Abstract
The indirect involvement in the unethical behavior represented by violation of regulation is believed to lessen the responsibility for the accident occurred due to the unethical behavior as compared to the direct involvement in the unethical behavior. It has been explored how punishment changes when violation of rule or defection is committed indirectly in decision making. It was hypothesized that we tend to be insensitive to violation, defection, or unethical behavior in decision making when it was indirectly intermediated. In other words, we explored whether allowing indirect actions leads to increased uncooperative decision in decision making. These results mean that the punishment to the indirectness does not always get smaller. The punishment to the indirectness gets smaller only when the reward by Players B and D are larger. In conclusion, the hypothesis that the indirect intermediation reduces the punishment and thus lessons the responsibility for the unethical violation behavior is true for the limited condition.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 3883-3890 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Procedia Manufacturing |
| Volume | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2015 |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- Decision making
- Intermediation
- Punishment and fairness
- Safety management
- Unethical behavior
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Artificial Intelligence
- Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
Cite this
Insensitivity to Unethical Behavior in Decision Making when Indirectly Intermediated. / Murata, Atsuo; Matsushita, Yasunari; Moriwaka, Makoto.
In: Procedia Manufacturing, Vol. 3, 2015, p. 3883-3890.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Insensitivity to Unethical Behavior in Decision Making when Indirectly Intermediated
AU - Murata, Atsuo
AU - Matsushita, Yasunari
AU - Moriwaka, Makoto
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - The indirect involvement in the unethical behavior represented by violation of regulation is believed to lessen the responsibility for the accident occurred due to the unethical behavior as compared to the direct involvement in the unethical behavior. It has been explored how punishment changes when violation of rule or defection is committed indirectly in decision making. It was hypothesized that we tend to be insensitive to violation, defection, or unethical behavior in decision making when it was indirectly intermediated. In other words, we explored whether allowing indirect actions leads to increased uncooperative decision in decision making. These results mean that the punishment to the indirectness does not always get smaller. The punishment to the indirectness gets smaller only when the reward by Players B and D are larger. In conclusion, the hypothesis that the indirect intermediation reduces the punishment and thus lessons the responsibility for the unethical violation behavior is true for the limited condition.
AB - The indirect involvement in the unethical behavior represented by violation of regulation is believed to lessen the responsibility for the accident occurred due to the unethical behavior as compared to the direct involvement in the unethical behavior. It has been explored how punishment changes when violation of rule or defection is committed indirectly in decision making. It was hypothesized that we tend to be insensitive to violation, defection, or unethical behavior in decision making when it was indirectly intermediated. In other words, we explored whether allowing indirect actions leads to increased uncooperative decision in decision making. These results mean that the punishment to the indirectness does not always get smaller. The punishment to the indirectness gets smaller only when the reward by Players B and D are larger. In conclusion, the hypothesis that the indirect intermediation reduces the punishment and thus lessons the responsibility for the unethical violation behavior is true for the limited condition.
KW - Decision making
KW - Intermediation
KW - Punishment and fairness
KW - Safety management
KW - Unethical behavior
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85009944208&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85009944208&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.900
DO - 10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.900
M3 - Article
VL - 3
SP - 3883
EP - 3890
JO - Procedia Manufacturing
JF - Procedia Manufacturing
SN - 2351-9789
ER -