TY - JOUR
T1 - Icodextrin Versus Glucose Solutions for the Once-Daily Long Dwell in Peritoneal Dialysis
T2 - An Enriched Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
AU - Goossen, Käthe
AU - Becker, Monika
AU - Marshall, Mark R.
AU - Bühn, Stefanie
AU - Breuing, Jessica
AU - Firanek, Catherine A.
AU - Hess, Simone
AU - Nariai, Hisanori
AU - Sloand, James A.
AU - Yao, Qiang
AU - Chang, Tae Ik
AU - Chen, Jin Bor
AU - Paniagua, Ramón
AU - Takatori, Yuji
AU - Wada, Jun
AU - Pieper, Dawid
N1 - Funding Information:
K?the Goossen, PhD, Monika Becker, MSc, Mark R. Marshall, MPH (Hons), Stefanie B?hn, MPH, Jessica Breuing, MSc, Catherine A. Firanek, MBA, Simone Hess, MTA, Hisanori Nariai, BSc, James A. Sloand, MD, Qiang Yao, PhD, Tae Ik Chang, PhD, JinBor Chen, MD, Ram?n Paniagua, PhD, Yuji Takatori, MD, Jun Wada, PhD, and Dawid Pieper, PhD. Idea for the review: MRM; developed the protocol: MB, MRM, DP, KG; searched for studies: MB, SB, JB, CAF, SH, HN, JAS, QY; assessed articles for eligibility: MB, JB; extracted the data: KG, MB; provided additional study data: TIC, JBC, RP, YT, JW; assessed risk of bias: KG, MB; conducted the meta-analysis: KG; cross-checked the meta-analysis: MRM, MB; performed GRADE assessment of the results: KG, MB; validated the results: TIC, JBC, RP, YT, JW; supervised the process: DP. Each author contributed important intellectual content during manuscript drafting or revision and accepts accountability for the overall work by ensuring that questions pertaining to the accuracy or integrity of any portion of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. This study was funded by Baxter Healthcare International. Employees of the funding body co-authored the manuscript and contributed to the study design, collection of data, writing of the report, and decision to submit the article for publication. They took no part in the analysis or interpretation of data. All authors had full access to all of the data in the study and can take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Dr Marshall, Ms Firanek, Mr Nariai, Dr Sloand, and Dr Yao are employees of Baxter Healthcare. Dr Wada receives speaker honoraria from Daiichi Sankyo, MSD, Tanabe Mitsubishi, and Taisho Toyama and grant support from Baxter, Dainippon Sumitomo, Ono, and Teijin Pharma. The remaining authors declare that they have no relevant financial interests. We gratefully acknowledge Drs T. de Moraes, F. Finkelstein, C. Higuchi, C.-C. Huang, and C.C. Szeto for responding to our queries regarding their RCTs; Ms K. Doni for screening conference abstracts; and Mr Bruce (Weihua) Yin for performing the literature search in Chinese databases; and thank Mr H. van Rhee for providing support with Meta-Essentials. All qualified investigators will be allowed access to new study data presented in this report, subject to legal and ethical requirements. The CSRs that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Additional data sets that were provided by clinical trial authors and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. Received March 7, 2019. Evaluated by 3 external peer reviewers, with direct editorial input from a Statistics/Methods Editor, an Associate Editor, and the Editor-in-Chief. Accepted in revised form October 7, 2019.
Funding Information:
This study was funded by Baxter Healthcare International. Employees of the funding body co-authored the manuscript and contributed to the study design, collection of data, writing of the report, and decision to submit the article for publication. They took no part in the analysis or interpretation of data. All authors had full access to all of the data in the study and can take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
Funding Information:
Dr Marshall, Ms Firanek, Mr Nariai, Dr Sloand, and Dr Yao are employees of Baxter Healthcare. Dr Wada receives speaker honoraria from Daiichi Sankyo, MSD, Tanabe Mitsubishi, and Taisho Toyama and grant support from Baxter, Dainippon Sumitomo, Ono, and Teijin Pharma. The remaining authors declare that they have no relevant financial interests.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 The Authors
PY - 2020/6
Y1 - 2020/6
N2 - Rationale & Objective: The efficacy and safety of icodextrin versus glucose-only peritoneal dialysis (PD) regimens is unclear. The aim of this study was to compare once-daily long-dwell icodextrin versus glucose among patients with kidney failure undergoing PD. Study Design: Systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), enriched with unpublished data from investigator-initiated and industry-sponsored studies. Setting & Study Populations: Individuals with kidney failure receiving regular PD treatment enrolled in clinical trials of dialysate composition. Selection Criteria for Studies: Medline, Embase, CENTRAL, Ichushi Web, 10 Chinese databases, clinical trials registries, conference proceedings, and citation lists from inception to November 2018. Further data were obtained from principal investigators and industry clinical study reports. Data Extraction: 2 independent reviewers selected studies and extracted data using a prespecified extraction instrument. Analytic Approach: Qualitative synthesis of demographics, measurement scales, and outcomes. Quantitative synthesis with Mantel-Haenszel risk ratios (RRs), Peto odds ratios (ORs), or (standardized) mean differences (MDs). Risk of bias of included studies at the outcome level was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for RCTs. Results: 19 RCTs that enrolled 1,693 participants were meta-analyzed. Ultrafiltration was improved with icodextrin (medium-term MD, 208.92 [95% CI, 99.69-318.14] mL/24 h; high certainty of evidence), reflected also by fewer episodes of fluid overload (RR, 0.43 [95% CI, 0.24-0.78]; high certainty). Icodextrin-containing PD probably decreased mortality risk compared to glucose-only PD (Peto OR, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.24-1.00]; moderate certainty). Despite evidence of lower peritoneal glucose absorption with icodextrin-containing PD (medium-term MD, −40.84 [95% CI, −48.09 to −33.59] g/long dwell; high certainty), this did not directly translate to changes in fasting plasma glucose (−0.50 [95% CI, −1.19 to 0.18] mmol/L; low certainty) and hemoglobin A1c levels (−0.14% [95% CI, −0.34% to 0.05%]; high certainty). Safety outcomes and residual kidney function were similar in both groups; health-related quality-of-life and pain scores were inconclusive. Limitations: Trial quality was variable. The follow-up period was heterogeneous, with a paucity of assessments over the long term. Mortality results are based on just 32 events and were not corroborated using time-to-event analysis of individual patient data. Conclusions: Icodextrin for once-daily long-dwell PD has clinical benefit for some patients, including those not meeting ultrafiltration targets and at risk for fluid overload. Future research into patient-centered outcomes and cost-effectiveness associated with icodextrin is needed.
AB - Rationale & Objective: The efficacy and safety of icodextrin versus glucose-only peritoneal dialysis (PD) regimens is unclear. The aim of this study was to compare once-daily long-dwell icodextrin versus glucose among patients with kidney failure undergoing PD. Study Design: Systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), enriched with unpublished data from investigator-initiated and industry-sponsored studies. Setting & Study Populations: Individuals with kidney failure receiving regular PD treatment enrolled in clinical trials of dialysate composition. Selection Criteria for Studies: Medline, Embase, CENTRAL, Ichushi Web, 10 Chinese databases, clinical trials registries, conference proceedings, and citation lists from inception to November 2018. Further data were obtained from principal investigators and industry clinical study reports. Data Extraction: 2 independent reviewers selected studies and extracted data using a prespecified extraction instrument. Analytic Approach: Qualitative synthesis of demographics, measurement scales, and outcomes. Quantitative synthesis with Mantel-Haenszel risk ratios (RRs), Peto odds ratios (ORs), or (standardized) mean differences (MDs). Risk of bias of included studies at the outcome level was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for RCTs. Results: 19 RCTs that enrolled 1,693 participants were meta-analyzed. Ultrafiltration was improved with icodextrin (medium-term MD, 208.92 [95% CI, 99.69-318.14] mL/24 h; high certainty of evidence), reflected also by fewer episodes of fluid overload (RR, 0.43 [95% CI, 0.24-0.78]; high certainty). Icodextrin-containing PD probably decreased mortality risk compared to glucose-only PD (Peto OR, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.24-1.00]; moderate certainty). Despite evidence of lower peritoneal glucose absorption with icodextrin-containing PD (medium-term MD, −40.84 [95% CI, −48.09 to −33.59] g/long dwell; high certainty), this did not directly translate to changes in fasting plasma glucose (−0.50 [95% CI, −1.19 to 0.18] mmol/L; low certainty) and hemoglobin A1c levels (−0.14% [95% CI, −0.34% to 0.05%]; high certainty). Safety outcomes and residual kidney function were similar in both groups; health-related quality-of-life and pain scores were inconclusive. Limitations: Trial quality was variable. The follow-up period was heterogeneous, with a paucity of assessments over the long term. Mortality results are based on just 32 events and were not corroborated using time-to-event analysis of individual patient data. Conclusions: Icodextrin for once-daily long-dwell PD has clinical benefit for some patients, including those not meeting ultrafiltration targets and at risk for fluid overload. Future research into patient-centered outcomes and cost-effectiveness associated with icodextrin is needed.
KW - HRQoL
KW - Icodextrin
KW - PD solution
KW - PD technique survival
KW - UF volume
KW - dialysate
KW - end-stage kidney disease (ESKD)
KW - fluid overload
KW - glucose
KW - long-dwell
KW - meta-analysis
KW - mortality risk
KW - patient survival
KW - peritoneal dialysis (PD)
KW - renal failure
KW - renal replacement therapy (RRT)
KW - residual urine volume
KW - safety
KW - systematic review
KW - ultrafiltration (UF)
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85078931205&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85078931205&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.10.004
DO - 10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.10.004
M3 - Article
C2 - 32033860
AN - SCOPUS:85078931205
SN - 0272-6386
VL - 75
SP - 830
EP - 846
JO - American Journal of Kidney Diseases
JF - American Journal of Kidney Diseases
IS - 6
ER -