TY - JOUR
T1 - Functional analysis of circadian pacemaker neurons in Drosophila melanogaster
AU - Rieger, Dirk
AU - Shafer, Orie Thomas
AU - Tomioka, Kenji
AU - Helfrich-Förster, Charlotte
PY - 2006/3/1
Y1 - 2006/3/1
N2 - The molecular mechanisms of circadian rhythms are well known, but how multiple clocks within one organism generate a structured rhythmic output remains a mystery. Many animals show bimodal activity rhythms with morning (M) and evening (E) activity bouts. One long-standing model assumes that two mutually coupled oscillators underlie these bouts and show different sensitivities to light. Three groups of lateral neurons (LN) and three groups of dorsal neurons govern behavioral rhythmicity of Drosophila. Recent data suggest that two groups of the LN (the ventral subset of the small LN cells and the dorsal subset of LN cells) are plausible candidates for the M and E oscillator, respectively. We provide evidence that these neuronal groups respond differently to light and can be completely desynchronized from one another by constant light, leading to two activity components that free-run with different periods. As expected, a long-period component started from the E activity bout. However, a short-period component originated not exclusively from the morning peak but more prominently from the evening peak. This reveals an interesting deviation from the original Pittendrigh and Daan (1976) model and suggests that a subgroup of the ventral subset of the small LN acts as "main" oscillator controlling M and E activity bouts in Drosophila.
AB - The molecular mechanisms of circadian rhythms are well known, but how multiple clocks within one organism generate a structured rhythmic output remains a mystery. Many animals show bimodal activity rhythms with morning (M) and evening (E) activity bouts. One long-standing model assumes that two mutually coupled oscillators underlie these bouts and show different sensitivities to light. Three groups of lateral neurons (LN) and three groups of dorsal neurons govern behavioral rhythmicity of Drosophila. Recent data suggest that two groups of the LN (the ventral subset of the small LN cells and the dorsal subset of LN cells) are plausible candidates for the M and E oscillator, respectively. We provide evidence that these neuronal groups respond differently to light and can be completely desynchronized from one another by constant light, leading to two activity components that free-run with different periods. As expected, a long-period component started from the E activity bout. However, a short-period component originated not exclusively from the morning peak but more prominently from the evening peak. This reveals an interesting deviation from the original Pittendrigh and Daan (1976) model and suggests that a subgroup of the ventral subset of the small LN acts as "main" oscillator controlling M and E activity bouts in Drosophila.
KW - Constant light
KW - Cryptochrome
KW - Dual oscillators
KW - Internal desynchronization
KW - Period
KW - Timeless
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33645646764&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33645646764&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1234-05.2006
DO - 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1234-05.2006
M3 - Article
C2 - 16510731
AN - SCOPUS:33645646764
SN - 0270-6474
VL - 26
SP - 2531
EP - 2543
JO - Journal of Neuroscience
JF - Journal of Neuroscience
IS - 9
ER -