. Although the potential for this conflict is universal, the evolutionary importance of intralocus conflict is controversial because conflicts are typically thought to be resolvable through the evolution of sex-specific trait development [1-8]. However, whether sex-specific trait expression always resolves intralocus conflict has not been established. We assessed this with beetle populations subjected to bidirectional selection on an exaggerated sexually selected trait, the mandible. Mandibles are only ever developed in males for use in male-male combat, and larger mandibles increase male fitness (fighting [9, 10] and mating success, as we show here). We find that females from populations selected for larger male mandibles have lower fitness, whereas females in small-mandible populations have highest fitness, even though females never develop exaggerated mandibles. This is because mandible development changes genetically correlated characters, resulting in a negative intersexual fitness correlation across these populations, which is the unmistakable signature of intralocus sexual conflict [1]. Our results show that sex-limited trait development need not resolve intralocus sexual conflict, because traits are rarely, if ever, genetically independent of other characters [11]. Hence, intralocus conflict resolution is not as easy as currently thought.

AB - Sexually antagonistic selection generates intralocus sexual conflict, an evolutionary tug-of-war between males and females over optimal trait values [1-4]. Although the potential for this conflict is universal, the evolutionary importance of intralocus conflict is controversial because conflicts are typically thought to be resolvable through the evolution of sex-specific trait development [1-8]. However, whether sex-specific trait expression always resolves intralocus conflict has not been established. We assessed this with beetle populations subjected to bidirectional selection on an exaggerated sexually selected trait, the mandible. Mandibles are only ever developed in males for use in male-male combat, and larger mandibles increase male fitness (fighting [9, 10] and mating success, as we show here). We find that females from populations selected for larger male mandibles have lower fitness, whereas females in small-mandible populations have highest fitness, even though females never develop exaggerated mandibles. This is because mandible development changes genetically correlated characters, resulting in a negative intersexual fitness correlation across these populations, which is the unmistakable signature of intralocus sexual conflict [1]. Our results show that sex-limited trait development need not resolve intralocus sexual conflict, because traits are rarely, if ever, genetically independent of other characters [11]. Hence, intralocus conflict resolution is not as easy as currently thought.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78649296383&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78649296383&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.cub.2010.10.023

DO - 10.1016/j.cub.2010.10.023

M3 - Article

C2 - 21055943

AN - SCOPUS:78649296383

VL - 20

SP - 2036

EP - 2039

JO - Current Biology

JF - Current Biology

SN - 0960-9822

IS - 22

ER -