TY - JOUR
T1 - Hip fractures following intramedullary nailing fixation for femoral fractures
AU - Yamamoto, Norio
AU - Yamakawa, Yasuaki
AU - Inokuchi, Takashi
AU - Iwamoto, Yuki
AU - Inoue, Tomoo
AU - Noda, Tomoyuki
AU - Kawasaki, Keisuke
AU - Ozaki, Toshifumi
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding : The English editing fee was supported by a systematic review workshop peer support group (not-for-profit organization). The funders played no role in the design of the study, collection, analysis, and interpretation of data, or in writing the manuscript.
Funding Information:
We thank Kiyoto Kinugasa, Toshinori Matsumoto, and Yukio Kawakami for cooperating in this multi-center study, Yoshimitsu Shimomura for providing detailed information on the analysis, and Yusuke Mochizuki for conducting literature review. This work was supported by the Systematic Review Workshop Peer Support Group (SRWS-PSG).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Introduction: Proximal peri-implant femoral fractures occur following intramedullary nailing (IMN) fixation for trochanteric, femoral shaft, and distal femoral fractures. However, analyses of secondary hip fractures (SHFs) using large clinical samples are lacking. Therefore, we aimed to report the incidence and clinical outcomes of SHF after nailing fixation (IMN or cephalomedullary nailing [CMN]) for overall femoral fractures. In addition, we focused on IMN for femoral shaft fractures and investigated the risk factors for SHF. Methods: This multicenter, retrospective, cohort study included 2,293 patients aged > 60 years who underwent nailing fixation for femoral fractures. The primary outcome was the incidence of SHF. In the assessment of clinical outcomes, we evaluated reoperation and the regaining of walking ability following SHF management. In addition, we conducted multivariable logistic regression analyses to examine the association between risk factors and SHF. Results: Seventeen (0.7%) patients had SHFs, including 12 femoral neck fractures and 5 trochanteric fractures. Antegrade IMN was the most common type of nailing fixation. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that the absence of femoral head fixation was significantly associated with the incidence of SHF following IMN for femoral shaft fractures (odds ratio, 17.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.9–2265.7; p=0.006). In the assessment of clinical outcomes, there were two reoperations (16.7%) in the secondary femoral neck fracture group. Patients with secondary trochanteric fractures tended to have a lower probability of regaining walking ability than those with secondary femoral neck fractures (20% vs. 50%). Conclusions: In this multicenter study, the incidence of SHF after nail fixation for femoral fractures was 0.7%. The absence of femoral head fixation was significantly associated with SHF, and the clinical outcomes were poor. Therefore, femoral head fixation at the initial IMN fixation for femoral fractures may be a fixation option for surgeons to consider as an SHF prevention measure.
AB - Introduction: Proximal peri-implant femoral fractures occur following intramedullary nailing (IMN) fixation for trochanteric, femoral shaft, and distal femoral fractures. However, analyses of secondary hip fractures (SHFs) using large clinical samples are lacking. Therefore, we aimed to report the incidence and clinical outcomes of SHF after nailing fixation (IMN or cephalomedullary nailing [CMN]) for overall femoral fractures. In addition, we focused on IMN for femoral shaft fractures and investigated the risk factors for SHF. Methods: This multicenter, retrospective, cohort study included 2,293 patients aged > 60 years who underwent nailing fixation for femoral fractures. The primary outcome was the incidence of SHF. In the assessment of clinical outcomes, we evaluated reoperation and the regaining of walking ability following SHF management. In addition, we conducted multivariable logistic regression analyses to examine the association between risk factors and SHF. Results: Seventeen (0.7%) patients had SHFs, including 12 femoral neck fractures and 5 trochanteric fractures. Antegrade IMN was the most common type of nailing fixation. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that the absence of femoral head fixation was significantly associated with the incidence of SHF following IMN for femoral shaft fractures (odds ratio, 17.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.9–2265.7; p=0.006). In the assessment of clinical outcomes, there were two reoperations (16.7%) in the secondary femoral neck fracture group. Patients with secondary trochanteric fractures tended to have a lower probability of regaining walking ability than those with secondary femoral neck fractures (20% vs. 50%). Conclusions: In this multicenter study, the incidence of SHF after nail fixation for femoral fractures was 0.7%. The absence of femoral head fixation was significantly associated with SHF, and the clinical outcomes were poor. Therefore, femoral head fixation at the initial IMN fixation for femoral fractures may be a fixation option for surgeons to consider as an SHF prevention measure.
KW - atypical femoral fracture
KW - cephalomedullary nail
KW - distal femoral fracture
KW - femoral neck fracture
KW - femoral shaft fracture
KW - hip fracture
KW - intramedullary nail
KW - reoperation
KW - trochanteric fracture
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85118691876&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85118691876&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.injury.2021.10.024
DO - 10.1016/j.injury.2021.10.024
M3 - Article
C2 - 34749907
AN - SCOPUS:85118691876
SN - 0020-1383
JO - Injury
JF - Injury
ER -