Factorial invariance of a questionnaire assessing medication beliefs in Japanese non-adherent groups

Naomi Iihara, Kiyo Suzuki, Yuji Kurosaki, Shushi Morita, Keizo Hori

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective The aim of our study was to verify invariance of latent factors derived from the BMQ (Belief about Medicines Questionnaire) among Japanese adherent and non-adherent groups (adherent to medication and intentionally, unintentionally, and overlapping non-adherent groups) and to estimate mean differences of the latent factors among the groups. Setting A Japanese university hospital. Methods After administration of a cross-sectional survey, covariance structure analyses of the two-factor model were conducted. Groups that exhibited factorial invariance were identified, and structured mean analyses estimated the differences of the latent means of the factors between groups using the bootstrap method without relying on theoretical assumptions for sampling distributions. Effect size was employed as an indicator of these differences. Main outcome measure The differences in the latent means of the two factors (the necessity and concerns factors for prescribed medications) across the groups exhibiting factorial invariance, which reflect true differences between them. Results Factorial invariance was demonstrated only across adherent and unintentionally non-adherent groups. Unintentionally non-adherent patients had significantly lower latent means for the necessity factor than adherent patients, with a very close to medium effect size (-0.49; 95% CI -0.84, -0.14; bootstrap method). Conclusion A meaningful comparison of BMQ scale scores can be made between adherent and unintentionally non-adherent groups of Japanese patients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)432-439
Number of pages8
JournalPharmacy World and Science
Volume32
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2010

Fingerprint

Invariance
Medicine
Statistical Factor Analysis
Cross-Sectional Studies
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Sampling
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Adherence
  • Chronic disease
  • Covariance structure analysis
  • Factorial invariance
  • Japan
  • Psychometrics
  • Structural equation modelling

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pharmaceutical Science
  • Pharmacology
  • Toxicology
  • Pharmacy
  • Pharmacology (medical)

Cite this

Factorial invariance of a questionnaire assessing medication beliefs in Japanese non-adherent groups. / Iihara, Naomi; Suzuki, Kiyo; Kurosaki, Yuji; Morita, Shushi; Hori, Keizo.

In: Pharmacy World and Science, Vol. 32, No. 4, 08.2010, p. 432-439.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Iihara, Naomi ; Suzuki, Kiyo ; Kurosaki, Yuji ; Morita, Shushi ; Hori, Keizo. / Factorial invariance of a questionnaire assessing medication beliefs in Japanese non-adherent groups. In: Pharmacy World and Science. 2010 ; Vol. 32, No. 4. pp. 432-439.
@article{655fbe1b493643ca871906db3858b8d1,
title = "Factorial invariance of a questionnaire assessing medication beliefs in Japanese non-adherent groups",
abstract = "Objective The aim of our study was to verify invariance of latent factors derived from the BMQ (Belief about Medicines Questionnaire) among Japanese adherent and non-adherent groups (adherent to medication and intentionally, unintentionally, and overlapping non-adherent groups) and to estimate mean differences of the latent factors among the groups. Setting A Japanese university hospital. Methods After administration of a cross-sectional survey, covariance structure analyses of the two-factor model were conducted. Groups that exhibited factorial invariance were identified, and structured mean analyses estimated the differences of the latent means of the factors between groups using the bootstrap method without relying on theoretical assumptions for sampling distributions. Effect size was employed as an indicator of these differences. Main outcome measure The differences in the latent means of the two factors (the necessity and concerns factors for prescribed medications) across the groups exhibiting factorial invariance, which reflect true differences between them. Results Factorial invariance was demonstrated only across adherent and unintentionally non-adherent groups. Unintentionally non-adherent patients had significantly lower latent means for the necessity factor than adherent patients, with a very close to medium effect size (-0.49; 95{\%} CI -0.84, -0.14; bootstrap method). Conclusion A meaningful comparison of BMQ scale scores can be made between adherent and unintentionally non-adherent groups of Japanese patients.",
keywords = "Adherence, Chronic disease, Covariance structure analysis, Factorial invariance, Japan, Psychometrics, Structural equation modelling",
author = "Naomi Iihara and Kiyo Suzuki and Yuji Kurosaki and Shushi Morita and Keizo Hori",
year = "2010",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1007/s11096-010-9388-7",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "432--439",
journal = "International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy",
issn = "2210-7703",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Factorial invariance of a questionnaire assessing medication beliefs in Japanese non-adherent groups

AU - Iihara, Naomi

AU - Suzuki, Kiyo

AU - Kurosaki, Yuji

AU - Morita, Shushi

AU - Hori, Keizo

PY - 2010/8

Y1 - 2010/8

N2 - Objective The aim of our study was to verify invariance of latent factors derived from the BMQ (Belief about Medicines Questionnaire) among Japanese adherent and non-adherent groups (adherent to medication and intentionally, unintentionally, and overlapping non-adherent groups) and to estimate mean differences of the latent factors among the groups. Setting A Japanese university hospital. Methods After administration of a cross-sectional survey, covariance structure analyses of the two-factor model were conducted. Groups that exhibited factorial invariance were identified, and structured mean analyses estimated the differences of the latent means of the factors between groups using the bootstrap method without relying on theoretical assumptions for sampling distributions. Effect size was employed as an indicator of these differences. Main outcome measure The differences in the latent means of the two factors (the necessity and concerns factors for prescribed medications) across the groups exhibiting factorial invariance, which reflect true differences between them. Results Factorial invariance was demonstrated only across adherent and unintentionally non-adherent groups. Unintentionally non-adherent patients had significantly lower latent means for the necessity factor than adherent patients, with a very close to medium effect size (-0.49; 95% CI -0.84, -0.14; bootstrap method). Conclusion A meaningful comparison of BMQ scale scores can be made between adherent and unintentionally non-adherent groups of Japanese patients.

AB - Objective The aim of our study was to verify invariance of latent factors derived from the BMQ (Belief about Medicines Questionnaire) among Japanese adherent and non-adherent groups (adherent to medication and intentionally, unintentionally, and overlapping non-adherent groups) and to estimate mean differences of the latent factors among the groups. Setting A Japanese university hospital. Methods After administration of a cross-sectional survey, covariance structure analyses of the two-factor model were conducted. Groups that exhibited factorial invariance were identified, and structured mean analyses estimated the differences of the latent means of the factors between groups using the bootstrap method without relying on theoretical assumptions for sampling distributions. Effect size was employed as an indicator of these differences. Main outcome measure The differences in the latent means of the two factors (the necessity and concerns factors for prescribed medications) across the groups exhibiting factorial invariance, which reflect true differences between them. Results Factorial invariance was demonstrated only across adherent and unintentionally non-adherent groups. Unintentionally non-adherent patients had significantly lower latent means for the necessity factor than adherent patients, with a very close to medium effect size (-0.49; 95% CI -0.84, -0.14; bootstrap method). Conclusion A meaningful comparison of BMQ scale scores can be made between adherent and unintentionally non-adherent groups of Japanese patients.

KW - Adherence

KW - Chronic disease

KW - Covariance structure analysis

KW - Factorial invariance

KW - Japan

KW - Psychometrics

KW - Structural equation modelling

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77956420313&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77956420313&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11096-010-9388-7

DO - 10.1007/s11096-010-9388-7

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 432

EP - 439

JO - International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy

JF - International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy

SN - 2210-7703

IS - 4

ER -