TY - JOUR
T1 - Influence of distant scatterer on air kerma measurement in the evaluation of diagnostic X-rays using Monte Carlo simulation
AU - Tominaga, Masahide
AU - Nagayasu, Yukari
AU - Sasaki, Motoharu
AU - Furuta, Takuya
AU - Hayashi, Hiroaki
AU - Oita, Masataka
AU - Nishiyama, Yuichi
AU - Haga, Akihiro
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, Japanese Society of Radiological Technology and Japan Society of Medical Physics.
PY - 2021/12
Y1 - 2021/12
N2 - The evaluation of the entrance surface dose (ESD) ensures safe radiation doses for X-ray imaging patients. The air kerma free-in-air value used to estimate ESD may be affected by those X-rays that scatter from the scatterer placed behind the chamber at the time of measurement, thereby leading to assessment errors. Therefore, the influence of scattered radiation on air kerma measurements was investigated. Monte Carlo simulations were performed for various detector-to-scatterer distances and scatterer materials. The simulation results were compared with actual measurements to confirm the simulation accuracy. The source–chamber distance was set to 50 and 100 cm for the experimental measurements and simulation, respectively, and the chamber–scatterer distance was varied. The Monte Carlo simulation results reproduced the actual measurements with an accuracy of 3.5%. The effect of backscattering varied with the tube voltage and irradiation field size. The effect was observed in the order of prominence for the following scatterer materials: water-equivalent phantom, acrylic, concrete, lead, and iron. Furthermore, this effect decreased exponentially with increasing chamber–scatterer distance. For a field size of 10 × 10 cm2, the finite-distance backscatter factor decreased with an increasing chamber–scatterer distance for all materials. The cause of backscattering in diagnostic X-ray energy regions differs depending on the scatterer material, as well as the photon energy and field size. Backscattering decreases exponentially as the distance between the detector and scatterer increases.
AB - The evaluation of the entrance surface dose (ESD) ensures safe radiation doses for X-ray imaging patients. The air kerma free-in-air value used to estimate ESD may be affected by those X-rays that scatter from the scatterer placed behind the chamber at the time of measurement, thereby leading to assessment errors. Therefore, the influence of scattered radiation on air kerma measurements was investigated. Monte Carlo simulations were performed for various detector-to-scatterer distances and scatterer materials. The simulation results were compared with actual measurements to confirm the simulation accuracy. The source–chamber distance was set to 50 and 100 cm for the experimental measurements and simulation, respectively, and the chamber–scatterer distance was varied. The Monte Carlo simulation results reproduced the actual measurements with an accuracy of 3.5%. The effect of backscattering varied with the tube voltage and irradiation field size. The effect was observed in the order of prominence for the following scatterer materials: water-equivalent phantom, acrylic, concrete, lead, and iron. Furthermore, this effect decreased exponentially with increasing chamber–scatterer distance. For a field size of 10 × 10 cm2, the finite-distance backscatter factor decreased with an increasing chamber–scatterer distance for all materials. The cause of backscattering in diagnostic X-ray energy regions differs depending on the scatterer material, as well as the photon energy and field size. Backscattering decreases exponentially as the distance between the detector and scatterer increases.
KW - Air kerma
KW - Backscattering
KW - Dosimetry
KW - Monte Carlo simulation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85118361541&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85118361541&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s12194-021-00641-3
DO - 10.1007/s12194-021-00641-3
M3 - Article
C2 - 34716568
AN - SCOPUS:85118361541
SN - 1865-0333
VL - 14
SP - 381
EP - 389
JO - Radiological Physics and Technology
JF - Radiological Physics and Technology
IS - 4
ER -