Functional residual capacity breath hold for subtraction image of dynamic liver MRI

Akihiko Tabuchi, Toshizo Katsuda, Mari Eguchi, Rumi Gotanda, Tatsuhiro Gotanda, Masahiko Mitani, Yoshihiro Takeda

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: In dynamic liver magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies, there are problems with misregistration when subtraction images are processed. For reduction of the misregistration, a functional residual capacity (FRC) phase breath-hold (FRC B-H) method was used. Material and methods: Sixty patients (32 males and 28 females, aged 33-85 years, median age 69 years) were examined. The subjects were chronologically categorized into two groups: a voluntary expiratory (VE) B-H group and a FRC B-H group. The blood-flow phase images were classified as plain, arterial, portal and parenchymal phases. To evaluate the reproducibility of liver positions between VE B-H and FRC B-H in each phase (between Plain and Arterial, Arterial and Portal, Plain and Parenchymal), the misregistration areas were compared on the top of the liver. Results: The misregistration area between Plain-Arterial, Arterial-Portal and Plain-Parenchymal in VE B-H was 731.0 ± 1153.6, 1134.9 ± 1357.2 and 628.4 ± 844.5 (cm2), respectively. The misregistration area between each phase in FRC B-H was 386.4 ± 874.9, 574.5 ± 1086.1 and 279.8 ± 551.2 (cm2), respectively. Using the Mann-Whitney U-test as quantitative analysis, the difference in misregistration areas between two groups was statistically significant (p <0.05). Differences in the qualitative analysis were also significant according to the χ2 test (p <0.05). Conclusion: The liver positions with FRC B-H were markedly more reproducible than those with VE B-H. To improve the registration accuracy of subtraction dynamic liver MRI, the FRC B-H should be used.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)506-512
Number of pages7
JournalEuropean Journal of Radiology
Volume71
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2009

Fingerprint

Functional Residual Capacity
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Liver
Nonparametric Statistics

Keywords

  • Breath-hold
  • Dynamic liver MRI
  • Functional residual capacity (FRC)
  • Reproducibility
  • Subtraction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Functional residual capacity breath hold for subtraction image of dynamic liver MRI. / Tabuchi, Akihiko; Katsuda, Toshizo; Eguchi, Mari; Gotanda, Rumi; Gotanda, Tatsuhiro; Mitani, Masahiko; Takeda, Yoshihiro.

In: European Journal of Radiology, Vol. 71, No. 3, 09.2009, p. 506-512.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tabuchi, Akihiko ; Katsuda, Toshizo ; Eguchi, Mari ; Gotanda, Rumi ; Gotanda, Tatsuhiro ; Mitani, Masahiko ; Takeda, Yoshihiro. / Functional residual capacity breath hold for subtraction image of dynamic liver MRI. In: European Journal of Radiology. 2009 ; Vol. 71, No. 3. pp. 506-512.
@article{d845c86c844d49f8bbd72c50ca278498,
title = "Functional residual capacity breath hold for subtraction image of dynamic liver MRI",
abstract = "Purpose: In dynamic liver magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies, there are problems with misregistration when subtraction images are processed. For reduction of the misregistration, a functional residual capacity (FRC) phase breath-hold (FRC B-H) method was used. Material and methods: Sixty patients (32 males and 28 females, aged 33-85 years, median age 69 years) were examined. The subjects were chronologically categorized into two groups: a voluntary expiratory (VE) B-H group and a FRC B-H group. The blood-flow phase images were classified as plain, arterial, portal and parenchymal phases. To evaluate the reproducibility of liver positions between VE B-H and FRC B-H in each phase (between Plain and Arterial, Arterial and Portal, Plain and Parenchymal), the misregistration areas were compared on the top of the liver. Results: The misregistration area between Plain-Arterial, Arterial-Portal and Plain-Parenchymal in VE B-H was 731.0 ± 1153.6, 1134.9 ± 1357.2 and 628.4 ± 844.5 (cm2), respectively. The misregistration area between each phase in FRC B-H was 386.4 ± 874.9, 574.5 ± 1086.1 and 279.8 ± 551.2 (cm2), respectively. Using the Mann-Whitney U-test as quantitative analysis, the difference in misregistration areas between two groups was statistically significant (p <0.05). Differences in the qualitative analysis were also significant according to the χ2 test (p <0.05). Conclusion: The liver positions with FRC B-H were markedly more reproducible than those with VE B-H. To improve the registration accuracy of subtraction dynamic liver MRI, the FRC B-H should be used.",
keywords = "Breath-hold, Dynamic liver MRI, Functional residual capacity (FRC), Reproducibility, Subtraction",
author = "Akihiko Tabuchi and Toshizo Katsuda and Mari Eguchi and Rumi Gotanda and Tatsuhiro Gotanda and Masahiko Mitani and Yoshihiro Takeda",
year = "2009",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.06.001",
language = "English",
volume = "71",
pages = "506--512",
journal = "Journal of Medical Imaging",
issn = "0720-048X",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Functional residual capacity breath hold for subtraction image of dynamic liver MRI

AU - Tabuchi, Akihiko

AU - Katsuda, Toshizo

AU - Eguchi, Mari

AU - Gotanda, Rumi

AU - Gotanda, Tatsuhiro

AU - Mitani, Masahiko

AU - Takeda, Yoshihiro

PY - 2009/9

Y1 - 2009/9

N2 - Purpose: In dynamic liver magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies, there are problems with misregistration when subtraction images are processed. For reduction of the misregistration, a functional residual capacity (FRC) phase breath-hold (FRC B-H) method was used. Material and methods: Sixty patients (32 males and 28 females, aged 33-85 years, median age 69 years) were examined. The subjects were chronologically categorized into two groups: a voluntary expiratory (VE) B-H group and a FRC B-H group. The blood-flow phase images were classified as plain, arterial, portal and parenchymal phases. To evaluate the reproducibility of liver positions between VE B-H and FRC B-H in each phase (between Plain and Arterial, Arterial and Portal, Plain and Parenchymal), the misregistration areas were compared on the top of the liver. Results: The misregistration area between Plain-Arterial, Arterial-Portal and Plain-Parenchymal in VE B-H was 731.0 ± 1153.6, 1134.9 ± 1357.2 and 628.4 ± 844.5 (cm2), respectively. The misregistration area between each phase in FRC B-H was 386.4 ± 874.9, 574.5 ± 1086.1 and 279.8 ± 551.2 (cm2), respectively. Using the Mann-Whitney U-test as quantitative analysis, the difference in misregistration areas between two groups was statistically significant (p <0.05). Differences in the qualitative analysis were also significant according to the χ2 test (p <0.05). Conclusion: The liver positions with FRC B-H were markedly more reproducible than those with VE B-H. To improve the registration accuracy of subtraction dynamic liver MRI, the FRC B-H should be used.

AB - Purpose: In dynamic liver magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies, there are problems with misregistration when subtraction images are processed. For reduction of the misregistration, a functional residual capacity (FRC) phase breath-hold (FRC B-H) method was used. Material and methods: Sixty patients (32 males and 28 females, aged 33-85 years, median age 69 years) were examined. The subjects were chronologically categorized into two groups: a voluntary expiratory (VE) B-H group and a FRC B-H group. The blood-flow phase images were classified as plain, arterial, portal and parenchymal phases. To evaluate the reproducibility of liver positions between VE B-H and FRC B-H in each phase (between Plain and Arterial, Arterial and Portal, Plain and Parenchymal), the misregistration areas were compared on the top of the liver. Results: The misregistration area between Plain-Arterial, Arterial-Portal and Plain-Parenchymal in VE B-H was 731.0 ± 1153.6, 1134.9 ± 1357.2 and 628.4 ± 844.5 (cm2), respectively. The misregistration area between each phase in FRC B-H was 386.4 ± 874.9, 574.5 ± 1086.1 and 279.8 ± 551.2 (cm2), respectively. Using the Mann-Whitney U-test as quantitative analysis, the difference in misregistration areas between two groups was statistically significant (p <0.05). Differences in the qualitative analysis were also significant according to the χ2 test (p <0.05). Conclusion: The liver positions with FRC B-H were markedly more reproducible than those with VE B-H. To improve the registration accuracy of subtraction dynamic liver MRI, the FRC B-H should be used.

KW - Breath-hold

KW - Dynamic liver MRI

KW - Functional residual capacity (FRC)

KW - Reproducibility

KW - Subtraction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=69849115866&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=69849115866&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.06.001

DO - 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.06.001

M3 - Article

C2 - 18632237

AN - SCOPUS:69849115866

VL - 71

SP - 506

EP - 512

JO - Journal of Medical Imaging

JF - Journal of Medical Imaging

SN - 0720-048X

IS - 3

ER -