Implant failure of titanium versus cobalt-chromium growing rods in early-onset scoliosis

Kensuke Shinohara, Tomoyuki Takigawa, Masato Tanaka, Yoshihisa Sugimoto, Shinya Arataki, Kentaro Yamane, Noriyuki Watanabe, Toshihumi Ozaki, Takaaki Sarai

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Study Design. Retrospective case series of one institute database. Objective. To investigate the differences in the metallic strength of rods used for implant failure in the dual growing rod technique and evaluate clinical outcomes. Summary of Background Data. The dual growing rod technique in which implanted rods extend with the growth of the spine is a useful treatment for early onset scoliosis. However, many complications, particularly those associated with rods, exist. Especially, the implant failure of growing rod focused on metallic strength is unknown. Methods. Thirteen patients (42 lengthening surgeries) who underwent surgery by this technique at our hospital from 2007 were divided into a titanium rod plus titanium connector group (T group, n=4, 26 lengthening surgeries) and cobalt-chromium rod plus titanium connection group (C group, n=9, 16 lengthening surgeries). The incidence of implant failure and the site of fracture were retrospectively investigated. Results. Implant failure occurred in three patients in the T group, because of rod fracture in two patients and connector fracture in one. In the C group, implant failure occurred in six patients, because of rod fracture in one patient and connector fracture in seven. Fracture occurred twice in two patients. The rod fracture rate decreased with the use of cobalt-chromium rods but the rate of connector fracture increased. We performed a stress distribution analysis using the finite element method to clarify the mechanisms underlying implant failure in both groups. Regardless of the rod type, the greater load was placed on the distal rod. However, differences in the metallic strength caused the rod to fracture when titanium rods were used and connectors (weak metallic strength) to fracture when cobalt-chromium rods were used. Conclusion. Rod fractures occurred more commonly with titanium rods and connector fractures with cobalt-chromium rods.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)502-507
Number of pages6
JournalSpine
Volume41
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 4 2016

Fingerprint

Scoliosis
Chromium
Cobalt
Titanium
Finite Element Analysis
Spine
Databases
Incidence
Growth

Keywords

  • Early onset scoliosis
  • Growing rod
  • Implant failure
  • Metallic strength

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Shinohara, K., Takigawa, T., Tanaka, M., Sugimoto, Y., Arataki, S., Yamane, K., ... Sarai, T. (2016). Implant failure of titanium versus cobalt-chromium growing rods in early-onset scoliosis. Spine, 41(6), 502-507. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001267

Implant failure of titanium versus cobalt-chromium growing rods in early-onset scoliosis. / Shinohara, Kensuke; Takigawa, Tomoyuki; Tanaka, Masato; Sugimoto, Yoshihisa; Arataki, Shinya; Yamane, Kentaro; Watanabe, Noriyuki; Ozaki, Toshihumi; Sarai, Takaaki.

In: Spine, Vol. 41, No. 6, 04.03.2016, p. 502-507.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Shinohara, K, Takigawa, T, Tanaka, M, Sugimoto, Y, Arataki, S, Yamane, K, Watanabe, N, Ozaki, T & Sarai, T 2016, 'Implant failure of titanium versus cobalt-chromium growing rods in early-onset scoliosis', Spine, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 502-507. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001267
Shinohara, Kensuke ; Takigawa, Tomoyuki ; Tanaka, Masato ; Sugimoto, Yoshihisa ; Arataki, Shinya ; Yamane, Kentaro ; Watanabe, Noriyuki ; Ozaki, Toshihumi ; Sarai, Takaaki. / Implant failure of titanium versus cobalt-chromium growing rods in early-onset scoliosis. In: Spine. 2016 ; Vol. 41, No. 6. pp. 502-507.
@article{32d49ed0a2664768a06737bacec19acc,
title = "Implant failure of titanium versus cobalt-chromium growing rods in early-onset scoliosis",
abstract = "Study Design. Retrospective case series of one institute database. Objective. To investigate the differences in the metallic strength of rods used for implant failure in the dual growing rod technique and evaluate clinical outcomes. Summary of Background Data. The dual growing rod technique in which implanted rods extend with the growth of the spine is a useful treatment for early onset scoliosis. However, many complications, particularly those associated with rods, exist. Especially, the implant failure of growing rod focused on metallic strength is unknown. Methods. Thirteen patients (42 lengthening surgeries) who underwent surgery by this technique at our hospital from 2007 were divided into a titanium rod plus titanium connector group (T group, n=4, 26 lengthening surgeries) and cobalt-chromium rod plus titanium connection group (C group, n=9, 16 lengthening surgeries). The incidence of implant failure and the site of fracture were retrospectively investigated. Results. Implant failure occurred in three patients in the T group, because of rod fracture in two patients and connector fracture in one. In the C group, implant failure occurred in six patients, because of rod fracture in one patient and connector fracture in seven. Fracture occurred twice in two patients. The rod fracture rate decreased with the use of cobalt-chromium rods but the rate of connector fracture increased. We performed a stress distribution analysis using the finite element method to clarify the mechanisms underlying implant failure in both groups. Regardless of the rod type, the greater load was placed on the distal rod. However, differences in the metallic strength caused the rod to fracture when titanium rods were used and connectors (weak metallic strength) to fracture when cobalt-chromium rods were used. Conclusion. Rod fractures occurred more commonly with titanium rods and connector fractures with cobalt-chromium rods.",
keywords = "Early onset scoliosis, Growing rod, Implant failure, Metallic strength",
author = "Kensuke Shinohara and Tomoyuki Takigawa and Masato Tanaka and Yoshihisa Sugimoto and Shinya Arataki and Kentaro Yamane and Noriyuki Watanabe and Toshihumi Ozaki and Takaaki Sarai",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1097/BRS.0000000000001267",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "502--507",
journal = "Spine",
issn = "0362-2436",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Implant failure of titanium versus cobalt-chromium growing rods in early-onset scoliosis

AU - Shinohara, Kensuke

AU - Takigawa, Tomoyuki

AU - Tanaka, Masato

AU - Sugimoto, Yoshihisa

AU - Arataki, Shinya

AU - Yamane, Kentaro

AU - Watanabe, Noriyuki

AU - Ozaki, Toshihumi

AU - Sarai, Takaaki

PY - 2016/3/4

Y1 - 2016/3/4

N2 - Study Design. Retrospective case series of one institute database. Objective. To investigate the differences in the metallic strength of rods used for implant failure in the dual growing rod technique and evaluate clinical outcomes. Summary of Background Data. The dual growing rod technique in which implanted rods extend with the growth of the spine is a useful treatment for early onset scoliosis. However, many complications, particularly those associated with rods, exist. Especially, the implant failure of growing rod focused on metallic strength is unknown. Methods. Thirteen patients (42 lengthening surgeries) who underwent surgery by this technique at our hospital from 2007 were divided into a titanium rod plus titanium connector group (T group, n=4, 26 lengthening surgeries) and cobalt-chromium rod plus titanium connection group (C group, n=9, 16 lengthening surgeries). The incidence of implant failure and the site of fracture were retrospectively investigated. Results. Implant failure occurred in three patients in the T group, because of rod fracture in two patients and connector fracture in one. In the C group, implant failure occurred in six patients, because of rod fracture in one patient and connector fracture in seven. Fracture occurred twice in two patients. The rod fracture rate decreased with the use of cobalt-chromium rods but the rate of connector fracture increased. We performed a stress distribution analysis using the finite element method to clarify the mechanisms underlying implant failure in both groups. Regardless of the rod type, the greater load was placed on the distal rod. However, differences in the metallic strength caused the rod to fracture when titanium rods were used and connectors (weak metallic strength) to fracture when cobalt-chromium rods were used. Conclusion. Rod fractures occurred more commonly with titanium rods and connector fractures with cobalt-chromium rods.

AB - Study Design. Retrospective case series of one institute database. Objective. To investigate the differences in the metallic strength of rods used for implant failure in the dual growing rod technique and evaluate clinical outcomes. Summary of Background Data. The dual growing rod technique in which implanted rods extend with the growth of the spine is a useful treatment for early onset scoliosis. However, many complications, particularly those associated with rods, exist. Especially, the implant failure of growing rod focused on metallic strength is unknown. Methods. Thirteen patients (42 lengthening surgeries) who underwent surgery by this technique at our hospital from 2007 were divided into a titanium rod plus titanium connector group (T group, n=4, 26 lengthening surgeries) and cobalt-chromium rod plus titanium connection group (C group, n=9, 16 lengthening surgeries). The incidence of implant failure and the site of fracture were retrospectively investigated. Results. Implant failure occurred in three patients in the T group, because of rod fracture in two patients and connector fracture in one. In the C group, implant failure occurred in six patients, because of rod fracture in one patient and connector fracture in seven. Fracture occurred twice in two patients. The rod fracture rate decreased with the use of cobalt-chromium rods but the rate of connector fracture increased. We performed a stress distribution analysis using the finite element method to clarify the mechanisms underlying implant failure in both groups. Regardless of the rod type, the greater load was placed on the distal rod. However, differences in the metallic strength caused the rod to fracture when titanium rods were used and connectors (weak metallic strength) to fracture when cobalt-chromium rods were used. Conclusion. Rod fractures occurred more commonly with titanium rods and connector fractures with cobalt-chromium rods.

KW - Early onset scoliosis

KW - Growing rod

KW - Implant failure

KW - Metallic strength

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84962611101&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84962611101&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001267

DO - 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001267

M3 - Article

VL - 41

SP - 502

EP - 507

JO - Spine

JF - Spine

SN - 0362-2436

IS - 6

ER -