Abstract
Interleukin-8 (IL-8: CXCL8) and growth related oncogene α (GROα: CXCL1) are members of the CXC chemokines. In the present study, we explored the functional distinction between these CXC chemokines in the regulation of neutrophil infiltration. Injection of either rabbit IL-8 or GROα (10 μg each) into rabbit knee joints resulted in a massive neutrophil infiltration in the joints. At their peak time point (6 hours), the number of neutrophils induced by IL-8 was more than that induced by GROα. Each chemokine induced the other chemokine in the joints. TNFα activity was induced in the joints after administration of GROα, but not IL-8. Treatment with anti-GROα mAb and/or anti-TNFα mAb failed to inhibit IL-8-induced neutrophil infiltration. In contrast, either anti-IL-8 IgG or anti-TNFα mAb decreased GROα-induced response, and the inhibition was further enhanced by coadministration of these antibodies. Thus, it appears that IL-8 acts directly, whereas GROα acts indirectly, in part, on neutrophil infiltration. The distinct difference in TNFα production between IL-8 and GROα was further investigated. In vitro, GROα induced TNFα activity in cultured synovial cells, the cells producing TNFα in the joints after GROα-injection. However, IL-8 failed to produce TNFα activity from the cells, although equivalent levels of the mRNA expression were induced by IL-8 as compared with GROα. When recombinant rabbit TNFα was incubated with synovial fluids obtained at 2 hours after IL-8 injection, the resultant TNFα activity was significantly decreased, an event that was completely restored by a serine protease inhibitor, phenylmethylsulphonyl fluoride (PMSF). Furthermore, TNFα activity was unveiled in the joints when IL-8 was intra-articularly injected with PMSF. These data suggest that TNFα is degraded by serine protease(s) in the case of IL-8. Taken together, the data clearly demonstrate the functional distinction between IL-8 and GROα, which may influence the inflammatory responses.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 15-23 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Laboratory Investigation |
| Volume | 82 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Publication status | Published - 2002 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine
Cite this
Functional distinction between CXC chemokines, interleukin-8 (IL-8), and growth related oncogene (GRO)α in neutrophil infiltration. / Fujiwara, Kazunori; Matsukawa, Akihiro; Ohkawara, Susumu; Takagi, Katsumasa; Yoshinaga, Masaru.
In: Laboratory Investigation, Vol. 82, No. 1, 2002, p. 15-23.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Functional distinction between CXC chemokines, interleukin-8 (IL-8), and growth related oncogene (GRO)α in neutrophil infiltration
AU - Fujiwara, Kazunori
AU - Matsukawa, Akihiro
AU - Ohkawara, Susumu
AU - Takagi, Katsumasa
AU - Yoshinaga, Masaru
PY - 2002
Y1 - 2002
N2 - Interleukin-8 (IL-8: CXCL8) and growth related oncogene α (GROα: CXCL1) are members of the CXC chemokines. In the present study, we explored the functional distinction between these CXC chemokines in the regulation of neutrophil infiltration. Injection of either rabbit IL-8 or GROα (10 μg each) into rabbit knee joints resulted in a massive neutrophil infiltration in the joints. At their peak time point (6 hours), the number of neutrophils induced by IL-8 was more than that induced by GROα. Each chemokine induced the other chemokine in the joints. TNFα activity was induced in the joints after administration of GROα, but not IL-8. Treatment with anti-GROα mAb and/or anti-TNFα mAb failed to inhibit IL-8-induced neutrophil infiltration. In contrast, either anti-IL-8 IgG or anti-TNFα mAb decreased GROα-induced response, and the inhibition was further enhanced by coadministration of these antibodies. Thus, it appears that IL-8 acts directly, whereas GROα acts indirectly, in part, on neutrophil infiltration. The distinct difference in TNFα production between IL-8 and GROα was further investigated. In vitro, GROα induced TNFα activity in cultured synovial cells, the cells producing TNFα in the joints after GROα-injection. However, IL-8 failed to produce TNFα activity from the cells, although equivalent levels of the mRNA expression were induced by IL-8 as compared with GROα. When recombinant rabbit TNFα was incubated with synovial fluids obtained at 2 hours after IL-8 injection, the resultant TNFα activity was significantly decreased, an event that was completely restored by a serine protease inhibitor, phenylmethylsulphonyl fluoride (PMSF). Furthermore, TNFα activity was unveiled in the joints when IL-8 was intra-articularly injected with PMSF. These data suggest that TNFα is degraded by serine protease(s) in the case of IL-8. Taken together, the data clearly demonstrate the functional distinction between IL-8 and GROα, which may influence the inflammatory responses.
AB - Interleukin-8 (IL-8: CXCL8) and growth related oncogene α (GROα: CXCL1) are members of the CXC chemokines. In the present study, we explored the functional distinction between these CXC chemokines in the regulation of neutrophil infiltration. Injection of either rabbit IL-8 or GROα (10 μg each) into rabbit knee joints resulted in a massive neutrophil infiltration in the joints. At their peak time point (6 hours), the number of neutrophils induced by IL-8 was more than that induced by GROα. Each chemokine induced the other chemokine in the joints. TNFα activity was induced in the joints after administration of GROα, but not IL-8. Treatment with anti-GROα mAb and/or anti-TNFα mAb failed to inhibit IL-8-induced neutrophil infiltration. In contrast, either anti-IL-8 IgG or anti-TNFα mAb decreased GROα-induced response, and the inhibition was further enhanced by coadministration of these antibodies. Thus, it appears that IL-8 acts directly, whereas GROα acts indirectly, in part, on neutrophil infiltration. The distinct difference in TNFα production between IL-8 and GROα was further investigated. In vitro, GROα induced TNFα activity in cultured synovial cells, the cells producing TNFα in the joints after GROα-injection. However, IL-8 failed to produce TNFα activity from the cells, although equivalent levels of the mRNA expression were induced by IL-8 as compared with GROα. When recombinant rabbit TNFα was incubated with synovial fluids obtained at 2 hours after IL-8 injection, the resultant TNFα activity was significantly decreased, an event that was completely restored by a serine protease inhibitor, phenylmethylsulphonyl fluoride (PMSF). Furthermore, TNFα activity was unveiled in the joints when IL-8 was intra-articularly injected with PMSF. These data suggest that TNFα is degraded by serine protease(s) in the case of IL-8. Taken together, the data clearly demonstrate the functional distinction between IL-8 and GROα, which may influence the inflammatory responses.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036144901&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036144901&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
C2 - 11796822
AN - SCOPUS:0036144901
VL - 82
SP - 15
EP - 23
JO - Laboratory Investigation
JF - Laboratory Investigation
SN - 0023-6837
IS - 1
ER -