Grain boundaries as weak links: The case of (formula presented) with reference to (formula presented)

S. B. Samanta, H. Narayan, A. Gupta, A. V. Narlikar, T. Muranaka, Jun Akimitsu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The grain boundaries (GB’s) in the intermetallic superconductor (formula presented) interestingly, do not show suppression of supercurrent density. This unexpected behavior has been investigated by a scanning tunneling microscopy/spectroscopy technique at atomic resolution. The GB in (formula presented) is seen as an amorphous region extending from 50 to 200 Å and has a metallic character. This observation supports proximity coupling between the grains, which explains why supercurrent density does not degrade in this material. The results for another intermetallic superconductor (formula presented) having GB’s (average width 30 Å) that are quasi-insulating in nature have also been presented and compared with the former.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-3
Number of pages3
JournalPhysical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics
Volume65
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Grain boundaries
grain boundaries
Superconducting materials
Intermetallics
intermetallics
Scanning tunneling microscopy
proximity
scanning tunneling microscopy
retarding
Spectroscopy
spectroscopy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
  • Condensed Matter Physics

Cite this

Grain boundaries as weak links : The case of (formula presented) with reference to (formula presented). / Samanta, S. B.; Narayan, H.; Gupta, A.; Narlikar, A. V.; Muranaka, T.; Akimitsu, Jun.

In: Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, Vol. 65, No. 9, 01.01.2002, p. 1-3.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4721df56d927410e8deab49ea48d9fc5,
title = "Grain boundaries as weak links: The case of (formula presented) with reference to (formula presented)",
abstract = "The grain boundaries (GB’s) in the intermetallic superconductor (formula presented) interestingly, do not show suppression of supercurrent density. This unexpected behavior has been investigated by a scanning tunneling microscopy/spectroscopy technique at atomic resolution. The GB in (formula presented) is seen as an amorphous region extending from 50 to 200 {\AA} and has a metallic character. This observation supports proximity coupling between the grains, which explains why supercurrent density does not degrade in this material. The results for another intermetallic superconductor (formula presented) having GB’s (average width 30 {\AA}) that are quasi-insulating in nature have also been presented and compared with the former.",
author = "Samanta, {S. B.} and H. Narayan and A. Gupta and Narlikar, {A. V.} and T. Muranaka and Jun Akimitsu",
year = "2002",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1103/PhysRevB.65.092510",
language = "English",
volume = "65",
pages = "1--3",
journal = "Physical Review B-Condensed Matter",
issn = "1098-0121",
publisher = "American Physical Society",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Grain boundaries as weak links

T2 - The case of (formula presented) with reference to (formula presented)

AU - Samanta, S. B.

AU - Narayan, H.

AU - Gupta, A.

AU - Narlikar, A. V.

AU - Muranaka, T.

AU - Akimitsu, Jun

PY - 2002/1/1

Y1 - 2002/1/1

N2 - The grain boundaries (GB’s) in the intermetallic superconductor (formula presented) interestingly, do not show suppression of supercurrent density. This unexpected behavior has been investigated by a scanning tunneling microscopy/spectroscopy technique at atomic resolution. The GB in (formula presented) is seen as an amorphous region extending from 50 to 200 Å and has a metallic character. This observation supports proximity coupling between the grains, which explains why supercurrent density does not degrade in this material. The results for another intermetallic superconductor (formula presented) having GB’s (average width 30 Å) that are quasi-insulating in nature have also been presented and compared with the former.

AB - The grain boundaries (GB’s) in the intermetallic superconductor (formula presented) interestingly, do not show suppression of supercurrent density. This unexpected behavior has been investigated by a scanning tunneling microscopy/spectroscopy technique at atomic resolution. The GB in (formula presented) is seen as an amorphous region extending from 50 to 200 Å and has a metallic character. This observation supports proximity coupling between the grains, which explains why supercurrent density does not degrade in this material. The results for another intermetallic superconductor (formula presented) having GB’s (average width 30 Å) that are quasi-insulating in nature have also been presented and compared with the former.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85038285253&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85038285253&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.092510

DO - 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.092510

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85038285253

VL - 65

SP - 1

EP - 3

JO - Physical Review B-Condensed Matter

JF - Physical Review B-Condensed Matter

SN - 1098-0121

IS - 9

ER -