Intergender differences in histological architecture of the fascia pelvis parietalis: A cadaveric study

Eiji Hirata, Hisaya Fujiwara, Shogo Hayashi, Aiji Ohtsuka, Shin Ichi Abe, Gen Murakami, Yoshiki Kudo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The fascia pelvis parietalis (FPP) or endopelvic fascia is a well-known structure, but few studies described the detailed histological architecture, including the composite fiber directions. We hypothesized a gender-specific fiber architecture corresponding to the functional demand. For the first step to examine this hypothesis, we investigated specimens from 27 adult cadavers (10 males and 17 females) and 11 midterm fetuses (five males and six females) using immunohistochemistry and aldehyde-fuchsin staining. The adult female FPP was a solid, thick monolayered structure that was reinforced by abundant elastic fibers running across the striated muscle fibers, but it contained little or no smooth muscles (SM). In contrast, the male FPP was multilayered with abundant SM. In midterm fetuses, SM originated from the inferior part of the bladder and extended inferiorly along the gender-specific courses. Thus, we found a clear intergender difference in FPP architecture. However, the functional significance remained unknown because the basic architecture was common between nulliparous and multiparous women. Rather than for meeting the likely mechanical demands of pregnancy and vaginal delivery, the intergender difference of the FPP seemed to result from differences in the amount and migration course of bladder-derived SM as well as in hormonal background.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)469-477
Number of pages9
JournalClinical Anatomy
Volume24
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2011

Fingerprint

Fascia
Pelvis
Smooth Muscle
Urinary Bladder
Fetus
Rosaniline Dyes
Elastic Tissue
Striated Muscle
Cadaver
Aldehydes
Immunohistochemistry
Staining and Labeling
Pregnancy

Keywords

  • elastic fibers
  • endopelvic fascia
  • fascia pelvis parietalis
  • fetus
  • smooth muscle

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anatomy
  • Histology

Cite this

Intergender differences in histological architecture of the fascia pelvis parietalis : A cadaveric study. / Hirata, Eiji; Fujiwara, Hisaya; Hayashi, Shogo; Ohtsuka, Aiji; Abe, Shin Ichi; Murakami, Gen; Kudo, Yoshiki.

In: Clinical Anatomy, Vol. 24, No. 4, 05.2011, p. 469-477.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hirata, Eiji ; Fujiwara, Hisaya ; Hayashi, Shogo ; Ohtsuka, Aiji ; Abe, Shin Ichi ; Murakami, Gen ; Kudo, Yoshiki. / Intergender differences in histological architecture of the fascia pelvis parietalis : A cadaveric study. In: Clinical Anatomy. 2011 ; Vol. 24, No. 4. pp. 469-477.
@article{cb2aa588381340c9963053163fc496e8,
title = "Intergender differences in histological architecture of the fascia pelvis parietalis: A cadaveric study",
abstract = "The fascia pelvis parietalis (FPP) or endopelvic fascia is a well-known structure, but few studies described the detailed histological architecture, including the composite fiber directions. We hypothesized a gender-specific fiber architecture corresponding to the functional demand. For the first step to examine this hypothesis, we investigated specimens from 27 adult cadavers (10 males and 17 females) and 11 midterm fetuses (five males and six females) using immunohistochemistry and aldehyde-fuchsin staining. The adult female FPP was a solid, thick monolayered structure that was reinforced by abundant elastic fibers running across the striated muscle fibers, but it contained little or no smooth muscles (SM). In contrast, the male FPP was multilayered with abundant SM. In midterm fetuses, SM originated from the inferior part of the bladder and extended inferiorly along the gender-specific courses. Thus, we found a clear intergender difference in FPP architecture. However, the functional significance remained unknown because the basic architecture was common between nulliparous and multiparous women. Rather than for meeting the likely mechanical demands of pregnancy and vaginal delivery, the intergender difference of the FPP seemed to result from differences in the amount and migration course of bladder-derived SM as well as in hormonal background.",
keywords = "elastic fibers, endopelvic fascia, fascia pelvis parietalis, fetus, smooth muscle",
author = "Eiji Hirata and Hisaya Fujiwara and Shogo Hayashi and Aiji Ohtsuka and Abe, {Shin Ichi} and Gen Murakami and Yoshiki Kudo",
year = "2011",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1002/ca.21042",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "469--477",
journal = "Clinical Anatomy",
issn = "0897-3806",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Intergender differences in histological architecture of the fascia pelvis parietalis

T2 - A cadaveric study

AU - Hirata, Eiji

AU - Fujiwara, Hisaya

AU - Hayashi, Shogo

AU - Ohtsuka, Aiji

AU - Abe, Shin Ichi

AU - Murakami, Gen

AU - Kudo, Yoshiki

PY - 2011/5

Y1 - 2011/5

N2 - The fascia pelvis parietalis (FPP) or endopelvic fascia is a well-known structure, but few studies described the detailed histological architecture, including the composite fiber directions. We hypothesized a gender-specific fiber architecture corresponding to the functional demand. For the first step to examine this hypothesis, we investigated specimens from 27 adult cadavers (10 males and 17 females) and 11 midterm fetuses (five males and six females) using immunohistochemistry and aldehyde-fuchsin staining. The adult female FPP was a solid, thick monolayered structure that was reinforced by abundant elastic fibers running across the striated muscle fibers, but it contained little or no smooth muscles (SM). In contrast, the male FPP was multilayered with abundant SM. In midterm fetuses, SM originated from the inferior part of the bladder and extended inferiorly along the gender-specific courses. Thus, we found a clear intergender difference in FPP architecture. However, the functional significance remained unknown because the basic architecture was common between nulliparous and multiparous women. Rather than for meeting the likely mechanical demands of pregnancy and vaginal delivery, the intergender difference of the FPP seemed to result from differences in the amount and migration course of bladder-derived SM as well as in hormonal background.

AB - The fascia pelvis parietalis (FPP) or endopelvic fascia is a well-known structure, but few studies described the detailed histological architecture, including the composite fiber directions. We hypothesized a gender-specific fiber architecture corresponding to the functional demand. For the first step to examine this hypothesis, we investigated specimens from 27 adult cadavers (10 males and 17 females) and 11 midterm fetuses (five males and six females) using immunohistochemistry and aldehyde-fuchsin staining. The adult female FPP was a solid, thick monolayered structure that was reinforced by abundant elastic fibers running across the striated muscle fibers, but it contained little or no smooth muscles (SM). In contrast, the male FPP was multilayered with abundant SM. In midterm fetuses, SM originated from the inferior part of the bladder and extended inferiorly along the gender-specific courses. Thus, we found a clear intergender difference in FPP architecture. However, the functional significance remained unknown because the basic architecture was common between nulliparous and multiparous women. Rather than for meeting the likely mechanical demands of pregnancy and vaginal delivery, the intergender difference of the FPP seemed to result from differences in the amount and migration course of bladder-derived SM as well as in hormonal background.

KW - elastic fibers

KW - endopelvic fascia

KW - fascia pelvis parietalis

KW - fetus

KW - smooth muscle

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79955395124&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79955395124&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/ca.21042

DO - 10.1002/ca.21042

M3 - Article

C2 - 20830792

AN - SCOPUS:79955395124

VL - 24

SP - 469

EP - 477

JO - Clinical Anatomy

JF - Clinical Anatomy

SN - 0897-3806

IS - 4

ER -