Indications for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Pancreatic Drainage

For Benign or Malignant Cases?

Daisuke Uchida, Hironari Katou, Yosuke Saragai, Saimon Takada, Sho Mizukawa, Shinichiro Muro, Yutaka Akimoto, Takeshi Tomoda, Kazuyuki Matsumoto, Shigeru Horiguchi, Hiroyuki Okada

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and Aims. Recurrent pancreatitis associated with pancreatic strictures requires treatment with endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERP), but it is sometimes technically unsuccessful. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic drainage (EUS-PD) was developed as an alternative to a surgical approach after failed ERP; however, the indications for EUS-PD are unclear. In this study, we evaluated the outcomes of EUS-PD and established the indications for EUS-PD. Methods. A total of 15 patients had indications for EUS-PD for recurrent pancreatitis due to pancreatic strictures. There were eight patients with benign pancreatic strictures and seven with malignant pancreatic strictures. The success rate, adverse events, and long-term outcomes were evaluated. Results. The technical success rates of benign and malignant strictures were 75% (6/8) and 100% (7/7), respectively, and clinical success was achieved in 100% (6/6) and 87.5% of cases (6/7), respectively. Rendezvous procedures were performed in two patients with benign strictures. The adverse event (AE) rate was 26.7% (4/15) and included cases of peritonitis, bleeding, and stent migration. Reinterventions were performed in three patients with benign strictures and two with malignant strictures. Conclusions. EUS-PD was an appropriate treatment for not only benign strictures but also malignant strictures with recurrent pancreatitis after failed ERP. However, the AE rate was high, and reinterventions were required in some cases during long-term follow-up. The indications for EUS-PD should be considered carefully, and careful follow-up is needed.

Original languageEnglish
Article number8216109
JournalCanadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Volume2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Drainage
Pathologic Constriction
Pancreatitis
Peritonitis
Stents
Hemorrhage
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hepatology
  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Indications for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Pancreatic Drainage : For Benign or Malignant Cases? / Uchida, Daisuke; Katou, Hironari; Saragai, Yosuke; Takada, Saimon; Mizukawa, Sho; Muro, Shinichiro; Akimoto, Yutaka; Tomoda, Takeshi; Matsumoto, Kazuyuki; Horiguchi, Shigeru; Okada, Hiroyuki.

In: Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Vol. 2018, 8216109, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{bf411eb5bed24b40915b301fec2a5bf3,
title = "Indications for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Pancreatic Drainage: For Benign or Malignant Cases?",
abstract = "Background and Aims. Recurrent pancreatitis associated with pancreatic strictures requires treatment with endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERP), but it is sometimes technically unsuccessful. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic drainage (EUS-PD) was developed as an alternative to a surgical approach after failed ERP; however, the indications for EUS-PD are unclear. In this study, we evaluated the outcomes of EUS-PD and established the indications for EUS-PD. Methods. A total of 15 patients had indications for EUS-PD for recurrent pancreatitis due to pancreatic strictures. There were eight patients with benign pancreatic strictures and seven with malignant pancreatic strictures. The success rate, adverse events, and long-term outcomes were evaluated. Results. The technical success rates of benign and malignant strictures were 75{\%} (6/8) and 100{\%} (7/7), respectively, and clinical success was achieved in 100{\%} (6/6) and 87.5{\%} of cases (6/7), respectively. Rendezvous procedures were performed in two patients with benign strictures. The adverse event (AE) rate was 26.7{\%} (4/15) and included cases of peritonitis, bleeding, and stent migration. Reinterventions were performed in three patients with benign strictures and two with malignant strictures. Conclusions. EUS-PD was an appropriate treatment for not only benign strictures but also malignant strictures with recurrent pancreatitis after failed ERP. However, the AE rate was high, and reinterventions were required in some cases during long-term follow-up. The indications for EUS-PD should be considered carefully, and careful follow-up is needed.",
author = "Daisuke Uchida and Hironari Katou and Yosuke Saragai and Saimon Takada and Sho Mizukawa and Shinichiro Muro and Yutaka Akimoto and Takeshi Tomoda and Kazuyuki Matsumoto and Shigeru Horiguchi and Hiroyuki Okada",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1155/2018/8216109",
language = "English",
volume = "2018",
journal = "Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology",
issn = "2291-2789",
publisher = "Pulsus Group Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Indications for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Pancreatic Drainage

T2 - For Benign or Malignant Cases?

AU - Uchida, Daisuke

AU - Katou, Hironari

AU - Saragai, Yosuke

AU - Takada, Saimon

AU - Mizukawa, Sho

AU - Muro, Shinichiro

AU - Akimoto, Yutaka

AU - Tomoda, Takeshi

AU - Matsumoto, Kazuyuki

AU - Horiguchi, Shigeru

AU - Okada, Hiroyuki

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Background and Aims. Recurrent pancreatitis associated with pancreatic strictures requires treatment with endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERP), but it is sometimes technically unsuccessful. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic drainage (EUS-PD) was developed as an alternative to a surgical approach after failed ERP; however, the indications for EUS-PD are unclear. In this study, we evaluated the outcomes of EUS-PD and established the indications for EUS-PD. Methods. A total of 15 patients had indications for EUS-PD for recurrent pancreatitis due to pancreatic strictures. There were eight patients with benign pancreatic strictures and seven with malignant pancreatic strictures. The success rate, adverse events, and long-term outcomes were evaluated. Results. The technical success rates of benign and malignant strictures were 75% (6/8) and 100% (7/7), respectively, and clinical success was achieved in 100% (6/6) and 87.5% of cases (6/7), respectively. Rendezvous procedures were performed in two patients with benign strictures. The adverse event (AE) rate was 26.7% (4/15) and included cases of peritonitis, bleeding, and stent migration. Reinterventions were performed in three patients with benign strictures and two with malignant strictures. Conclusions. EUS-PD was an appropriate treatment for not only benign strictures but also malignant strictures with recurrent pancreatitis after failed ERP. However, the AE rate was high, and reinterventions were required in some cases during long-term follow-up. The indications for EUS-PD should be considered carefully, and careful follow-up is needed.

AB - Background and Aims. Recurrent pancreatitis associated with pancreatic strictures requires treatment with endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERP), but it is sometimes technically unsuccessful. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic drainage (EUS-PD) was developed as an alternative to a surgical approach after failed ERP; however, the indications for EUS-PD are unclear. In this study, we evaluated the outcomes of EUS-PD and established the indications for EUS-PD. Methods. A total of 15 patients had indications for EUS-PD for recurrent pancreatitis due to pancreatic strictures. There were eight patients with benign pancreatic strictures and seven with malignant pancreatic strictures. The success rate, adverse events, and long-term outcomes were evaluated. Results. The technical success rates of benign and malignant strictures were 75% (6/8) and 100% (7/7), respectively, and clinical success was achieved in 100% (6/6) and 87.5% of cases (6/7), respectively. Rendezvous procedures were performed in two patients with benign strictures. The adverse event (AE) rate was 26.7% (4/15) and included cases of peritonitis, bleeding, and stent migration. Reinterventions were performed in three patients with benign strictures and two with malignant strictures. Conclusions. EUS-PD was an appropriate treatment for not only benign strictures but also malignant strictures with recurrent pancreatitis after failed ERP. However, the AE rate was high, and reinterventions were required in some cases during long-term follow-up. The indications for EUS-PD should be considered carefully, and careful follow-up is needed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049050979&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049050979&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1155/2018/8216109

DO - 10.1155/2018/8216109

M3 - Article

VL - 2018

JO - Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology

JF - Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology

SN - 2291-2789

M1 - 8216109

ER -