Health-related quality of life after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in elderly patients with an ileal conduit, ureterocutaneostomy, or orthotopic urinary reservoir: A comparative questionnaire survey

Takashi Saika, Ryoji Arata, Tomoyasu Tsushima, Yasutomo Nasu, Bunzo Suyama, Katsuji Takeda, Shin Ebara, Daisuke Manabe, Tomoko Kobayashi, Ryuta Tanimoto, Hiromi Kumon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To compare the health-related quality of life of elderly patients after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in urinary diversion groups: ileal conduit, ureterocutaneostomy, or orthotopic urinary reservoir. The 109 participating elderly patients aged 75 or older completed self-reporting questionnaires: the QLQ-C30, and on satisfaction with urinary diversion methods. Fifty-six patients had undergone constructions for ileal conduit diversion, 31 for ureterocutaneostomy, and 22 for orthotopic urinary reservoir (OUR). The median follow-up period for each group was 4.0 years (range 0.3-11.2), 4.5 years (range 0.3-18.0), and 3.3 years (range 0.3-6.7), respectively. Regardless of the type of urinary diversion, the majority of patients reported having good overall quality of life, although with some problem of pain. No significant differences among urinary diversion subgroups were found in any quality of life area in the QLQ-C30 questionnaire. More patients in the OUR sub-group felt disappointment than those in the ileal conduit or cutaneostomy sub-groups. However, a questionnaire which asked which diversion method would be preferable showed a trend that more patients in the OUR subgroup would have chosen the same one. Health-related quality of life appeared relatively good in these 3 groups. Patient demands and expectations may be so different from the results that the details of each urinary diversion method should be explained thoroughly. OUR construction could be a candidate even for elderly patients. Copyright

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)199-203
Number of pages5
JournalActa Medica Okayama
Volume61
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2007

Fingerprint

Urinary Diversion
Cystectomy
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms
Quality of Life
Health
Surveys and Questionnaires
Pain

Keywords

  • Bladder cancer
  • Cystectomy
  • Neo-bladder
  • QOL
  • Urinary diversion

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)

Cite this

Health-related quality of life after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in elderly patients with an ileal conduit, ureterocutaneostomy, or orthotopic urinary reservoir : A comparative questionnaire survey. / Saika, Takashi; Arata, Ryoji; Tsushima, Tomoyasu; Nasu, Yasutomo; Suyama, Bunzo; Takeda, Katsuji; Ebara, Shin; Manabe, Daisuke; Kobayashi, Tomoko; Tanimoto, Ryuta; Kumon, Hiromi.

In: Acta Medica Okayama, Vol. 61, No. 4, 08.2007, p. 199-203.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Saika, Takashi ; Arata, Ryoji ; Tsushima, Tomoyasu ; Nasu, Yasutomo ; Suyama, Bunzo ; Takeda, Katsuji ; Ebara, Shin ; Manabe, Daisuke ; Kobayashi, Tomoko ; Tanimoto, Ryuta ; Kumon, Hiromi. / Health-related quality of life after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in elderly patients with an ileal conduit, ureterocutaneostomy, or orthotopic urinary reservoir : A comparative questionnaire survey. In: Acta Medica Okayama. 2007 ; Vol. 61, No. 4. pp. 199-203.
@article{3a245be6f1074301959900039beda3b8,
title = "Health-related quality of life after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in elderly patients with an ileal conduit, ureterocutaneostomy, or orthotopic urinary reservoir: A comparative questionnaire survey",
abstract = "To compare the health-related quality of life of elderly patients after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in urinary diversion groups: ileal conduit, ureterocutaneostomy, or orthotopic urinary reservoir. The 109 participating elderly patients aged 75 or older completed self-reporting questionnaires: the QLQ-C30, and on satisfaction with urinary diversion methods. Fifty-six patients had undergone constructions for ileal conduit diversion, 31 for ureterocutaneostomy, and 22 for orthotopic urinary reservoir (OUR). The median follow-up period for each group was 4.0 years (range 0.3-11.2), 4.5 years (range 0.3-18.0), and 3.3 years (range 0.3-6.7), respectively. Regardless of the type of urinary diversion, the majority of patients reported having good overall quality of life, although with some problem of pain. No significant differences among urinary diversion subgroups were found in any quality of life area in the QLQ-C30 questionnaire. More patients in the OUR sub-group felt disappointment than those in the ileal conduit or cutaneostomy sub-groups. However, a questionnaire which asked which diversion method would be preferable showed a trend that more patients in the OUR subgroup would have chosen the same one. Health-related quality of life appeared relatively good in these 3 groups. Patient demands and expectations may be so different from the results that the details of each urinary diversion method should be explained thoroughly. OUR construction could be a candidate even for elderly patients. Copyright",
keywords = "Bladder cancer, Cystectomy, Neo-bladder, QOL, Urinary diversion",
author = "Takashi Saika and Ryoji Arata and Tomoyasu Tsushima and Yasutomo Nasu and Bunzo Suyama and Katsuji Takeda and Shin Ebara and Daisuke Manabe and Tomoko Kobayashi and Ryuta Tanimoto and Hiromi Kumon",
year = "2007",
month = "8",
language = "English",
volume = "61",
pages = "199--203",
journal = "Acta Medica Okayama",
issn = "0386-300X",
publisher = "Okayama University",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Health-related quality of life after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in elderly patients with an ileal conduit, ureterocutaneostomy, or orthotopic urinary reservoir

T2 - A comparative questionnaire survey

AU - Saika, Takashi

AU - Arata, Ryoji

AU - Tsushima, Tomoyasu

AU - Nasu, Yasutomo

AU - Suyama, Bunzo

AU - Takeda, Katsuji

AU - Ebara, Shin

AU - Manabe, Daisuke

AU - Kobayashi, Tomoko

AU - Tanimoto, Ryuta

AU - Kumon, Hiromi

PY - 2007/8

Y1 - 2007/8

N2 - To compare the health-related quality of life of elderly patients after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in urinary diversion groups: ileal conduit, ureterocutaneostomy, or orthotopic urinary reservoir. The 109 participating elderly patients aged 75 or older completed self-reporting questionnaires: the QLQ-C30, and on satisfaction with urinary diversion methods. Fifty-six patients had undergone constructions for ileal conduit diversion, 31 for ureterocutaneostomy, and 22 for orthotopic urinary reservoir (OUR). The median follow-up period for each group was 4.0 years (range 0.3-11.2), 4.5 years (range 0.3-18.0), and 3.3 years (range 0.3-6.7), respectively. Regardless of the type of urinary diversion, the majority of patients reported having good overall quality of life, although with some problem of pain. No significant differences among urinary diversion subgroups were found in any quality of life area in the QLQ-C30 questionnaire. More patients in the OUR sub-group felt disappointment than those in the ileal conduit or cutaneostomy sub-groups. However, a questionnaire which asked which diversion method would be preferable showed a trend that more patients in the OUR subgroup would have chosen the same one. Health-related quality of life appeared relatively good in these 3 groups. Patient demands and expectations may be so different from the results that the details of each urinary diversion method should be explained thoroughly. OUR construction could be a candidate even for elderly patients. Copyright

AB - To compare the health-related quality of life of elderly patients after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in urinary diversion groups: ileal conduit, ureterocutaneostomy, or orthotopic urinary reservoir. The 109 participating elderly patients aged 75 or older completed self-reporting questionnaires: the QLQ-C30, and on satisfaction with urinary diversion methods. Fifty-six patients had undergone constructions for ileal conduit diversion, 31 for ureterocutaneostomy, and 22 for orthotopic urinary reservoir (OUR). The median follow-up period for each group was 4.0 years (range 0.3-11.2), 4.5 years (range 0.3-18.0), and 3.3 years (range 0.3-6.7), respectively. Regardless of the type of urinary diversion, the majority of patients reported having good overall quality of life, although with some problem of pain. No significant differences among urinary diversion subgroups were found in any quality of life area in the QLQ-C30 questionnaire. More patients in the OUR sub-group felt disappointment than those in the ileal conduit or cutaneostomy sub-groups. However, a questionnaire which asked which diversion method would be preferable showed a trend that more patients in the OUR subgroup would have chosen the same one. Health-related quality of life appeared relatively good in these 3 groups. Patient demands and expectations may be so different from the results that the details of each urinary diversion method should be explained thoroughly. OUR construction could be a candidate even for elderly patients. Copyright

KW - Bladder cancer

KW - Cystectomy

KW - Neo-bladder

KW - QOL

KW - Urinary diversion

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34848873429&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34848873429&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 17853939

AN - SCOPUS:34848873429

VL - 61

SP - 199

EP - 203

JO - Acta Medica Okayama

JF - Acta Medica Okayama

SN - 0386-300X

IS - 4

ER -