Hydrolytic stability of three-step etch-and-rinse adhesives in occlusal class-I cavities

Jan De Munck, Atsushi Mine, Marcio Vivan Cardoso, Kirsten L. Van Landuyt, Anne Katrin Lührs, André Poitevin, Masao Hanabusa, Takuo Kuboki, Bart Van Meerbeek

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: A dental adhesive without small and hydrophilic monomers such as 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) and triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) would be beneficial in order to avoid contact allergies. However, these monomers are important to increase infiltration and polymerization of the adhesive. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the bonding effectiveness and bond durability of a more hydrophobic and biocompatible adhesive as compared to a conventional three-step etch-and-rinse adhesive. Methods: Sixteen non-carious human third molars were used to determine the micro-tensile bond strength testing (μTBS) and interfacial ultrastructure by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) of the more hydrophobic cmf adhesive system (Saremco) adhesive as compared to the control OptiBond FL (Kerr). Results: The more hydrophobic and biocompatible three-step etch-and-rinse adhesive was able to produce a reasonable short-time bonding effectiveness. In the long term, the collagen fibrils in the hybrid layer were not effectively protected and were prone to hydrolytic degradation. As a result, long-term bonding effectiveness of this novel adhesive was very low. Conclusions: Application of a more hydrophobic adhesive without altering the application procedure considerably results in a reduced durability of the created bond Clinical relevance: Omitting small and hydrophilic components from the adhesive formulation may impair the durability of your composite restoration.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1911-1918
Number of pages8
JournalClinical Oral Investigations
Volume17
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2013

Fingerprint

Adhesives
Dental Cements
Third Molar
Tensile Strength
Transmission Electron Microscopy
Polymerization
Hypersensitivity
Collagen

Keywords

  • Allergy
  • Bond strength
  • Class-I cavity dentin
  • Durability
  • TEM
  • Three-step etch-and-rinse

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

De Munck, J., Mine, A., Vivan Cardoso, M., Van Landuyt, K. L., Lührs, A. K., Poitevin, A., ... Van Meerbeek, B. (2013). Hydrolytic stability of three-step etch-and-rinse adhesives in occlusal class-I cavities. Clinical Oral Investigations, 17(8), 1911-1918. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-012-0884-0

Hydrolytic stability of three-step etch-and-rinse adhesives in occlusal class-I cavities. / De Munck, Jan; Mine, Atsushi; Vivan Cardoso, Marcio; Van Landuyt, Kirsten L.; Lührs, Anne Katrin; Poitevin, André; Hanabusa, Masao; Kuboki, Takuo; Van Meerbeek, Bart.

In: Clinical Oral Investigations, Vol. 17, No. 8, 11.2013, p. 1911-1918.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

De Munck, J, Mine, A, Vivan Cardoso, M, Van Landuyt, KL, Lührs, AK, Poitevin, A, Hanabusa, M, Kuboki, T & Van Meerbeek, B 2013, 'Hydrolytic stability of three-step etch-and-rinse adhesives in occlusal class-I cavities', Clinical Oral Investigations, vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 1911-1918. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-012-0884-0
De Munck J, Mine A, Vivan Cardoso M, Van Landuyt KL, Lührs AK, Poitevin A et al. Hydrolytic stability of three-step etch-and-rinse adhesives in occlusal class-I cavities. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2013 Nov;17(8):1911-1918. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-012-0884-0
De Munck, Jan ; Mine, Atsushi ; Vivan Cardoso, Marcio ; Van Landuyt, Kirsten L. ; Lührs, Anne Katrin ; Poitevin, André ; Hanabusa, Masao ; Kuboki, Takuo ; Van Meerbeek, Bart. / Hydrolytic stability of three-step etch-and-rinse adhesives in occlusal class-I cavities. In: Clinical Oral Investigations. 2013 ; Vol. 17, No. 8. pp. 1911-1918.
@article{655e5d1e697d48fb9a7c23414638cb03,
title = "Hydrolytic stability of three-step etch-and-rinse adhesives in occlusal class-I cavities",
abstract = "Objectives: A dental adhesive without small and hydrophilic monomers such as 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) and triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) would be beneficial in order to avoid contact allergies. However, these monomers are important to increase infiltration and polymerization of the adhesive. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the bonding effectiveness and bond durability of a more hydrophobic and biocompatible adhesive as compared to a conventional three-step etch-and-rinse adhesive. Methods: Sixteen non-carious human third molars were used to determine the micro-tensile bond strength testing (μTBS) and interfacial ultrastructure by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) of the more hydrophobic cmf adhesive system (Saremco) adhesive as compared to the control OptiBond FL (Kerr). Results: The more hydrophobic and biocompatible three-step etch-and-rinse adhesive was able to produce a reasonable short-time bonding effectiveness. In the long term, the collagen fibrils in the hybrid layer were not effectively protected and were prone to hydrolytic degradation. As a result, long-term bonding effectiveness of this novel adhesive was very low. Conclusions: Application of a more hydrophobic adhesive without altering the application procedure considerably results in a reduced durability of the created bond Clinical relevance: Omitting small and hydrophilic components from the adhesive formulation may impair the durability of your composite restoration.",
keywords = "Allergy, Bond strength, Class-I cavity dentin, Durability, TEM, Three-step etch-and-rinse",
author = "{De Munck}, Jan and Atsushi Mine and {Vivan Cardoso}, Marcio and {Van Landuyt}, {Kirsten L.} and L{\"u}hrs, {Anne Katrin} and Andr{\'e} Poitevin and Masao Hanabusa and Takuo Kuboki and {Van Meerbeek}, Bart",
year = "2013",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1007/s00784-012-0884-0",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "1911--1918",
journal = "Clinical Oral Investigations",
issn = "1432-6981",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Hydrolytic stability of three-step etch-and-rinse adhesives in occlusal class-I cavities

AU - De Munck, Jan

AU - Mine, Atsushi

AU - Vivan Cardoso, Marcio

AU - Van Landuyt, Kirsten L.

AU - Lührs, Anne Katrin

AU - Poitevin, André

AU - Hanabusa, Masao

AU - Kuboki, Takuo

AU - Van Meerbeek, Bart

PY - 2013/11

Y1 - 2013/11

N2 - Objectives: A dental adhesive without small and hydrophilic monomers such as 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) and triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) would be beneficial in order to avoid contact allergies. However, these monomers are important to increase infiltration and polymerization of the adhesive. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the bonding effectiveness and bond durability of a more hydrophobic and biocompatible adhesive as compared to a conventional three-step etch-and-rinse adhesive. Methods: Sixteen non-carious human third molars were used to determine the micro-tensile bond strength testing (μTBS) and interfacial ultrastructure by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) of the more hydrophobic cmf adhesive system (Saremco) adhesive as compared to the control OptiBond FL (Kerr). Results: The more hydrophobic and biocompatible three-step etch-and-rinse adhesive was able to produce a reasonable short-time bonding effectiveness. In the long term, the collagen fibrils in the hybrid layer were not effectively protected and were prone to hydrolytic degradation. As a result, long-term bonding effectiveness of this novel adhesive was very low. Conclusions: Application of a more hydrophobic adhesive without altering the application procedure considerably results in a reduced durability of the created bond Clinical relevance: Omitting small and hydrophilic components from the adhesive formulation may impair the durability of your composite restoration.

AB - Objectives: A dental adhesive without small and hydrophilic monomers such as 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) and triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) would be beneficial in order to avoid contact allergies. However, these monomers are important to increase infiltration and polymerization of the adhesive. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the bonding effectiveness and bond durability of a more hydrophobic and biocompatible adhesive as compared to a conventional three-step etch-and-rinse adhesive. Methods: Sixteen non-carious human third molars were used to determine the micro-tensile bond strength testing (μTBS) and interfacial ultrastructure by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) of the more hydrophobic cmf adhesive system (Saremco) adhesive as compared to the control OptiBond FL (Kerr). Results: The more hydrophobic and biocompatible three-step etch-and-rinse adhesive was able to produce a reasonable short-time bonding effectiveness. In the long term, the collagen fibrils in the hybrid layer were not effectively protected and were prone to hydrolytic degradation. As a result, long-term bonding effectiveness of this novel adhesive was very low. Conclusions: Application of a more hydrophobic adhesive without altering the application procedure considerably results in a reduced durability of the created bond Clinical relevance: Omitting small and hydrophilic components from the adhesive formulation may impair the durability of your composite restoration.

KW - Allergy

KW - Bond strength

KW - Class-I cavity dentin

KW - Durability

KW - TEM

KW - Three-step etch-and-rinse

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84886583313&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84886583313&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00784-012-0884-0

DO - 10.1007/s00784-012-0884-0

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 1911

EP - 1918

JO - Clinical Oral Investigations

JF - Clinical Oral Investigations

SN - 1432-6981

IS - 8

ER -